The Ledes

Thursday, September 19, 2024

New York Times: “A body believed to be of the suspect in a Kentucky highway shooting that left five people seriously injured this month was found on Wednesday, the authorities said, ending a manhunt that stretched into a second week and set the local community on edge. The Kentucky State Police commissioner, Phillip Burnett Jr., said in a Wednesday night news conference that at approximately 3:30 p.m., two troopers and two civilians found an unidentified body in the brush behind the highway exit where the shooting occurred.... The police have identified the suspect of the shooting as Joseph A. Couch, 32. They said that on Sept. 7, Mr. Couch perched on a cliff overlooking Interstate 75 about eight miles north of London, Ky., and opened fire. One of the wounded was shot in the face, and another was shot in the chest. A dozen vehicles were riddled with gunfire.”

The Wires
powered by Surfing Waves
Help!

To keep the Conversation going, please help me by linking news articles, opinion pieces and other political content in today's Comments section.

Link Code:   <a href="URL">text</a>

OR here's a link generator. The one I had posted died, but Akhilleus found this new one that he says is easy to use.

OR you can always just block, copy and paste to your comment the URL (Web address) of the page you want to link.

Note for Readers. It is not possible for commenters to "throw" their highlighted links to another window. But you can do that yourself. Right-click on the link and a drop-down box will give you choices as to where you want to open the link: in a new tab, new window or new private window.

Thank you to everyone who has been contributing links to articles & other content in the Comments section of each day's "Conversation." If you're missing the comments, you're missing some vital links.

The New York Times lists Emmy winners. The AP has an overview story here.

New York Times: “Hvaldimir, a beluga whale who had captured the public’s imagination since 2019 after he was spotted wearing a harness seemingly designed for a camera, was found dead on Saturday in Norway, according to a nonprofit that worked to protect the whale.... [Hvaldimir] was wearing a harness that identified it as “equipment” from St. Petersburg. There also appeared to be a camera mount. Some wondered if the whale was on a Russian reconnaissance mission. Russia has never claimed ownership of the whale. If Hvaldimir was a spy, he was an exceptionally friendly one. The whale showed signs of domestication, and was comfortable around people. He remained in busier waters than are typical for belugas....” ~~~

     ~~~ Marie: Oh, Lord, do not let Bobby Kennedy, Jr., near that carcass. ~~~

     ~~~ AP Update: “There’s no evidence that a well-known beluga whale that lived off Norway’s coast and whose harness ignited speculation it was a Russian spy was shot to death last month as claimed by animal rights groups, Norwegian police said Monday.... Police said that the Norwegian Veterinary Institute conducted a preliminary autopsy on the animal, which was become known as 'Hvaldimir,' combining the Norwegian word for whale — hval — and the first name of Russian President Vladimir Putin. 'There are no findings from the autopsy that indicate that Hvaldimir has been shot,' police said in a statement.”

New York Times: Botswana's “President Mokgweetsi Masisi grinned as he lifted the diamond, a 2,492-carat stone that is the biggest diamond unearthed in more than a century and the second-largest ever found, according to the Vancouver-based mining operator Lucara, which owns the mine where it was found. This exceptional discovery could bring back the luster of the natural diamond mining industry, mining companies and experts say. The diamond was discovered in the same relatively small mine in northeastern Botswana that has produced several of the largest such stones in living memory. Such gemstones typically surface as a result of volcanic activity.... The diamond will likely sell in the range of tens of millions of dollars....”

