The Conversation -- June 5, 2025
Marie: I had to be away for much of the day, and during that time, the Big Beautiful Silence ended as predicted ~~~
~~~ Cat Zakrzewski, et al., of the Washington Post: “The alliance between ... Donald Trump and Elon Musk spectacularly imploded Thursday as the world’s most prominent bromance collapsed into mutual public trolling.... The breakup also highlighted the political and financial risks each man could now face from a prolonged quarrel: Musk, who spent at least $288 million in 2024 to help elect Trump and other Republicans, accused the president of 'such ingratitude' and publicly mused about starting a third party. Trump responded by threatening Musk’s government contracts. The stock price of Tesla, the electric vehicle company Musk owns, fell sharply, down 14 percent at the market close. The public unraveling began in the Oval Office where Trump spoke to reporters at the start of a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' he said. 'I don’t know if we will anymore.'... Musk volleyed back, declaring it was 'time to drop the really big bomb' that Trump 'is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day DJT!'” ~~~
~~~ Michelle Price of the AP: “'He hasn’t said bad about me personally, but I’m sure that will be next,' Trump said Thursday in the Oval Office, presaging the rest of his day. 'But I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot.'... The tech entrepreneur even shared a post on social media calling for Trump’s impeachment and skewered the president’s signature tariffs, predicting a recession this year.... 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote on his social media network. 'Go ahead, make my day,' Musk quickly replied on X. Hours later, Musk announced SpaceX would begin decommissioning the spacecraft it used to carry astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station for NASA.” ~~~
~~~ Here's the New York Times liveblog, which adds both details & context.
Ana Swanson & David Pierson of the New York Times: “China and the United States agreed on Thursday to hold more trade talks in hopes of breaking an impasse over tariffs and global supplies of rare earth minerals that has begun to threaten the global economy. The promise of fresh discussions followed a phone conversation between the leaders of the two superpowers that ... [Donald] Trump described as 'very positive.' Mr. Trump said in a post on Truth Social that his call with Xi Jinping, China’s top leader, had focused entirely on the trade relationship between the nations, which has soured in recent months in a dispute over the export of critical minerals used in an array of industries. The president implied that the two leaders had resolved issues surrounding mineral exports, which China had recently halted to the United States, though he did not provide details. He said his trade team would meet again soon with Chinese officials, in a yet-to-be-determined location.”
Sarah Kliff & Margot Sanger-Katz of the New York Times: “Millions of Obamacare enrollees would lose health coverage under the Republicans’ major policy bill, which would make coverage more expensive and harder to obtain. Most of the proposals in the bill, which passed the House last month, are technical changes — reductions to enrollment periods, adjustments to formulas, and additional paperwork requirements. But together, they would leave about four million people uninsured in the next 10 years, the Congressional Budget Office reported Wednesday. 'In many ways, it’s sort of repeal by paper cut,' said Audrey Morse Gasteier, the director of the state marketplace in Massachusetts. Alongside these proposals is another challenge to the program: Additional Obamacare funding is set to expire at the end of the year, and Republicans do not plan to extend it. If they don’t, the C.B.O. estimates an additional 4.2 million Americans would lose coverage.... Taken together, proposed changes and the expiration of the subsidies could threaten the viability of the Obamacare markets themselves.... These losses would be in addition to those from the bill’s many changes to Medicaid, the health insurance program for the poor and disabled. Cuts to Medicaid are expected to cause 7.8 million more people to be uninsured by the end of a decade.”
Adam Liptak of the New York Times: “The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously ruled in favor of a straight woman who twice lost positions to gay workers, saying an appeals court had been wrong to require her to meet a heightened burden in seeking to prove workplace discrimination because she was a member of a majority group. The decision came two years after the Supreme Court struck down race-conscious admissions programs in higher education and amid the Trump administration’s fierce efforts to root out programs that promote diversity. The ruling will place further pressure on employers and others to eliminate affirmative action and other initiatives that seek to provide opportunities to members of historically disadvantaged groups. Nearly half of the federal appeals courts had required men and white people and other members of majority groups to meet a more demanding standard when they sued for workplace discrimination. In eliminating that requirement, the court said that a federal civil rights law demanded equal treatment of all individuals.” The AP report is here.
