Guns and Good Manners

The Times moderators have held back my comments on Gail Collins' & Charles Blow's columns. So here they are:

Gail Collins: "Congress really has been looking a little more civil. Not quite Athens in the age of Pericles, but it’s very possible that this year we’ll get through the State of the Union address without anybody jumping up to scream insults at the president."

The Constant Weader's reply:

The trouble with all this civility is that it masks the reality of what Republicans are hiding behind their new good manners offensive. The House Republican Study Committee, which includes something like two-thirds of the Republican members, has rolled out a plan to cut back spending by $2.5 trillion over the next ten years. Having given a massive tax break to millionaires & billionaires, the newly-civilized ladies & gentlemen now propose that the rest of us sacrifice. Of the Study Group's proposal, Steve Benen says, "if lawmakers were to get together to plot how Congress could deliberately increase unemployment, their plan would look an awful lot like this one."

Jobs for Americans evidently aren't a component of the new civility. When asked about jobs, Speaker Boehner told reporters that the Congress had other priorities: "a ban on taxpayer funding of abortions across all federal programs," he asserted, "is one of our highest legislative priorities." Well, he said it politely.

Besides cutting thousands of public jobs, the House has some other great cost-cutting ideas: "eliminate or decimate: the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Title X birth control and family planning, AmeriCorps, the Energy Star program and work on fuel efficient cars, and the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change." [Dana Milbank] If all this sounds vaguely familiar to you, it's because you heard it back in 1995, when the decidedly uncivil Newt Gingrich became Speaker. It's the Contract on America, dusted off &, now, thanks to that cost-saving paperless policy, slapped up online.

Oh, there's more that has got to go -– Amtrak subsidies, food safety inspections, mine safety inspections, fair wages on government contracts. Sissy stuff, favored by East Coast elites.

Of course, repealing the Affordable Care Act -– the House's big legislative "accomplishment" of the week -- is about as uncivil as a Congress member can get. Depriving millions of Americans of an opportunity to obtain affordable medical care – while refusing to give up their own government healthcare plans, of course – is an act of gross incivility no matter how nicely you say it. I’ll take "You lie!" over "You die!" *

As for comparing Republican talking points to Nazi propaganda -– that's just stupid. The House Republican plan stands on its own as a low water mark for legislative depravity. Ad hominem comparisons are superfluous.

So. A good start? People in power can do a lot to unravel civil society even while they maintain courtly demeanors. That's what House Republicans are doing now. In my view, their sadistic actions are all the more vicious when they carry them out with smiles on their faces.

* See the link to the post by Jim White of Firedoglake above. It looks as if Congressman Wilson has figured out a way to combine "You lie!" and "You die!"

Charles Blow: "Pre-presidency, Obama had been a strong supporter of gun-control initiatives. Since then, however, he has remained curiously quiet on the issue in general and following the Tucson shooting in particular. The question now is: which Obama will show up at the State of the Union?"

The Constant Weader sez:

When even Dick Cheney of quail-hunting fame came out in support of semi-automatic gun control this week, how much courage does it take for a Democratic President to do the same? Whether he says it in the State of the Union address or in some other venue, President Obama must get behind an assault weapons ban during this first semester of the new Congress, while there is a still a public will to reinstitute the law. To do less would be a gross disservice to the nation.

As Nicholas Kristof said last week, gun control is a health issue. Arguably, more people are dying for want of gun control than are dying for lack of health insurance. President Obama should not be sending his wife out in praise of Wal-Mart, which has promised to phase more healthful foods into its product line, if he is going to allow some of those new healthy eaters to be mowed down by assault weapons.

The Commentariat -- January 21

** Best Blogpost Ever on Court Challenges to the Affordable Care Law. Rick Ungar of Forbes (of all places), in a post titled, "Congress Passes Socialized Medicine and Mandates Health Insurance...":

In July of 1798, Congress passed – and President John Adams signed - 'An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen.' The law authorized the creation of a government operated marine hospital service and mandated that privately employed sailors be required to purchase health care insurance.

Keep in mind that the 5th Congress did not really need to struggle over the intentions of the drafters of the Constitutions in creating this Act as many of its members were the drafters of the Constitution.

Steve Benen on Joe Lieberman -- still able to get "foreign policy AND feminism wrong at the same time."

I'm posting this for the behind-the-scenes stuff, which I love:

CW: Mary Williams Walsh of the New York Times writes what I think is an alarming report on what some policymakers are advocating for cash-strapped states: bankruptcy, including reneging on pension obligations to retirees. My friend Peter S. directs you to the most recommended comment by Zeppo.

Jeffrey Immelt in a Washington Post op-ed: "President Obama has asked me to chair his new President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.... The president and I are committed to a candid and full dialogue among business, labor and government...." (See today's news.) ...

... Read Marcy Wheeler on Jeff Immelt: "... no matter how many times Immelt gets up on a podium or in an op-ed and feigns an interest in American jobs, his actions make him the poster child for everything wrong with the U.S. economy right now." Marcy embeds this terrific clip from Bernie Sanders' Senate "filibuster":

... Also, please read Melissa McEwan on Obama's choice of Immelt. I can't match her sarcasm, but she perfectly captures my sense of the pick. ...

... Pat Garofalo of the Wonk Room: "... due to a corporate tax system that is loophole-ridden and full of giveaways, General Electric pays a pittance in corporate income tax. Though the statutory corporate income tax rate is 35 percent, GE last year paid a paltry 3.6 percent. In 2009, despite making $10.3 billion in pretax income, GE paid nothing in corporate income tax (and, in fact, received $1.1 billion in tax benefits)." ...

