The Commentariat -- Aug. 29, 2013
** NEW. Alan Cowell & Stephen Castle of the New York Times: "... United Nations inspectors headed to the outskirts of Damascus for a third day on Thursday, seeking evidence of chemical attacks, while the British authorities took the unusual step of publishing an intelligence assessment blaming the Syrian government for the deadly onslaught." ...
... ** NEW. Kimberly Dozier & Matt Apuzzo of the AP: "The intelligence linking Syrian President Bashar Assad or his inner circle to an alleged chemical weapons attack is no 'slam dunk,' with questions remaining about who actually controls some of Syria's chemical weapons stores and doubts about whether Assad himself ordered the strike, U.S. intelligence officials say.... A report by the Office of the Director for National Intelligence outlining that evidence against Syria includes a few key caveats -- including acknowledging that the U.S. intelligence community no longer has the certainty it did six months ago of where the regime's chemical weapons are stored, nor does it have proof Assad ordered chemical weapons use." ...
... David Atkins of Hullabaloo: "Intervention in this situation is somewhat perplexing. After watching tens of thousands of Syrians die in a brutal civil war, the United States seems determined to use bombs on a rogue faction of an oppressive regime based on murky intelligence in order not to alter the course of the civil war, but to defend the narrow principle that it's OK to kill people with bombs but not with poisonous gas. That doesn't sound like a great idea." ...
... Ashley Parker of the New York Times: "Lawmakers stepped up their call on Wednesday for President Obama to consult with Congress before ordering a military strike on Syria, with more than 100 House members signing a letter pressing the president to seek a vote before taking action. 'We strongly urge you to consult and receive authorization from Congress before ordering the use of U.S. military force in Syria,' read the letter, signed by 98 Republicans and 18 Democrats."...
... President Obama says he has "not made a decision" on how to proceed regarding Syria:
... Karen DeYoung of the Washington Post: "The Obama administration appeared Wednesday to be forging ahead with preparations to attack Syria. It dismissed a Syrian request to extend chemical weapons inspections there as a delaying tactic and said it saw little point in further discussion of the issue at the United Nations. President Obama said that 'there need to be international consequences' for the Aug. 21 chemical strikes he said he has concluded were carried out by the Syrian government." ...
... Kathleen Hennessey, et al., of the Los Angeles Times: "One U.S. official who has been briefed on the options on Syria said he believed the White House would seek a level of intensity 'just muscular enough not to get mocked' but not so devastating that it would prompt a response from Syrian allies Iran and Russia. 'They are looking at what is just enough to mean something, just enough to be more than symbolic,' he said." ...
... Lara Seligman of the Hill: "Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) on Wednesday expressed outrage over leaks related to possible air strikes on Syria, calling them 'crazy.' McCain pointed to reports that say U.S. air strikes on Syria could begin as early as Friday.... 'But all of these leaks, when strikes are going to take place, where, what's going to be used, if I were [Syrian President] Bashar Assad, I think I would declare tomorrow a snow day and keep everything from work,' McCain said on Fox News. 'This is crazy. These leaks are just crazy.'" ...
... CW: The "crazy leak" by "a U.S. official" to the L.A. Times which I highlighted above almost certainly comes from a top Republican Congressman. (If you can't figure out how I came to that conclusion, I'll provide a close reading. I think it's obvious.)
... Political scientist Charli Carpenter on the (il)legality of a U.S. attack on Syria. Via Eric Voeten in the Monkey Cage. ...
... New York Times Editors: "Despite the pumped-up threats and quickening military preparations, President Obama has yet to make a convincing legal or strategic case for military action against Syria. While there should be some kind of international response to the chemical weapons attack that killed hundreds of civilians last week, Mr. Obama has yet to spell out how that response would effectively deter further use of chemical weapons. For starters, where is the proof that President Bashar al-Assad of Syria carried out the attack? " ...
... Amy Davidson of the New Yorker: "There have been calls for the President to reconvene Congress and put this one before them, and such calls are right. It might even help the Administration figure out what, exactly, it hopes to accomplish by shooting missiles in the general direction of Damascus." That's just what British PM David Cameron is doing. ...
... Jim Fallows agrees with Davidson. "Completely apart from the procedural nicety of involving the rest of the government in authorizing the use of force, [President Obama] has a compelling political interest in spreading the responsibility for this decision." ...
... Steven Myers of the New York Times: "President Vladimir V. Putin has conspicuously avoided public comment on reports of a chemical weapons attack on civilians outside of Damascus, the Syrian capital.... Instead he has carried on, like many ordinary Russians, as if the civil war in Syria had not reached an ominous new phase.... Mr. Putin's public reticence, though, reflects a calculation that Russia can do little to stop a military intervention if the United States and other countries move ahead without the authorization of the United Nations Security Council -- and that he has little to lose at home, at least, if they do." ...
