June 25, 2022
Afternoon Update:
David Savage of the New York Times: President "Biden returns to Europe on Saturday night at a moment when everything about the war [in Ukraine] is [difficult]. While Russia's oil exports have fallen precipitously, its revenues have actually been on the rise, a function of soaring fuel prices. After concentrating its efforts in Ukraine's south and east, Russia is making incremental but significant gains, as the Ukrainians, surrounded, begin to give up key cities: first Mariupol, and now, in the east, Sievierodonetsk. So Mr. Biden must prepare his allies for a grinding conflict -- a return to the 'long, twilight struggle' that President John F. Kennedy talked about during the Cold War -- amid shocks in the food and energy markets, and inflation on a scale few imagined six months ago. Not surprisingly, a few cracks are already emerging, as popular discontent, and coming elections, begin to worry allied leaders."
Donald Judd of CNN: "President Joe Biden on Saturday signed into law the first major federal gun safety legislation passed in decades, marking a significant bipartisan breakthrough on one of the most contentious policy issues in Washington.... In his remarks Saturday, the President announced he'd host members of Congress who supported the landmark gun safety legislation at a White House event on July 11, following his return from Europe, to celebrate the new law with the families of gun violence victims. The package represents the most significant new federal legislation to address gun violence since the expired 10-year assault weapons ban of 1994 -- though it fails to ban any weapons and falls far short of what Biden and his party had advocated for, and polls show most Americans want to see." A New York Times report is here. ~~~
Norway. Henrik Libell & Mike Ives of the New York Times: "A 10-day Pride festival in Norway was cut short on Saturday after an early-morning shooting left two people dead and at least 10 others seriously wounded outside a popular gay club in downtown Oslo. The police are investigating the attack as an act of terrorism. The shooting, on a warm summer night that saw streets filled with revelers, came hours before Oslo was set to host big crowds for its first Pride parade since 2019. The event's organizers canceled the parade and the rest of the festival, which was to run through Monday, at the suggestion of the police."
~~~~~~~~~~
Caroline Kitchener, et al., of the Washington Post: "The Supreme Court's decision on Friday to overturn Roe v. Wade sets off a cascade of antiabortion legislation that will affect roughly half the country. Without the landmark precedent in place, access to abortion will change quickly. First, 13 states with 'trigger bans,' designed to take effect if Roe were struck down, will prohibit abortion within 30 days. Several other states with antiabortion laws blocked by the courts are expected to act, with lawmakers moving to activate their dormant legislation. A handful of states also have pre-Roe abortion bans that could be brought back to life, and others moved yesterday to introduce new legislation. In 20 states and the District of Columbia, abortion already is legal and access is likely to be protected."
Adam Liptak of the New York Times: "The Supreme Court on Friday overturned Roe v. Wade, eliminating the constitutional right to abortion after almost 50 years in a decision that will transform American life, reshape the nation's politics and lead to all but total bans on the procedure in about half of the states.... Bans in at least eight states swiftly took effect after they enacted laws meant to be enforced immediately after Roe fell. More states are expected to follow in the coming days, reflecting the main holding in the decision, that states are free to end the practice if they choose to do so.... Protests swelled across the country on Friday evening. Outside the Supreme Court, thousands of abortion rights supporters demonstrated alongside small groups of celebrating anti-abortion activists.... Throngs spilled into the streets in large cities like Los Angeles, Chicago and Philadelphia, and smaller crowds gathered in places like Louisville, Ky., and Tallahassee, Fla.... The ruling will test the legitimacy of the court and vindicate a decades-long Republican project of installing conservative justices prepared to reject the precedent, which had been repeatedly reaffirmed by earlier courts. It will also be one of the signal legacies of ... Donald J. Trump, who vowed to name justices who would overrule Roe. All three of his appointees were in the majority in the ruling." The AP's report is here.
Iowa. Andy Campbell & Alanna Vagianos of the Huffington Post: "A truck driver careened into a group of demonstrators in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, on Friday as they crossed the street during an otherwise peaceful protest of the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The unidentified male driver of a Ford truck rammed into several protesters -- all of them women -- at the tail end of a procession, rolling over one woman's ankle and sending her to the hospital, witnesses said. 'He tried t murder them,' said a local journalist and witness to the attack, Lyz Lenz. 'These women see him coming and a bunch of people put their hands out to stop him. And he just keeps going.'"