Click on photo to enlarge.

~~~ Guardian: "On a distant reef 16,000km from Paris, surfer Gabriel Medina has given Olympic viewers one of the most memorable images of the Games yet, with an airborne celebration so well poised it looked too good to be true. The Brazilian took off a thundering wave at Teahupo’o in Tahiti on Monday, emerging from a barrelling section before soaring into the air and appearing to settle on a Pacific cloud, pointing to the sky with biblical serenity, his movements mirrored precisely by his surfboard. The shot was taken by Agence France-Presse photographer Jérôme Brouillet, who said “the conditions were perfect, the waves were taller than we expected”. He took the photo while aboard a boat nearby, capturing the surreal image with such accuracy that at first some suspected Photoshop or AI." 

Washington Post: “'Mary Cassatt at Work' is a large and mostly satisfying exhibition devoted to the career of the great American artist beloved for her sensitive and often sentimental views of family life. The 'at work' in the title of the Philadelphia Museum of Art show references the curators’ interest in Cassatt’s pioneering effort to establish herself as a professional artist within a male-dominated field. Throughout the show, which includes some 130 paintings, pastels, prints and drawings, the wall text and the art on view stresses Cassatt’s fixation on art as a career rather than a pastime.... Mary Cassatt at Work is on view at the Philadelphia Museum of Art through Sept. 8. philamuseum.org

New York Times: “Bob Newhart, who died on Thursday at the age of 94, has been such a beloved giant of popular culture for so long that it’s easy to forget how unlikely it was that he became one of the founding fathers of stand-up comedy. Before basically inventing the hit stand-up special, with the 1960 Grammy-winning album 'The Button-Down Mind of Bob Newhart' — that doesn’t even count his pay-per-view event broadcast on Canadian television that some cite as the first filmed special — he was a soft-spoken accountant who had never done a set in a nightclub. That he made a classic with so little preparation is one of the great miracles in the history of comedy.... Bob Newhart holds up. In fact, it’s hard to think of a stand-up from that era who is a better argument against the commonplace idea that comedy does not age well.”

Washington Post: “An early Titian masterpiece — once looted by Napolean’s troops and a part of royal collections for centuries — caused a stir when it was stolen from the home of a British marquess in 1995. Seven years later, it was found inside an unassuming white and blue plastic bag at a bus stop in southwest London by an art detective, and returned. This week, the oil painting 'The Rest on the Flight into Egypt' sold for more than $22 million at Christie’s. It was a record for the Renaissance artist, whom museums describe as the greatest painter of 16th-century Venice. Ahead of the sale in April, the auction house billed it as 'the most important work by Titian to come to the auction market in more than a generation.'”

Washington Post: The Folger Shakespeare Library in Washington, D.C., which houses the world's largest collection of Shakespeare material, has undergone a major renovation. "The change to the building is pervasive, both subtle and transformational."

Contact Marie

Click on this link to e-mail Marie.

Constant Comments

A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves. -- Edward R. Murrow

Publisher & Editor: Marie Burns


Monday
Nov182019

The Commentariat -- November 19, 2019

 

Michael Shear of the New York Times is live-updating the hearings. Lede @ 1 pm ET: "The top Ukraine expert at the National Security Council testified that President Trump's call with Ukraine's president in which Mr. Trump asked for investigations of former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was 'inappropriate' and 'a partisan play,' as Republicans raised questions about his loyalty and professionalism." Mrs. McC: Well-worth reading if -- as I did -- you missed the morning's testimony. The Republicans on the committee, especially Nunes & Jordan, have embarrassed the nation yet again. ~~~

     ~~~ Times reporters are making their snarky comments here. (Also includes video feed.) Sample: Katie Rogers: White House staff are using "the official White House account for a political attack." David Sanger (in a tweet): "... in a qtr. century here I have not previously seen an official WH account or press release questioning the competence of an official currently working in that WH. If they had concerns about his judgment, why was he there?"

     ~~~ Update. Mrs. McCrabbie: As far as I can tell, @ 4 pm ET, the Times reporters do not seem to be remarking on the afternoon hearing, although they indicated earlier that they would. The Times live updates, however, are continuing, with Peter Baker taking over.