~~~~~~~~~~
Marie: Some day, perhaps not some day soon, we will experience a day where none of what I think is "news" is about something crazy or cruel or corrupt or stupid (or a combination thereof) that Donald Trump does. This is definitely not that kind of day. In fact, it's a 25th Amendment kind of day. I suspect the old boy dove off the deep end when the pool was empty.
Chris Cameron of the New York Times: Donald “Trump ordered his White House counsel and the attorney general on Wednesday to investigate former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his staff in Mr. Trump’s latest attempt to stoke outlandish conspiracy theories about his predecessor. In an executive order, Mr. Trump put the power and resources of the federal government to work examining whether some of Mr. Biden’s presidential actions were legally invalid because his aides had enacted those policies without his knowledge. The executive order came after Mr. Trump shared a social media post over the weekend that claimed Mr. Biden had been 'executed in 2020' and replaced by a robotic clone, following a pattern of suggestions by the president and his allies that Mr. Biden was a mentally incapacitated puppet of his aides. The former president called such claims 'ridiculous and false' in a statefeloment on Wednesday after the order’s release.” The AP's story is here.
David Nakamura, et al., of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump on Wednesday restricted the entry of travelers to the United States from more than a dozen countries, resurrecting and expanding sweeping restrictions from his first term that are expected to draw swift legal challenges. The presidential proclamation, slated to go into effect June 9, fully restricts the entry of individuals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also partially restricts the entry of travelers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. The Trump administration, in a document circulated Wednesday evening, cited national security concerns and said the president made his decision after reviewing a State Department report. Authorities said the ban was necessary to compel foreign governments to cooperate with their agenda and enforce the country’s immigration laws.... In a video released by the White House, the president referred to the attack Sunday that injured a dozen demonstrators in Boulder, Colorado.... Federal authorities said the attack was carried out by an immigrant from Egypt who arrived on a visa. Egypt is not on the list of countries* whose citizens will be restricted or barred from entering the United States.” (Also linked yesterday.) The AP report is here. Related story on the family of the accused attacker linked below. ~~~
~~~ *Marie: Evidently executive orders don't have to make sense. AND they are apt to be nonsensical when the POTUS* is batshit crazy: ~~~
~~~ Michael Bender of the New York Times: Donald “Trump said on Wednesday that he would prevent Harvard University’s international students from entering the country, an aggressive move the school called 'illegal.' Mr. Trump, in the same proclamation, also urged Secretary of State Marco Rubio to consider revoking current visas for Harvard students. The extraordinary action marks the first time Mr. Trump has tried to directly use the power of the presidency against Harvard, an indication of how personal the effort to inflict distress on the Ivy League university has become for him.... 'I have determined that the entry of the class of foreign nationals described above is detrimental to the interests of the United States because, in my judgment, Harvard’s conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers,' Mr. Trump wrote in the proclamation.... Mr. Trump’s order appeared to be a direct rejoinder to Judge Allison D. Burroughs of the District of Massachusetts, who said last month that she would block an effort by the Department of Homeland Security to prevent Harvard from enrolling international students. She has not yet formally issued her injunction.” (This is an update of a story linked yesterday.) The Guardian's story is here.
Sharon Otterman of the New York Times: “The Trump administration escalated its attack on Columbia University on Wednesday by taking a warning shot against its accreditation, a key credential that U.S. universities need to receive federal student aid. The federal Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights, which two weeks ago found that Columbia violated civil rights laws by 'acting with deliberate indifference' toward the harassment of Jewish students, sent a letter on Wednesday to the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, the nongovernmental organization that accredits Columbia. The letter said that because Columbia was in violation of federal anti-discrimination laws, the Education Department believes it fails to meet the standards for accreditation.” (Also linked yesterday.) Politico's story is here.