Shawna Chen of Axios: "California, Washington and Oregon are launching a 'West Coast offense' to protect reproductive rights following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the states' Democratic governors announced Friday.... The commitment vows to set up protections against states that target medical professionals who provide abortions and patients who receive legal reproductive health care services in California, Washington and Oregon. It also pledges to 'protect against judicial and local law enforcement cooperation with out-of-state investigations, inquiries and arrests' related to abortions performed in the three states. The three states will '[r]efuse non-fugitive extradition of individuals for criminal prosecution' related to accessing legal reproductive health care."
Zolan Kanno-Youngs of the New York Times: "Calling the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade a 'tragic error,' President Biden on Friday tried to galvanize voters ahead of the midterm elections and called on Americans to 'make their voices heard.'" ~~~
Jacob Knutson of Axios: "Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement Friday, in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, that states cannot ban mifepristone, a medication that is used to bring about an abortion, based on disagreement with the federal government on its safety and efficacy.... Already, almost half of U.S. states have banned or tightly restricted abortion pills -- two medicines named mifepristone and misoprostol -- and more could soon follow suit, Axios' Oriana Gonzalez, Ashley Gold and Jacque Schrag report.... Mifepristone and misoprostol have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy.... It is far from settled law as to whether states can ban the pills, and the issue will likely have to be litigated in the courts, though there's really no clear precedent, according to the Washington Post."~~~
~~~ Dareh Gregorian & Ryan Reilly of NBC News: "Legal experts predicted there would be numerous court challenges following Friday's court ruling. Khiara M. Bridges, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, said 'there's an open legal question about whether states could limit the use of mifepristone in light of the FDA's judgment that the medicine is safe and effective. It's not at all clear.' While the FDA can can declare the drug is safe, Bridges said, 'states can regulate the practice of medicine within their borders.'"
~~~ ** Garland's full statement is here, and it's well worth reading.
Kaly Soto of the New York Times: "... the U.S. Supreme Court ruling scrapping the constitutional right to abortion reverberated globally, drawing a wave of responses from world leaders, some of them heated -- 'horrific,' 'a huge setback' -- as denunciation outweighed praise. With the decision overturning Roe v. Wade, the United States joins a handful of countries, like Poland, Russia and Nicaragua, that have rolled back access to the procedure in the last few decades, while more of the world has gone in the other direction."
Josh Dawsey of the Washington Post: "Publicly, [Donald] Trump crowed about the Supreme Court rulings [overturning Roe & the New York gun law] Friday in a triumphant statement released through his super PAC, blasting his usual suspects, including Democrats and the news media.... He has complained privately that the overturning of Roe could hurt Republicans politically in independent and suburban districts, two advisers said, and has told allies they should emphasize that states can set their own laws. Trump has also told some of his advisers he thinks a better position would be to limit but not ban abortion, two of these people said...."
Whatever the exact scope of the coming laws, one result of today's decision is certain: the curtailment of women's rights, and of their status as free and equal citizens.... With sorrow -- for this Court, but more, for the many millions of American women who have today lost a fundamental constitutional protection -- we dissent. -- Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor & Elena Kagan, joint dissent
Robert Barnes, et al., of the Washington Post: "The Supreme Court on Friday overturned the fundamental right to abortion established nearly 50 years ago in Roe v. Wade, a stunning reversal that leaves states free to drastically reduce or even outlaw a procedure that abortion rights groups said is key to women's equality and independence.... The vote was 6 to 3 to uphold a restrictive Mississippi law. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., though, criticized his conservative colleagues for taking the additional step of overturn Roe and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which had reaffirmed the right to abortion.... In a separate opinion, [Clarence] Thomas expressed his support for revisiting other Supreme Court rulings that he and other conservatives believe should be left to individual states. For example, he wrote that the court should move forward with revisiting the right to contraception and the right for same-sex couples to marry.... Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) celebrated the Supreme Court ruing as 'courageous and correct.' 'This is [a] historic victory for the Constitution and for the most vulnerable in our society,' McConnell said in a statement Friday." This is a liveblog. (Also linked yesterday.)
The decision, concurring opinions & dissent are here, via the Supremes' Website. (Also linked yesterday.)