~~~ The Washington Post's live updates, by John Wagner & Colby Itkowitz, are here. There's a video livefeed here & on the front page of the WashPo. ~~~

~~~ Carol Leonnig of the Washington Post: "Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman told a House investigative committee Tuesday that he spoke to an intelligence official about President Trump's July 25 request that Ukraine investigate his political opponents, but he declined to identify the official when pressed to do so. His refusal came as Rep. Devin Nunes (Calif.), the House Intelligence Committee's ranking Republican -- who kicked off the hearing by calling for the testimony of the whistleblower whose complaint launched the impeachment investigation -- asked witnesses to identify anyone outside the White House with whom they shared details of Trump's phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Republicans used the exchange to raise questions about whether Vindman was the source for information that ended up in the whistleblower's complaint, which alleged that Trump appeared to have abused his public office for personal political gain." ~~~

~~~ Politico's highlights report is here. ~~~

~~~ Axios reprints the transcript of Alexander Vindman's opening statement.

~~~ Tina Nguyen of Politico: "On another day of wall-to-wall impeachment hearings..., Donald Trump convened his Cabinet to push the message that he's focused on everything but impeachment. The focus didn't last long. He could not resist the urge to share his take on the news of the day -- and finally comment on the fevered speculation that he'd experienced a medical emergency over the weekend.... It was Trump's first public appearance since his mysterious and unscheduled trip to Walter Reed Medical Center on Saturday, a sudden hospital visit that spurred rampant speculation about his health in recent days." Trump denounced Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, the "dangerous" press, said he doesn't know who Alexander Vindman is. "Ahead of the meeting, the White House said 'the American people will hear updates on the Trump Cabinet's whole-of-government approach to supporting America's veterans.' Trump himself did not discuss veterans during the 16 minutes the press was present." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: Trump said the when he told Melanie he was going to Walter Reed for a physical, "My wife said, 'Oh darling, that's wonderful.'" I suspect Trump thinks that's the way wives should address their husbands & the way wives should react to whatever decisions their husbands make. I'd be surprised if Melanie really said "Oh, Darling, that's wonderful." ~~~

     ~~~ Oh Wait, There's More. Caitlyn Oprysko of Politico: "Speaking before a Cabinet meeting at the White House, Trump ... told reporters that he was greeted by a panicked first lady and communications department when he arrived back at the White House due to media coverage of the trip. 'I went for a physical. and I came back and my wife said, "Darling are you OK?... Oh they're reporting you may have had a heart attack,"' Trump explained." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: So with a fine medical team in the White House capable of administering standard tests, Trump went on an unscheduled, off-the-record trip to Walter Reed, without informing staff there he was on his way, and without even telling his wife. A real husband would discuss his plans with his wife beforehand. Even if the visit to Walter Reed were necessitated by a medical emergency, a real husband (and/or -- in this case -- his staff) would make sure his wife knew what was happening. Instead, we're supposed to believe the "sick, dangerous" press had "panicked" Melanie, who had no other way of knowing what was going on. Not only is Trump a liar, he doesn't seem to know how stupid his lies are.

Deirdre Walsh of NPR reports the schedule of witness testimony, which begins today at 9 am ET with Col. Alexander Vindman & ends Thursday with testimony from Fiona Hill, scheduled to begin at 9 am ET. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

~~~ Jamie Gangel & Kristen Holmes of CNN: "The House Intelligence Committee will have David Holmes, the counselor for political affairs at the US Embassy in Ukraine, testifying alongside former White House official Fiona Hill on Thursday, according to the Democratic aide. The addition of Holmes means nine individuals will testify publicly as witnesses in the House impeachment probe this week. Holmes' testimony is making some GOP members worry about how far [Gordon] Sondland will go in his public testimony on Wednesday and two senior Republican sources say that some House Republicans are worried about how Sondland will handle himself at the hearing." ~~~

~~~ If Sondland shows up Wednesday & testifies truthfully, what are the odds that Trump will tweet-fire him mid-hearing?