Jacob Bogage & Theodoric Meyer of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump is pursuing an agenda that would add trillions of dollars to the soaring national debt, ignoring warnings from Wall Street, Republican deficit hawks and his outgoing cost-cutting champion. Though Trump ran for office in part on pledges to slash the size of the federal government and rein in the debt, his record so far has been less fiscally disciplined. His administration this week asked Congress to cancel a little more than $9 billion in spending in the current fiscal year — a fraction of a federal budget that has grown to nearly $7 trillion. The government has already spent nearly $170 billion more in the fiscal year that began in October than it did by this point in the previous year. The tariffs that the White House has said would produce a gusher of new revenue face an uncertain future, challenged in court and subject to revision as Trump negotiates with foreign trading partners.”
~~~ Thanks to RAS for the link. ~~~
~~~ Alicia Parlapiano, et al., of the New York Times: “There’s no question that ... [Donald] Trump’s proposal to stop taxing tips has broad appeal. It’s popular in polling, lawmakers in both parties support it, and now a version of the idea is on its way to becoming law. But the effect of the policy would actually be quite narrow. About 3 percent of American workers receive tips, but about a third of those employees would not see a gain from the change. That’s because of the way Republicans structured the policy in the tax legislation they passed through the House recently. Here’s who would benefit under their plan — and who wouldn’t.” (Also linked yesterday.) More on Trump's Big Bad Bill linked below.
Heather Cox Richardson: “Just hours after ... Donald J. Trump posted on social media [Tuesday] that '[b]ecause of Tariffs, our Economy is BOOMING!' a new report from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) said the opposite. Founded in 1961, the OECD is a forum in which 38 market-based democracies cooperate to promote sustainable economic growth. The OECD’s economic outlook reports that economic growth around the globe is slowing because of Trump’s trade war. It projects global growth slowing from 3.3% in 2024 to 2.9% in 2025 and 2026. That economic slowdown is concentrated primarily in the United States, Canada, Mexico, and China. The OECD predicts that growth in the United States will decline from 2.8% in 2024 to 1.6% in 2025 and 1.5% in 2026. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released two analyses today of Trump’s policies that add more detail to that report. The CBO’s estimate for the effect of Trump’s current tariffs — which are unlikely to stay as they are — is that they will raise inflation and slow economic growth as consumers bear their costs.”
Jeff Cox of CNBC: “Private sector job creation slowed to a near standstill in May, hitting its lowest level in more than two years as signs emerged of a weakening labor market, payrolls processing firm ADP reported Wednesday. Payrolls increased just 37,000 for the month, below the downwardly revised 60,000 in April and the Dow Jones forecast for 110,000. It was the lowest monthly job total from the ADP count since March 2023.” (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~
~~~ Kevin Breuninger of CNBC: “... Donald Trump on Wednesday angrily urged Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell to cut interest rates, minutes after the payroll firm ADP reported its lowest private-sector jobs number in years. 'ADP NUMBER OUT!!! “Too Late” Powell must now LOWER THE RATE,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'He is unbelievable!!!' the president said of the central bank chairman, whom he has frequently pressured to shave borrowing rates in hopes of spurring economic growth.” (Also linked yesterday.) MB: Gosh, I wonder if just maybe Trump's tariffs, not interest rates, account for the weak jobs market. It doesn't matter, of course, because nothing is Trump's fault. Ever. Not even this: ~~~
~~~ Zach Everson of Forbes: "Of the roughly 115 retail food establishments inspected in Somerset County[, New Jersey,] in May, Trump’s [Bedminister] club received the lowest score — 32 out of 100. All but one other venue scored 60 or higher, according to a county records search.... Trump’s Bedminster club continues to serve alcohol nearly a year after New Jersey declined to renew its liquor license, citing questions over whether ... Trump’s felony convictions disqualify him under state law. The club has a temporary permit, which is set to expire on June 30." Thanks to laura h. for the link. The page is firewalled, and I didn't get through it, but I copied the bit laura copied in today's Comments. If you haven't used up your Forbes freebies this month (might be only one), you're good. (Also linked yesterday.)