Sam Knows Best. Michael Scherer of the Washington Post: "The U.S. Supreme Court's new majority boldly signaled with twin rulings this week that public opinion would not interfere with conservative plans to shift the nation's legal landscape. The court rejected Roe v. Wade, a 49-year-old legal precedent that guaranteed the right to an abortion, after a string of national polls showed a clear majority of Americans wanted the opposite result. A similar court majority invalidated a 108-year-old New York state law restricting who can carry concealed guns that is supported by nearly 8 in 10 New Yorkers, according to a recent poll by Siena College. Rather than ignore the dissonance, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. ... attacked the notion that the court should consider the public will. He quoted late chief justice William H. Rehnquist from a previous ruling: 'The Judicial Branch derives its legitimacy, not from following public opinion, but from deciding by its best lights.'... The high court during the George W. Bush, Barack Obama and early Donald Trump administrations generally hewed closely to shifting public views on key social issues like same-sex marriage, private sexual conduct, workplace protections for transgender people and popular support for laws and executive orders on immigration and health care."
Charlie Savage of the New York Times: "The Supreme Court's decision on Friday to end the constitutional right to abortion concluded one battle for now but immediately posed another far-reaching question: whether the judicial ground under rights in other personal matters, including contraception and same-sex marriage, is now also shaky.... Justice Clarence Thomas's concurring opinion ... explicitly said that precedents establishing those rights -- which relied on the same legal reasoning as the now-overturned Roe v. Wade -- should be reconsidered.... The three dissenting liberals on the court said..., 'No one ... should be confident that this majority is done with its work.'... Friday's opinion had the immediate effect of allowing laws banning or severely curbing access to abortion to snap into place in at least 20 states.... The heart of Justice Alito's majority opinion is that the 14th Amendment protects only unwritten rights that were already understood to exist in 1868, when it was adopted." ~~~
~~~ Marie: It doesn't matter what the confederates' supposed rationale is; they will do what they want, then go in search of an excuse. And Alito has provided an excuse to take away all hard-earned rights, especially gay rights, inasmuch as I very much doubt gay rights were "understood to exist in 1868." If you are not a straight, white, Christian man, you do not have inalienable rights and you cannot be trusted to make personal decisions.
Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times: "They did it because they could.... The arrogance and unapologetic nature of the opinion are breathtaking.... The practical consequences of the decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, are enormous and severe. Abortion, now one of the most common medical procedures, will be banned or sharply limited in about half the country.... What the court delivered on Friday is a requiem for the right to abortion. As Chief Justice John Roberts, who declined to join Justice Alito's opinion, may well suspect, it is also a requiem for the Supreme Court."
Jill Filipovic of the Guardian: "As of 24 June 2022, the US supreme court should officially be understood as an illegitimate institution -- a tool of minority rule over the majority, and as part of a far-right ideological and authoritarian takeover that must be snuffed out if we want American democracy to survive.... Of the nine justices sitting on the current court, five -- all of them in the majority opinion that overturned Roe -- were appointed by presidents who initially lost the popular vote; the three appointed by Donald Trump were confirmed by senators who represent a minority of Americans. A majority of this court, in other words, were not appointed by a process that is representative of the will of the American people. Two were appointed via starkly undemocratic means, put in place by bad actors willing to change the rules to suit their needs.... Can a country be properly understood as a democracy ... if it subjugates half of its population, putting them into a category of sub-person with fewer rights, freedoms and liberties? The global trend suggests that the answer to that is no.... An authoritarian, patriarchal, white supremacist minority [decided it] should rule" [by attacking the Congress]. The supreme court decision stems from that same rotted root: the idea that a patriarchal minority should have nearly unlimited authority over the majority."
Maureen Dowd of the New York Times: "Over the last three decades, I have witnessed a dismal saga of opportunism, fanaticism, mendacity, concupiscence, hypocrisy and cowardice. This is a story about men gaining power by trading away something that meant little to them compared with their own stature: the rights of women.... [When George H.W. Bush nominated him to the Supreme Court, Clarence] Thomas talked about being raised by his grandparents, sharecroppers from rural Georgia. But on the court he has been cruel, pushing opinions that would grind down the poor and underprivileged. While his wife ran around helping Trump with his coup, Thomas was the senior firebrand in a coup of extremists on the court. They yanked power away from John Roberts and are defying the majority will in this country in ways that are terrifying.... Clarence Thomas, of all people, has helped lead us to where we are, with unaccountable extremists dictating how we live." Dowd calls out Bush I, Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell & Donald Trump, too.
Marie: There's been some happy talk about how American women living in no-abortion states can simply travel out-of-state to get their abortions. That's true -- if the woman is financially-comfortable, has no job or a job that allows her an "abortion holiday," has the status to make her own decisions, and has an "uneventful" pregnancy she wishes to terminate. But that combination of circumstances is not true for many women: some are poor, some might get fired if they take time off from work, some are teenagers living at home, some have conditions that demand immediate attention.