Peter Baker, et al., of the New York Times: "Kurt D. Volker, the former special envoy to Ukraine, plans to tell lawmakers on Tuesday that he was out of the loop at key moments during President Trump's pressure campaign on Ukraine to turn up damaging information about Democrats, according to an account of his prepared testimony. As the House Intelligence Committee opens its second week of public impeachment hearings, Mr. Volker will say that he did not realize that others working for Mr. Trump were tying American security aid to a commitment to investigate Democrats. His testimony, summarized by a person informed about it who insisted on anonymity..., will seek to reconcile his previous closed-door description of events with conflicting versions offered subsequently by other witnesses. Mr. Volker will be one of four witnesses appearing before the committee on Tuesday.... Mr. Volker, who offered a blander description of the meeting in his original testimony, plans to say on Tuesday that he does not challenge any of the new testimony but did not remember hearing the comments." The story also covers other developments in the impeachment inquiry. ~~~

~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: If you want to get into the weeds, Ryan Goodman, in Just Security, will take you there: "Volker's testimony was unfavorable to the President and Giuliani in many respects. However in other important instances, Volker denied allegations about his own wrongdoing and the existence of the alleged pressure campaign against Ukraine.... Comparing Volker's testimony to other witnesses raises very serious concerns about Volker's truthfulness before Congress. To be more specific, it appears that Mr. Volker lied to Congress in violation of federal criminal law (18 USC 1001). The most serious instances include his flat denial that the Ukraine "investigations" were discussed in a July 10 meeting at the White House, his denial of his own knowledge or involvement in efforts to urge Ukraine to investigate Biden, his denial of his own knowledge or involvement in a quid pro quo scheme, and his claim that efforts to get Ukraine to make a public statement about the investigations ended in mid-to-late August." Goodman has produced a 60-page side-by-side chart comparing Volker's testimony to that of other witnesses. Emphasis original.

Washington Post Breaking: "Democrats on Monday released the transcripts of last week's depositions of [David] Holmes[, a senior political officer at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv,] and David Hale, undersecretary of state for political affairs."

Here's the transcript of David Holmes' testimony, via NPR. Mrs. McC: I'll put up analyses of his & David Hales' testimony when they becomes available. ~~~

~~~ Mary Jalonick of the AP: "The phone call State Department official David Holmes overheard between ... Donald Trump and Ambassador Gordon Sondland during a lunch in Ukraine was so distinctive -- even extraordinary -- that no one needed to refresh his memory, according to testimony released late Monday in the impeachment inquiry. 'I've never seen anything like this,' Holmes told House investigators, 'someone calling the President from a mobile phone at a restaurant, and then having a conversation of this level of candor, colorful language. There's just so much about the call that was so remarkable that I remember it vividly.'" ~~~

~~~ Kyle Cheney & Rishika Dugyala of Politico: "... Donald Trump's call to the cell phone of a U.S. ambassador -- a call that included a discussion of 'investigations' Trump was asking Ukraine to launch into his Democratic rivals -- was at risk of being monitored by Russia, [David Holmes] told House impeachmen investigators.... Holmes ... said it immediately made him nervous because two of the three mobile networks in Ukraine are Russian-owned. 'We generally assume that mobile communications in Ukraine are being monitored,' Holmes said, according to a transcript of his Nov. 15 closed-door testimony, released late Monday.... Holmes said after the exchange he reported the call to his supervisor, Kristina Kvien. The [telephone] exchange is a crucial piece of firsthand evidence of Trump's effort -- aided by a shadow diplomacy campaign led by his personal attorney Rudy Giuliani -- to pressure Ukraine to launch an investigation of former Vice President Joe Biden and other Democrats."

~~~ The transcript of David Hale's testimony is here, also via NPR. ~~~

~~~ Here's a bit from the Washington Post (at 8:30 pm ET Monday): David "Hale said that during a meeting on April 25, [also linked above] officials discussed the fact that Trump had 'lost confidence' in then-ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch and how they could remove her in a way that 'limited the controversy, and .. the damage that might do the ambassador's own reputation and to the State Department and to the embassy in Kyiv.' So, he said, the decision was made to bring her back to Washington to discuss with her 'how best to achieve that.' He said he was not aware of any evidence to support the allegations against Yovanovitch. 'No one to my knowledge believed that they had seen anything that would suggest that the ambassador had done anything wrong,' he said. In fact, he said, 'I felt she had been doing an exceptional job.'" ~~~

     ~~~ According to the Politico report by Cheney & Dugyala, linked above, David "Hale said he 'advocated strongly for resuming [military] assistance' [to Ukraine] but didn't have confidence that would happen: The OMB 'had guidance from the President and from Acting Chief of Staff Mulvaney to freeze the assistance,' he said."