... The new chairman of our "Council on Jobs" is what you might accurately call a "jobs-killer."

Noam Scheiber in The New Republic on President Obama's Wall Street Journal op-ed piece re: regulatory reform. Here's the President's piece. Scheiber's analysis is pretty illuminating.

Ezra Klein: "It's the age of civility in American politics, but there's one institution that's been civil all along: the Congressional Budget Office.... The nonpartisan agency ... speaks in the polite language of actuarial tables, refuses to reliably please or disappoint either party and is the closest thing American politics has to an umpire. And the Republicans are getting sick and tired of it."

Jonathan Martin of Politico: Dick Armey to House Republican Tea Party members: "Curb your enthusiasm." Includes three videos of Dick Armey talking, none of which I even clicked on. CW: my friend Kate Madison warned at least a year ago that Armey, a big financial backer of the TP, would try to make regular Republicans out of any tea party members who made it to Congress. Let's see how that goes. ...

... David Herszenhorn of the New York Times: "House Republican leaders confronted pressure from conservatives on Thursday to take more aggressive steps to cut federal spending, with a large group of lawmakers calling for outlays to be slashed by $2.5 trillion over the next decade, far more than the party has sought so far." ...

... Steve Benen: "The likelihood of these cuts actually passing is non-existent, but it is a helpful snapshot of Republican priorities. But also note perhaps the most important detail about a plan such as this one: it would be devastating for American jobs. Indeed, if lawmakers were to get together to plot how Congress could deliberately increase unemployment, their plan would look an awful lot like this one. The RSC proposal would deliberately fire thousands of civilian workers, force states to make sweeping job cuts, and lay off thousands more who work in transportation and infrastructure." ...

... David Dayan of Firedoglake: "The value in [the Republican Study Committee's spending cuts] document is knowing that the battle lines have been drawn.... The end of the continuing resolution on March 4, as well as the need to increase the debt limit, hang out there over the horizon."

As the Worms Turn. AP: Justices Scalia & Thomas try to explain away their relationship with Charles Koch, one of the brothers who have benefited from the Citzens United ruling, in which Scalia & Thomas were in the majority. The Supremes look shady to me. But you decide. Here's the New York Times' backstory, which I linked to yesterday.

Another reason DADT was stupid. Mark Thompson of Time: "The Government Accountability Office has concluded it cost U.S. taxpayers nearly $200 million to oust 3,664 service personnel for violating the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' law between 2004 to 2009.... That works out to $52,800 per person."

Floyd Norris of the New York Times suggests a new chapter for Gail Collins' proposed book, Everything Bad Is Joe Lieberman's Fault. Norris says had it not been for Lieberman's insistence in 1994 upon allowing fantastical stock-option accounting, "some of the worst excesses of the technology stock bubble might have been avoided."

AP: "Rep. Gabrielle Giffords left a Tucson hospital Friday and is being flown to a Houston rehabilitation center for her next steps in her recovery, less than two weeks after the congresswoman was shot in the head. Well-wishers ... lined the ambulance's route between the hospital and Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, where Giffords was loaded on a specially outfitted jet." ...

     ... Washington Post Update: "Rep. Gabrielle Giffords's transfer Friday from a Tucson trauma center to a Houston hospital went 'flawlessly,' and she will begin rehabilitation right away, doctors said."

Michelle Obama is killing people on the streets! Jason Linkins mocks the Daily Caller's latest lunacy.

President Obama on the 50th Anniversary of President John F. Kennedy's inauguration. Scroll down for JFK's inaugural address:

Don't Taze Me, Bro'

Tim Egan of the New York Times reports statistics that contradict & disprove the popular myth that an armed citizenry makes for a safer America. For one thing, people "with guns were four times more likely to be shot when confronted by an armed assailant than those without guns." And for another, Hawaii -- the state with the lowest rate of gun ownership -- has the lowest gun death rate in the country. Louisiana, by contrast, has the highest gun owership rate -- and of course the highest gun death rate in the country. Pass it on.

Once again, the Times has held back my comment, so here it is:

Like a good tea partier, I want to go back to the good old days of the Founding Fathers. I want my Second Amendment right to form a militia. We haven't had any state militias since something like the 1830s, & I'm hankering to form one. Without militias, the Second Amendment has been made moot. Think I'm wrong? Ask ultra-conservative Judge Robert Bork. In 1989, he said, the Second Amendment "guarantee[s] the right of states to form militias, not for individuals to bear arms.”

Not good enough for ya because Bork got Borked? Well, here's Republican Warren Burger, a former Chief Justice, on the same subject. He said that the N.R.A.’s interpretation of the Second Amendment was “one of the greatest pieces of fraud, I repeat the word ‘fraud,’ on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime.”

Okay, so that doesn't mean guns must be illegal, just because we don't have militias & the modern Court has allowed the NRA to perpetrate a fraud on the nation. So, with the tea partiers, let's go back to the 1790s & let everybody carry a musket. Keep your powder dry, boys.

An obsession with guns is a form of insanity unique to certain elements in this country & to terrorists, insurrectionists, the Mafia & drug cartels. The rest of us need to do all we can to end the madness in this country.

You want personal protection & a musket just won't do? Many states allow citizens to carry Tasers. Studies show a Taser does a lot better job at disabling an armed intruder (without killing him) than a gun does. And if you use a Taser instead of a gun on an intruder, you won't have to live the rest of your life knowing you killed a punk over an old TV & your laptop.