How Maine Outsmarted the Supremes. Aaron Tang in a New York Times op-ed: "Anticipating this week's decision [striking down the state's law prohibiting religious schools from receiving taxpayer aid], Maine lawmakers enacted a crucial amendment to the state's anti-discrimination law last year in order to counteract the expected ruling. The revised law forbids discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation, and it applies to every private school that chooses to accept public funds, without regard to religious affiliation.... By enacting its law, Maine was able to assure its taxpayers that they will not be complicit in discriminating against L.G.B.T.Q. students, because private schools that discriminate will be ineligible for public funds." Tang suggests ways to get around the ruling striking down New York's concealed-carry law.
Emily Cochrane of the New York Times: "Congress gave final approval on Friday to a bipartisan compromise intended to stop dangerous people from accessing firearms, ending nearly three decades of congressional inaction over how to counter gun violence and toughen the nation's gun laws. The House approved the measure 234 to 193 one month to the day after a gunman stormed into an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, and used a semiautomatic rifle to kill 19 children and two teachers, sparking outrage across the country and a flurry of negotiations on Capitol Hill. The measure now heads to President Biden, who is expected to sign it."
Stephanie Lai & Linda Qiu of the New York Times: "The House passed legislation on Friday to extend free meals and other food assistance for children, clearing it for President Biden's signature one week before a series of pandemic-era waivers was set to expire. The bipartisan bill, which passed the Senate on Thursday night by unanimous consent, was a compromise that will prevent children from going hungry creating a lifeline for families beleaguered by inflation and supply chain woes. It was a rare instance of Congress extending a pandemic assistance program, coming as the Biden administration' requests for additional coronavirus aid have stalled amid Republican opposition." MB: So McConnell decided that the day his favorite Supremes forced women to have children would not be a good day to support starving the kids. Good thinking, Mitch.
Jon Swaine & Dalton Bennett of the Washington Post: "The Justice Department and the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol have asked Danish filmmakers for video footage recorded as they followed Trump confidant Roger Stone in the weeks after the 2020 election, according to emails and interviews. During the past three months, the investigators have repeatedly sought access to a 170-hour cache of footage shot for director Christoffer Guldbrandsen's forthcoming documentary on Stone.... That footage was cited in a Washington Post report in March that described Stone's activities [on January 6, 2021], including inside the Willard hotel where he and many other Trump allies were staying. The footage showed that Stone communicated on an encrypted messaging app with leaders of far-right groups, and that he claimed at the time to be in contact with ... Donald Trump. Guldbrandsen has declined the requests, citing the need to maintain journalistic independence and to complete his film."
Clark Won't Answer Committee's Questions, But Tucker's? Sure. Philip Bump of the Washington Post: Thursday evening, the same day the House select committee demonstrated how mid-level DoJ attorney Jeffrey Clark helped advance the plot to overturn the 2020 presidential election, Tucker Carlson invited Clark to appear on his Fox "News" show. "On Wednesday morning, federal law enforcement officials searched Clark's home, confiscating a number of electronic devices. On Thursday evening, Tucker Carlson asked him to opine on the raid.... '... increasingly, Tucker, I don't recognize the country anymore with these kinds of Stasi-like things happening,' [Clark said.]... For Fox News's most popular host, Clark was also useful as a way to push forward his narrative that the government is out to get the political right."
Spencer Hsu of the Washington Post: "A federal judge [Amit Mehta of the D.C. District] on Friday ordered defense attorneys for alleged members of the Oath Keepers charged with seditious conspiracy to disclose whether their legal fees are being paid by anyone other than their clients after prosecutors warned of potential conflicts of interest if former Donald Trump attorney Sidney Powell is helping raise money for some of the legal defense as reported."
Matt Richtel, et al., of the New York Times: "A federal appeals court on Friday granted a temporary reprieve to Juul Labs that will allow it to keep its e-cigarettes on the market, pending further court review of a decision just a day earlier by the Food and Drug Administration to ban sales of the company's products. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued a temporary stay that had been sought by Juul. The brief order by the appeals court cautioned that the stay ... 'should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits.' The stay involves the F.D.A.'s order on Thursday, when the agency said Juul had to stop selling its products because it had provided conflicting and insufficient data that prevented the F.D.A. from assessing the potential health risks of its products."
Way Beyond the Beltway
Ukraine, et al. The New York Times' live update of developments Saturday in Russia's war on Ukraine are here. The Guardian's updates for Saturday are here.