Jeffery Martin of Newsweek: "In a letter dated Monday to Republican Congressmen Devin Nunes and Jim Jordan responding to their request for information regarding the Ukraine call that led to impeachment proceedings against ... Donald Trump, Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson, also a Republican, said the impeachment inquiry is 'a continuation of a concerted, and possible coordinated, effort to sabotage the Trump administration.'... Johnson cast aspersions onto the character of Lieutenant Colonel Alexander Vindman who is expected to testify in the impeachment proceedings Tuesday. In the letter, Johnson related the events of a briefing he attended with [Col. Alexander] Vindman on May 20. While Johnson believed that supporting Ukraine was 'essential' in the United States' competition with Russia, Vindman allegedly disagreed. 'He stated that it was the position of the NSC that our relationship with Ukraine should be kept separate from our geopolitical competition with Russia,' Johnson wrote.... Johnson went on to say Vindman belongs to 'a significant number of bureaucrats and staff members within the executive branch [who have] never accepted President Trump as legitimate and resent his unorthodox style and his intrusion onto their 'turf."'" ~~~

     ~~~ Zachary Basu of Axios has Johnson's full screed letter here.

Desmond Butler & Michael Biesecker of the AP: "U.S. State Department officials were informed that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy was feeling pressure from the Trump administration to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden even before the July phone call that has led to impeachment hearings in Washington, two people with knowledge of the matter told The Associated Press. In early May, officials at the U.S. Embassy in Kyiv, including then-Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch, were told Zelenskiy was seeking advice on how to navigate the difficult position he was in, the two people told the AP. He was concerned ... Donald Trump and associates were pressing him to take action that could affect the 2020 U.S. presidential race, the two individuals said.... State Department officials in Kyiv and Washington were briefed on Zelenskiy's concerns at least three times.... The briefings and the notes show that U.S. officials knew early that Zelenskiy was feeling pressure to investigate Biden, even though the Ukrainian leader later denied it in a joint news conference with Trump in September. Congressional Republicans have pointed to that public Zelenskiy statement to argue that he felt no pressure to open an investigation.... In the impeachment hearings, Democrats have countered that Zelenskiy's public comments came when he was trying to calm the waters with the U.S. president in the immediate wake of the transcript's release."

Brett Samuels of the Hill: "President Trump on Monday said he will 'strongly consider' giving written or in-person testimony in the House impeachment inquiry, despite his repeated refusal to cooperate with the investigation thus far. Trump responded to Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) suggestion on 'Face the Nation' a day earlier in which she said the president could 'come right before the committee and talk... or he could do it in writing.'" Mrs. McC: Yeah, Donnie, just as you repeatedly said you could hardly wait to testify to Bob Mueller. Yesterday, after strongly considering swimming from Kennebunkport to Brittany, France, and rejecting the idea, today I'm going to strongly consider climbing Mount Everest alongside all the other climbers. (Also linked yesterday.)

