The Commentariat -- May 22, 2015
Internal links removed.
Paul Kane & Mike DeBonis of the Washington Post: "Republicans and a small band of Democrats rescued President Obama's trade agenda from the brink of failure Thursday, clearing a key hurdle in the Senate but leaving the final outcome in doubt. Supporters must still navigate a set of tricky-but-popular proposals that could torpedo the legislation's chances, and its fate in the House remains a tossup because Obama faces entrenched opposition from his own party." ...
... Paul Krugman: "I don't know why the president has chosen to make the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership such a policy priority.... Reasonable, well-intentioned people have serious questions about what's going on. And I would have expected a good-faith effort to answer those questions.... Instead, the selling of the 12-nation Pacific Rim pact has the feel of a snow job. Officials have evaded the main concerns about the content of a potential deal; they've belittled and dismissed the critics; and they've made blithe assurances that turn out not to be true.... The main thrust of the proposed deal involves strengthening intellectual property rights -- things like drug patents and movie copyrights -- and changing the way companies and countries settle disputes. And it's by no means clear that either of those changes are good for America.... The fact that the administration evidently doesn't feel that it can make an honest case for the Trans-Pacific Partnership suggests that this isn't a deal we should support."
Coral Davenport of the New York Times: "The Obama administration is expected in the coming days to announce a major clean water regulation that would restore the federal government's authority to limit pollution in the nation's rivers, lakes, streams and wetlands. Environmentalists have praised the new rule, calling it an important step that would lead to significantly cleaner natural bodies of water and healthier drinking water. But it has attracted fierce opposition from several business interests, including farmers, property developers, fertilizer and pesticide makers, oil and gas producers and a national association of golf course owners. Opponents contend that the rule would stifle economic growth and intrude on property owners' rights."
Jennifer Steinhauer of the New York Times: "With the federal government's bulk collection of phone records set to expire in June, senators remained deeply divided on Thursday over whether to extend the program temporarily or accept significant changes that the House overwhelmingly approved last week."
Jeffrey Goldberg of the Atlantic: "'Look, 20 years from now, I'm still going to be around, God willing. If Iran has a nuclear weapon, it's my name on this,' [President Obama] said [to Goldberg during a interview], referring to the apparently almost-finished nuclear agreement between Iran and a group of world powers led by the United States. 'I think it's fair to say that in addition to our profound national-security interests, I have a personal interest in locking this down.'..." Read the whole post, which covers a lot of Middle East territory.
Eric Licthblau & Maggie Haberman of the New York Times: Karl "Rove's Crossroads PAC is no longer [the' GOP's 'big dog.'... The nonprofit arm of Crossroads is facing an Internal Revenue Service review that could eviscerate its fund-raising. Data projects nurtured by Mr. Rove are being supplanted in Republican circles by a more successful initiative funded by the Koch political network, which has leapfrogged the Crossroads organizations in size and reach. And the group faces intense competition for donors from a new wave of 'super PACs' that are being set up by backers of the leading Republican candidates for president, who are unwilling to defer to Mr. Rove's authority or cede strategic and fund-raising dominance to the organizations he helped start."
Greg Sargent: If the Supreme Court knocks out the Medicaid subsidy for states without their own exchanges, "Republicans do have a plan of sorts.... [They] may try to pass a temporary patch for the subsidies, packaged with something like the repeal of the individual mandate, in hopes of drawing a presidential veto -- so Republicans can then try to blame Obama for failing to fix the problem. Today, the Wall Street Journal editorial page helpfully confirms that this idea is very much in circulation, urging Republicans to carry out this strategy. The editorial suggests Republicans rally behind plans such as the one offered by GOP Senator Ron Johnson, which would temporarily grant subsidies to those who lose them." ...
... Sarah Ferris of the Hill: "A number of states are quietly considering merging their healthcare exchanges under ObamaCare amid big questions about their cost and viability. Many of the 13 state-run ObamaCare exchanges are worried about how they'll survive once federal dollars supporting them run dry next year. Others are contemplating creating multi-state exchanges as a contingency plan for a looming Supreme Court ruling expected next month that could prevent people from getting subsidies to buy ObamaCare on the federal exchange."
Charles Pierce: "... anyone who wonders why Congressman Trey Gowdy of South Carolina is an odious presence in our politics should have caught his act this week. The House Judiciary Committee was holding hearings concerning the current state of America's police as regards their relationship with communities of color.... Gowdy's questioning [of a witness] was one prolonged and demagogic sneer, listing off the names of police officers who have died in the line, and of African Americans who were killed by other African Americans.... Gowdy played every old and familiar tune on the House organ."
Erik Eckholm of the New York Times: "Robert M. Gates, the president of the Boy Scouts of America and former secretary of defense, called on Thursday to end the Scouts' ban on gay adult leaders, warning the group's executives that 'we must deal with the world as it is, not as we might wish it to be.' Speaking at the Boy Scouts' annual national meeting in Atlanta, Mr. Gates said cascading events -- including potential employment discrimination lawsuits and the impending Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage, as well as mounting internal dissent over the exclusionary policy -- had led him to conclude that the current rules 'cannot be sustained.'"
Ian Black of the Guardian: "Islamic State's victories in Palmyra and Ramadi have been painful blows for the US-led coalition in both Syria and Iraq respectively, underlining the flaws in a strategy that has been widely criticised as both wrong-headed and half-hearted." ...