Alan Feuer of the New York Times: “A federal judge in Washington ordered the Trump administration on Wednesday to take steps toward giving nearly 140 Venezuelan immigrants who were deported to El Salvador in March under a rarely invoked wartime law the due process that they had been denied. In a sweeping and at times outraged opinion, the judge, James E. Boasberg, compared the expelled men to characters in a Kafka novel. Judge Boasberg also asserted that they were likely to prevail in their claims that President Trump had treated them unfairly by deporting them without hearings to a brutal Salvadoran prison under the expansive powers of the wartime statute, known as the Alien Enemies Act. Judge Boasberg did not weigh in on the question of whether Mr. Trump had invoked the act lawfully when he expelled the men, who are accused of being members of the street gang Tren de Aragua, to the prison in El Salvador on March 15. He simply asserted that the White House had stripped them of their rights by not allowing them to contest their deportations before they were flown into the custody of jailers at the so-called Terrorism Confinement Center, also known as CECOT.” ~~~
~~~ Judge Boasberg's ruling is here, via the courts. Politico's report, by Josh Gerstein & Kyle Cheney, is here.
Maria Sacchetti, et al., of the Washington Post: “A federal judge on Wednesday barred the Trump administration from deporting the wife and children of an Egyptian man accused of throwing molotov cocktails at a pro-Israel demonstration in Colorado after immigration officials detained them and vowed to immediately expel them from the country. U.S. District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher in Colorado found that deporting the family 'without process' could cause irreparable harm and said he was issuing his order 'due to the urgency this situation presents.' He scheduled a hearing in the case for June 13. The development came after lawyers for Hayam El Gamal and her five children filed an emergency petition earlier in the day arguing that their detentions were illegal. The family’s attorneys wrote that officials violated their constitutional rights and other federal laws by depriving them of due process and protection from being punished for another person’s alleged crimes.”
Alan Feuer & Mattathias Schwartz of the New York Times: “The Trump administration has brought back to the United States a Guatemalan man who was wrongfully deported to Mexico, albeit to an uncertain future, his lawyers said on Wednesday. Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the man, known only by his initials, O.C.G., said that she expected him to remain in federal custody as the administration determined how to handle his case. Last week, the Justice Department said it would comply with a federal judge’s order to 'facilitate' the return of O.C.G., a gay man who was sent to Mexico this year despite having told American authorities that he had experienced violence there and was afraid to go back. That administration officials obeyed the instructions of the judge, Brian E. Murphy of the Federal District Court in Massachusetts, was a significant departure from the defiant stance that the White House has staked out in other immigration matters.” A CBS News story is here.
Jack Healy of the New York Times: “An immigrant waitress from Hong Kong whose looming deportation brought home the reality of President Trump’s immigration crackdown to her conservative Missouri hometown was freed on Wednesday after more than a month in jail.... Her lawyer, Raymond Bolourtchi, said ... Ming Li Hui, better known as Carol to everyone in Kennett, Mo...., had been released under a federal immigration program that offers a 'temporary safe haven' to immigrants from Hong Kong and a handful of other countries who are concerned about returning there. The so-called deferred enforced departure gives Ms. Hui a reprieve but does not guarantee her future in the United States.... Ms. Hui, who was born in Hong Kong, entered the United States 20 years ago on a short-term tourist visa and stayed long past its expiration, in the process building a life, having three children and becoming a beloved waitress serving waffles and hugs to the breakfast crowd at a diner in Kennett....”