... John Judis of the New Republic has a good overview of the Syrian quagmire. Thanks to contributor P. D. Pepe for the link. ...
... CW: here's my question & one that I've not seen even contemplated. Rather than our sending in, um, "humanitarian" missiles, why not go to the Security Council for a resolution demanding the destruction of the Syrian chemical weapons arsenal? After all, if using chemical weapons violates international law -- and it does -- then there's absolutely no reason to have any. If Syria refused, then some escalation would be indicated. Responses, please. ...
... Time Staff: "On February 9, 1991, the Saturday Night Live cold open captured the press fervor before the Gulf War. As journalists search for scoops before another possible deadly conflict in Syria, it's a sketch worth remembering":
NEW. Ed Pilkington of the Guardian: 'The Obama administration is trying to dissuade federal judges from giving the New York Times reporter James Risen one last chance to avoid having to disclose his source in a criminal trial over the alleged leaking of US state secrets. The Department of Justice has filed a legal argument with the US appeals court for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia, in which it strongly opposes any further consideration of Risen's petition. Risen's lawyers have asked the court to convene a full session of the 15-member court.... A three-member panel of the same court last month issued a 2-1 majority ruling in which they found that reporters had no privilege that would safeguard the confidentiality of their sources in a criminal trial."
Peter Baker & Sheryl Gay Stolberg of the New York Times: "President Obama stepped on Wednesday into the space where the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once stood and summoned his iconic dream of a colorblind society in a celebration of a half-century of progress and a call to arms for the next generation." ...
A great Democracy does not make it harder to vote than to buy an assault weapon. -- President Bill Clinton
... President Jimmy Carter remembers "how it was":
... Dana Milbank: "Rising above it all was Rep. John Lewis, the 73-year-old Georgia Democrat who, as a civil rights leader, spoke at the original march, too. 'When I look out over this diverse crowd and survey the guests on this platform,' he told the audience, 'it seems to realize what Otis Redding was singing about and what Martin Luther King Jr. preached about: This moment in our history has been a long time coming, but a change has come.' It took a voice of '63 to give real meaning to '13."
... The Washington Post's page on the commemoration of the 1963 March on Washington is here. Video of the entire five-hour program is here. ...
... NEW. Remembering J. Edgar Hoover. Annie Laurie of Balloon Juice links to some excellent pieces about Martin Luther King, Jr., & about the government's opposition to him & the civil rights movement. ...
... GOP MIA. Emma Dumain of Roll Call: "Speaker John A. Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor, the House's two most senior Republicans, were invited to speak at the 50th anniversary of the historic March on Washington -- but declined. That wasn't a wise choice, said Julian Bond, a renowned civil rights activist, in an interview with MSNBC on Wednesday afternoon.... 'They asked a long list of Republicans to come,' Bond continued, 'and to a man and woman they said "no." And that they would turn their backs on this event was telling of them, and the fact that they seem to want to get black votes, they're not gonna get 'em this way.'" ...
... Aamer Madhani of USA Today: "Both former Presidents [Bush] were invited to participate in Wednesday's celebration, which will feature speeches from the steps of the Lincoln Memorial by President Obama as well as former presidents Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. But both Bushes are dealing with health issues and decided it best to skip the event." ...
** Alex Seitz-Wald, in a Washington Post post, has an excellent summary of the Republican no-show scandal. CW: (Seitz-Wald doesn't call it a scandal, but I do.) You don't have to be president of your local MLK fan club to honor one of the most significant events in the civil rights movement, especially when you are invited to do so. The fact that Eric Cantor preferred to "honor" oil industry lobbyists & John Boehner preferred to "honor" GOP donors tells you what you need to know about the Republican party.
... Alex Halperin of Salon: Republicans may have been AWOL for the commemoration, but conservative commentators tweeted their reactions.
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. -- Martin Luther King, Jr., August 28, 1963 ...
... Charles Pierce: "That's the great loophole. It is an otherwise unremarkable sentiment given the context of the entire address, but, for the people who almost certainly would have lined up on the other side of the movement in 1963, it subsequently has been used as an opening through which all manner of historically backsliding mischief has come a'wandering in...." Pierce goes on to excoriate the National Review, [which can't be done too often]. "Lincoln won a war. Dr. King led a revolution. They both fought the same enemy, a stubborn, clever enemy that is not yet vanquished." ...
... Ta-Nehisi Coates: "... whenever I see conservatives [like George Will] embracing [Daniel Patrick] Moynihan, I wonder whether they've actually read the report."