... Juan Cole: "... the whole debate about 'who lost Ramadi?' assumes facts not in evidence, i.e. that Ramadi has ever been 'pacified' or somehow a United States protectorate, sort of like Guam or Puerto Rico.... So it completely escapes me why John McCain, Lindsey Graham, John Boehner or Tom Cotton (who helped personally with the berlinization of Iraq) think that if only US troops had remained in country after 2011, the people of Ramadi would have been delirious with joy and avoided throwing in with radical anti-imperialist forces." ...
... Gene Robinson: "President Obama's critics are missing the point.... The simple truth is that if Iraqis will not join together to fight for a united and peaceful country, there will be continuing conflict and chaos that potentially threaten American interests. We should be debating how best to contain and minimize the threat. Further escalating the U.S. military role, I would argue, will almost surely lead to a quagmire that makes us no more secure. If the choice is go big or go home, we should pick the latter." ...
... See also Jeffrey Goldberg's interview of President Obama, linked above. ...
... if the Iraqis themselves are not willing or capable to arrive at the political accommodations necessary to govern, if they are not willing to fight for the security of their country, we cannot do that for them. -- President Obama, in the Goldberg interview
... Steve Benen: "Last week, Republicans were heavily invested in a specific talking point: don't blame George W. Bush for the disastrous war in Iraq, blame the intelligence community. This week, this has clearly been replaced with a full-throated replacement talking point: don't blame George W. Bush or the intelligence community, blame President Obama."
Charles Pierce recommends this "Frontline" documentary on the CIA torture program.
Presidential Race
Rosalind Helderman & Tom Hamburger of the Washington Post: "The Clinton Foundation reported Thursday that it has received as much as $26.4 million in previously undisclosed payments from major corporations, universities, foreign sources and other groups. The disclosure came as the foundation faced questions over whether it fully complied with a 2008 ethics agreement to reveal its donors and whether any of its funding sources present conflicts of interest for Hillary Rodham Clinton as she begins her presidential campaign. The money was paid as fees for speeches by Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton. Foundation officials said the funds were tallied internally as 'revenue' rather than donations, which is why they had not been included in the public listings of its contributors published as part of the 2008 agreement." CW: As a slap-dash, after-the-fact, keeper of my own financial records, I appear to be overqualified to serve as the Clinton Foundation's accountant. ...
... Friends of Bigwigs. Francis Wilkinson of Bloomberg: "Republican complaints about Clinton's wealth and connections are presumably intended to turn the left wing of the Democratic Party against her. But in November 2016 the Republican candidate for president will almost certainly be a man who will have not only accepted hundreds of millions from 'big wigs' -- just as Clinton will have -- but who will also have promised, in an age of burgeoning plutocracy and rising inequality, to engineer a massive transfer of wealth from poor to rich to provide those big wigs with a windfall on their political investment.... But Clinton's policy platform ... will not, for example, take money out of middle-class voters' paychecks, undermine their health insurance, ramp up carbon pollution in their air or leave their children with additional trillions in national debt to finance better living for billionaires.... The 2016 Republican candidates are vastly superior to those of 2012.... It's unclear how much the higher quality of candidates will matter, however, because the party is very much the same. Its donors and activists continue to make demands -- more tax cuts! never compromise! -- that no rational, public-spirited candidate for national office should ever honor."
Cheap Little Rich Girl. Michelle Conlin of Reuters: "Twelve of about 30 people who worked on [Carly] Fiorina's failed 2010 California Senate campaign, most speaking out for the first time, told Reuters they would not work for her again.... The reason: for more than four years, Fiorina - who has an estimated net worth of up to $120 million - didn't pay them.... 'I'd rather go to Iraq than work for Carly Fiorina again,' said one high-level former campaign staffer...."
Beyond the Beltway
Justin Fenton of the Baltimore Sun: "Baltimore grand jury returned indictments against the six officers charged earlier this month in the in-custody death of Freddie Gray, State's Attorney Marilyn J. Mosby announced Thursday. Prosecutors presented evidence to the grand jury over the course of two weeks, Mosby said. Reckless endangerment charges were added against all six officers, while false imprisonment charges against three were removed. The remaining charges are largely the same ones her office filed May 1, following an independent investigation."
Max Ehrenfreund of the Washington Post shows just how bad Kansas's latest punative poor law is for poor families & adds, "... the new provision limiting what the poor can do with their debit cards is causing particular problems for Kansas because it could conflict with federal rules that appear to require that states provide beneficiaries with 'adequate access' to their benefits, putting more than $100 million in funding for the program in jeopardy." CW: Think about this: the law limits beneficiaries from withdrawing more than $25/day from their debit cards, but ATMs dole out cash only in $20 increments, plus there's a fee. In addition, the poor person has to get herself to an ATM, & there may not be one in her neighborhood. And what about the kids? I guess she'll have to pay a babysitter while she walks to an ATM half-an-hour away? So $18 minus sitter fees. Try paying the rent with that.
Way Beyond
Henry McDonald of the Guardian: "Polls have opened in Ireland, where voters are making history as the republic becomes the first nation to ask its electorate to legalise gay marriage. More than 3m voters have been invited to cast ballots in Ireland's 43 constituencies, with the result to follow on Saturday. Polling stations opened at 7am BST and they close at 10pm." ...
... Douglas Dalby of the New York Times: "In 1993, Ireland was among the last countries in the Western World to decriminalize homosexuality. Some 22 years later, it could become the first to legalize same-sex marriages by popular vote.... A vote in favor is far from assured."