Julia Ainsley, et al., of NBC News: "Immigration and Customs Enforcement made the most immigrant arrests in a single day in its history Tuesday, detaining more than 2,200 people, according to a source familiar with the arrests and an ICE spokesperson who confirmed the numbers, as the agency responds to pressure from the White House to rapidly and dramatically increase arrests. Hundreds of the people who were arrested had been enrolled in ICE’s Alternative to Detention (ATD) program.... Under the program, ICE releases undocumented immigrants who are deemed not to be threats to public safety and then keeps track of them through ankle monitors, smartphone apps or other geolocating programs, along with periodic check-ins at ICE facilities. At least some of the arrests appear to be the result of a new ICE tactic: Immigration attorneys across the country told NBC News that some of their clients on ATD were asked in a mass text message ICE sent out to show up ahead of schedule for check-ins at ICE offices, only to be arrested when they arrived." ~~~
~~~
Marie: Even on matters that Trump supposedly cares a lot about, he is making decision that appear to be designed to lead to failure. Take, for instance, the appointment of little Tommy Fugate. ~~~
~~~ All the Best People, Ctd. Hanna Allam of ProPublica: “A year after graduation [from college], the 22-year-old [Thomas Fugate] with no apparent national security expertise is now a Department of Homeland Security official overseeing the government’s main hub for terrorism prevention, including an $18 million grant program intended to help communities combat violent extremism. The White House appointed Fugate, a former Trump campaign worker who interned at the hard-right Heritage Foundation, to a Homeland Security role that was expanded to include the Center for Prevention Programs and Partnerships. Known as CP3, the office has led nationwide efforts to prevent hate-fueled attacks, school shootings and other forms of targeted violence.... In the past seven weeks, at least five high-profile targeted attacks have unfolded across the U.S., including a car bombing in California and the gunning down of two Israeli Embassy aides in Washington. Against this backdrop, current and former national security officials say, the Trump administration’s decision to shift counterterrorism resources to immigration and leave the violence-prevention portfolio to inexperienced appointees is 'reckless.'” Allam describes two theories as to why Fugate was assigned to run CP3.
Jill Cowan of the New York Times: “The Trump administration said it would pull roughly $4 billion in federal funding for California’s long-planned high-speed train, a project that has, over decades, become an avatar for the country’s declining ability to complete transformative new infrastructure. In a report sent to the state’s high-speed rail authority on Wednesday, Drew Feeley, the acting head of the Federal Railroad Administration, wrote that the project has repeatedly blown past projected deadlines by years, and cost estimates by billions of dollars. It gave California 30 days to respond to the findings of the review before what it said was a likely decision to revoke the funding.... A spokesman for the state rail authority said the state intended to keep the project moving forward.”
Ha! Maura Judkis, et al., of the Washington Post: “... Donald Trump’s latest attempt to assert control over an elite American cultural institution has turned into a high-stakes Washington standoff. In defiance of Trump’s announcement last Friday that he was firing her, Kim Sajet — the director of the Smithsonian Institution’s National Portrait Gallery — has continued to report for work, conducting meetings and handling other museum business as she did before.... Writing on Truth Social, Trump had declared he is firing Sajet because she 'is a highly partisan person' and because she is a 'strong supporter of DEI.'... Trump has not provided a legal reasoning to support his authority to fire Sajet. Top congressional Democrats have asserted the president does not have legal authority for the firing.... [The Smithsonian] is not a traditional government agency nor part of the executive branch, and hiring and firing decisions have historically been handled by the Smithsonian’s secretary, rather than its Board of Regents. The Smithsonian’s current secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch III, is widely expected to discuss the president’s attempt to oust Sajet at the board meeting Monday.” ~~~
~~~ Jamelle Bouie of the New York Times sees Trump's attempt to fire Sajet as a symptom of a much broader malady: “It is Trump’s compulsion to dominate — his ego-driven quest for mastery over everything and everyone he encounters — that has shaped the latent potential for a monarchical presidency into something as close to reality as we’ve yet seen in American life.... We should treat Trump and his openly authoritarian administration as a failure, not just of our party system or our legal system, but also of our Constitution and its ability to meaningfully constrain a destructive and system-threatening force in our political life. And while we can stipulate the extent to which Trump’s rise was contingent on the particular choices of particular people, it is also true that a less countermajoritarian and antidemocratic system might have kept Trump out of office.”
Liz Whyte of the Wall Street Journal, replished by MSN: “Passing the GOP’s 'One Big Beautiful Bill' in its current form would push about 11 million people out of Medicaid or other forms of health coverage, leaving them uninsured by 2034, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said Wednesday.”