Justice Is Not Color-Blind. Nicole Flatow of Think Progress has the shocking statistics on racial discrimination in our criminal "justice" system.
One of Thousands of Examples of Why We Need a Campaign Reform Amendment. Eric Lipton of the New York Times: "Eight months ago, Congress ordered the Obama administration to eliminate a stark example of federal government waste: more than $500 million a year in excessive drug payments being sent to dialysis clinics nationwide. But ... more than 100 of the same members of Congress who voted in January to impose the cut are now trying to push the Obama administration to reverse it or water it down. The conflicting message is due in part to the lobbying muscle of an industry dominated by two companies -- DaVita Healthcare Partners of Denver and Fresenius, based in Germany -- both of which have seen their bottom lines improve since 2011, when the federal government first started making the excessive payments."
Clara Ritger of the National Journal: "Republicans have long blamed President Obama's signature health care initiative for increasing insurance costs, dubbing it the 'Unaffordable Care Act.' Turns out, they might be right. For the vast majority of Americans, premium prices will be higher in the individual exchange than what they're currently paying for employer-sponsored benefits, according to a National Journal analysis of new coverage and cost data. Adding even more out-of-pocket expenses to consumers' monthly insurance bills is a swell in deductibles under the Affordable Care Act." CW: for a number of reasons, I think this analysis may present a false picture. If some experts respond to the piece, I'll post links.
Steve Benen: "... there seems to be a pattern when it comes to the Tea Party: far-right activists are motivated by misleading claims they don't know to be false." The latest is the fake IRS "scandal," which, it turns out, was fueled by Tea Party-produced-and-paid-for complainants. ...
... Speaking of falsehoods that foment the foolish.... Texas Troopers Lie about Shit. Alex Seitz-Wald of Salon: During the Texas state senate battle over a new, restrictive antiabortion law, "the Texas Department of Public safety said that it had confiscated 'one jar suspected to contain urine [and] 18 jars suspected to contain feces.'" After pro-choice protesters denied the claim, the AP investigated: "Texas Department of Public Safety documents show troopers seized no jars of urine or feces from Capitol visitors the day of debate of controversial abortion bill. That's counter to a DPS statement issued the night of the July 12 debate and filibuster...."
Timothy Lee of the Washington Post explains how hackers took down the New York Times Website. Basically, they redirected the domain name (DNS) to another IP address. ...
... Paresh Dave of the Los Angeles Times has a less comprehensible but more specific explanation.
Gail Collins, Sports Sleuth: Yes, Billie Jean King really did beat Bobby Riggs in the 1973 tennis match dubbed "Battle of the Sexes." Don't believe everything you hear on ESPN. Collins notes that to realize the significance of the match, "You had to be there." I was working at ABC-TV at the time, & I watched the game with the handsome guy who played Dr. Ben Casey on a TV show of approximately the same name. I can't remember the actor's name, but I recall the match & my joy at Billie Jean's win.
News Ledes
Daily Telegraph: "Kim Jong-un's ex-girlfriend was among a dozen well-known North Korean performers who were executed by firing squad nine days ago, according to South Korean reports. Hyon Song-wol, a singer, rumoured to be a former lover of the North Korean leader, is said to have been arrested on Aug 17 with 11 others for violating laws against pornography. 'They were executed with machine guns while the key members of the Unhasu Orchestra, Wangjaesan Light Band and Moranbong Band as well as the families of the victims looked on,' said a Chinese source reported in the newspaper."
Reuters: "Fast-food workers went on strike and protested outside McDonald's, Burger King and other restaurants in 60 U.S. cities on Thursday, in the largest protest of an almost year-long campaign to raise service sector wages. Rallies were held in cities from New York to Oakland and stretched into the South, historically difficult territory for organized labor. The striking workers say they want to unionize without retaliation in order to collectively bargain for a 'living wage.'"
New York Times: "The N.F.L. agreed to pay $765 million to settle a lawsuit brought by more than 4,500 retirees with advanced dementia and other health problems as well as the families of players who have died from what they claimed were the long-terms effects of head trauma."
Guardian: "The US Department of Defense announced on Thursday it has released two men from Guantánamo Bay prison to their home nation of Algeria. A Pentagon statement said that the men, Nabil Said Hadjarab and Mutia Sadiq Ahmad Sayyab, had been approved for transfer after a review directed by President Obama.... The move brings the number of detainees in Guantánamo down to 164."
AP: "Striving to take action where Congress would not, the Obama administration announced new steps Thursday on gun control, curbing the import of military surplus weapons and proposing to close a little-known loophole that lets felons and others circumvent background checks by registering guns to corporations."