Andrew Duehren of the New York Times: “The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said on Wednesday that the broad Republican bill to cut taxes and slash some federal programs would add $2.4 trillion to the already soaring national debt over the next decade, in an analysis that was all but certain to inflame concerns that President Trump’s domestic agenda would lead to excessive government borrowing.... The United States government currently has roughly $29 trillion in public debt, and the budget office had previously forecast that it would grow by roughly $21 trillion over the next decade, reaching nearly $50 trillion in 2034, as a growing share of Americans take advantage of government retirement support. With a roughly $3.8 trillion tax cut at its core, the Republican bill had long been expected to significantly add to that debt....”
Marie: Some experts have expressed concern that the unscrupulous Trump administration and its allies would try to fake, suppress or withhold calculations and estimates that were unhelpful to its goals. Well, lookie here: ~~~
~~~ Tony Romm of the New York Times: “Even before House Republicans learned the full price of their tax package on Wednesday, one of the bill’s chief authors, Representative Jason Smith of Missouri, was sowing doubt about the accuracy of the estimate.... In the bitter war over the nation’s fiscal future, President Trump and his Republican allies have united around a new foe: the economists and budget experts who have warned about the costs of the party’s tax ambitions. Republican leaders have set about trying to discredit any hint of unfavorable accounting on their signature legislation as they race to enact it before the president’s self-imposed July 4 deadline.... They reserved their fiercest criticism for the Congressional Budget Office, a team of nonpartisan aides who helped to author the price check issued on Wednesday. Mr. Trump and his advisers have tried to paint the budget office as historically inaccurate and overly political.” And here: ~~~
... there hasn’t been a single staffer in the entire Congressional Budget Office that has contributed to a Republican since the year 2000. But guess what, there have been many staffers within the Congressional Budget Office who have contributed to Democratic candidates and politicians every single cycle since. So unfortunately, this is an institution in our country that has become partisan and political. -- White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, briefing, June 3
When we asked about this claim, a White House official defended it as 'a verifiable fact' and she provided a link to Federal Election Commission records, showing 250 contributions since 2000 made by people who listed the CBO as their employer. But there are also stupid facts — and this one is remarkably dumb.... The FEC list of contributions does not demonstrate that the agency, run by a Republican, has turned 'partisan and political' on behalf of Democrats. Instead, it shows a handful of low-level employees made a bunch of small contributions to Democrats.... The White House apparently thought it was clever to go back 25 years. But let’s not forget, before 2011, Donald Trump donated more to Democrats than Republicans. That’s a verifiable fact too, but we would not claim it means much today. -- Glenn Kessler of the Washington Post
~~~ Ben Casselman of the New York Times: “The Bureau of Labor Statistics is cutting back its collection of data on consumer prices, raising questions about the reliability of federal economic statistics under ... [Donald] Trump. Every month, a small army of government workers visits stores and other businesses across the country to check prices of eggs, underwear, haircuts, and tens of thousands of other goods and services. The data collected is the basis for the inflation measures that determine cost-of-living increases in union contracts and Social Security benefits and that guide policymakers at the Federal Reserve when they set interest rates, among other applications. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, which is part of the Labor Department, said on Wednesday that it was reducing its collection of price data 'in areas across the country' and that it had stopped gathering data entirely in Buffalo; Lincoln, Neb.; and Provo, Utah. The agency did not give a specific reason for the cuts, but said it 'makes reductions when current resources can no longer support the collection effort.'” MB: IOW, the Musk Chainsaw Effect.
Rachel Scott & Will Steakin of ABC News: "Elon Musk is continuing his attacks on ... Donald Trump's signature bill on Wednesday with a barrage of posts on X slamming the megabill, saying in one that no one 'should be able to stomach it,"'while another instructed his more than 200 million followers to call members of Congress to 'KILL the BILL.' Musk, who until recently had largely scaled back posting about politics, on Wednesday alone has already posted or helped amplify posts on X criticizing the bill more than 25 times. 'Mammoth spending bills are bankrupting America! ENOUGH,' Musk wrote in one post. In another, Musk was more forceful, writing, 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.'... Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Wednesday morning that Musk was 'flat wrong' about his criticisms on the spending bill and its effect on the deficit -- adding that he tried to call the tech billionaire Tuesday night, but Musk didn't answer." ~~~
~~~ Marie: So far, nothing from Trump. I read or heard somewhere that Musk still "owes" Trump $100MM in promised PAC contributions. If that's true, it helps explain the Big, Beautiful Silence. But it can't last. Even for $100MM. ~~~
~~~ Adam Cancryn & Jake Traylor of Politico: “... Donald Trump is frustrated with Elon Musk for slamming the administration’s chief legislative priority, but isn’t taking it personally — a distinction that’s helped keep a lid on the White House’s response so far. Yet as Musk’s attacks stretch into their second day, administration officials are wondering how long the peace will hold.... Within the West Wing, [Trump's] aides dismissed Musk’s complaints about the bill’s size and deficit spending, arguing instead that Musk is upset primarily because it eliminates tax credits that stood to benefit his electric car company Tesla.... The White House has publicly downplayed the rift, emphasizing that Musk is now a private citizen and that he still agrees with Trump on a host of other issues.” ~~~
Cashing In. Maegan Vazquez of the Washington Post: President Biden's “former press secretary said she has written a book that will detail working in a 'broken White House' and her decision to leave the Democratic Party and become an independent. The book from former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre ... will describe 'the three weeks that led to Biden’s abandoning his bid for a second term and the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision,' according to the publisher, Legacy Lit. It is set for release Oct. 21.... Speaking at the Harvard Kennedy School Institute of Politics in February, Jean-Pierre said the 'toughest thing' to see in the three weeks between the president’s halting debate performance and dropping out of the race was the 'firing squad' from fellow Democrats.” The CBS News story is here. ~~~
~~~ Eli Stokols of Politico: “Karine Jean-Pierre’s announcement that she’s leaving the Democratic Party — timed with the rollout of a new book — has detonated long-simmering grievances among her former White House colleagues about Jean-Pierre’s pursuit of celebrity and personal media exposure while serving as then-President Joe Biden’s press secretary. The attention-grabbing ploy lit up Democratic and Biden alumni texting groups and reignited frustrations that burned for years about Jean-Pierre.... 'Everyone thinks this is a grift,' [a] former official said of Jean-Pierre’s book project.” ~~~
~~~ Andrew Solender of Axios: "House Republicans' longstanding frustrations with Elon Musk are spilling out in an unprecedented way behind closed doors after he criticized them for supporting ... [Donald] Trump's ;One Big, Beautiful Bill.'... In some lawmakers' telling, the internal GOP frustration didn't come about overnight. It's been stewing for months — and Musk has now opened the floodgates. 'He's a complete joke. He had no idea what the f*** he was doing, whatsoever,' said one House Republican.... 'Nobody really wanted him here. We couldn't wait to get rid of him.'... Even now, many House Republicans expressed extreme reluctance to put their names to even mild criticism of the mercurial billionaire."
Geoffrey Fowler of the Washington Post: tested five A.I. chatboxes on their ability to read, summarize and fact-check various forms of writing as well as speeches by Donald Trump. “All told, I asked 115 questions about the assigned reading to ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Meta AI and Gemini. Some of the AI responses were astoundingly good. Others were so clueless they sounded like 'Seinfeld’s' George Costanza. All the bots barring one made up — or 'hallucinated' — information, a persistent AI problem.” Thanks to unwashed for the link. ~~~~~~~~~~
Florida/Michigan. Paul Campos in LG&$ follows U. Michigan president Santo Ono's sudden change-of-heart on defending academic freedom. How could it be that a prestigious state university president wouldn't stand up for academic freedom? Campos has it all figured out. Thanks to RAS for the link. Still, it didn't work out for Ono -- see WashPo report under "Florida" below. And, as we were saying, Campos' post conforms with our contention that university presidents' salaries have ballooned." (Also linked yesterday.)
~~~~~~~~~~