Quinta Jurecic & Benjamin Wittes in The Atlantic: "The Trump defensive playbook has a few distinctive plays. There's the allegation of a deep-state conspiracy. The demonization of an individual career official. The assertion that the relevant investigation was conceived in sin and is hopelessly tainted by it. The focus on throwing handfuls of spaghetti at the wall, rather than stitching together a coherent alternative narrative.... As the impeachment inquiry gains steam..., Donald Trump and his defenders are running their old playbook [from the Mueller probe].... It is too soon to tell whether the playbook is working.... The stability of the president's approval ratings ... suggests that, at a minimum, it is not not working -- at least not yet. The playbook may be even more implausible intellectually than it was the first time around. It may be infuriating. And it is certainly demagogic and immoral in its deceit and slander. But it has played an effective role in Trump's resilience to date. So why not try it again?" --s ~~~

~~~ Kevin Liptak & Pamela Brown of CNN: "... Donald Trump's aides have explored moving some impeachment witnesses on loan to the White House from other agencies, such as Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, back to their home departments ahead of schedule, according to people familiar with the conversations. As public hearings bring the officials' allegations to his television screen, Trump is asking anew how witnesses such as Vindman and Ambassador Bill Taylor came to work for him, people familiar with the matter said. He has suggested again they be dismissed, even as advisers warn him firing them could be viewed as retaliation. The possible move of officials out of the White House could still be viewed by some as evidence of retribution for their testimony. Trump's frustration at his own officials comes as he attacks witnesses on Twitter, including during Friday's public hearing with the ousted ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch. Trump appears to have adopted a strategy of maligning the officials, despite some allies encouraging him not to."

Sad! Carol Lee, et al., of NBC News: "The impeachment inquiry has created the first rift between ... Donald Trump and the Cabinet member who has been his closest ally, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, according to four current and former senior administration officials. Trump has fumed for weeks that Pompeo is responsible for hiring State Department officials whose congressional testimony threatens to bring down his presidency, the officials said. The president confronted Pompeo about the officials -- and what he believed was a lackluster effort by the secretary of state to block their testimony -- during lunch at the White House on Oct. 29, those familiar with the matter said.... Trump particularly blames Pompeo for tapping Ambassador Bill Taylor in June to be the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, the current and former senior administration officials said.... The impeachment inquiry has put Pompeo in what one senior administration official described as an untenable position: trying to manage a bureaucracy of 75,000 people that has soured on his leadership and also please a boss with outsized expectations of loyalty." Thanks to Patrick for the link. See also his commentary in yesterday's thread. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Kevin Drum of Mother Jones: "Trump is taking a beating from diplomats and other State Department officials who have testified that Trump did indeed try to extort Ukraine into providing dirt on Joe Biden in return for military aid. Since Trump can't admit that his problems stem from the fact that he actually did something wrong, it must be a problem with the State Department instead. Right? So now Mike Pompeo is caught in Trump's crosshairs[.]"

Jonathan Allen of NBC News: "Two days after a whistleblower secretly filed a complaint about ... Donald Trump's dealings with Ukraine in August, two top congressional staffers arrived in Kyiv on a routine business trip that ended up setting off alarm bells on Capitol Hill. The aides ... had been dispatched to make an on-the-ground assessment of the cash Congress has been pumping into former Soviet states -- including Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine -- to aid their defenses against Russian aggression. But ... the staffers were shocked to learn from U.S. embassy officials that there was no new money coming into Ukraine.... What's more, the two Appropriations staffers, Becky Leggieri and Hayden Milberg, couldn't even get an explanation for the hold-up, because embassy officials didn't know the reason.... That set off a scramble in Washington to find out what happened to the hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars that had been specifically earmarked by Congress for Ukraine.... The hunt to find out why the money wasn't moving played out on Capitol Hill and across several federal agencies at the same time the whistleblower complaint was quietly winding its way through separate government channels in August and early September, and it illustrates the difficulty anyone connected to the administration would have in hiding a plot to withhold federal funds." (Also linked yesterday.)

Rudy Giuliani, Cybersecurity Expert. David Sanger of the New York Times: "Rudolph W. Giuliani ... makes a living selling cybersecurity advice through his companies. President Trump even named him the administration's first informal 'cybersecurity adviser.' But inside the National Security Council, officials expressed wonderment that Mr. Giuliani was running his 'irregular channel' of Ukraine diplomacy over open cell lines and communications apps in Ukraine that the Russians have deeply penetrated. In his testimony to the House impeachment inquiry, Tim Morrison, who is leaving as the National Security Council's head of Europe and Russia, recalled expressing astonishment to William B. Taylor Jr., who was sitting in as the chief American diplomat in Ukraine, that the leaders of the 'irregular channel' seemed to have little concern about revealing their conversations to Moscow. 'He and I discussed a lack of, shall we say, OPSEC, that much of Rudy's discussions were happening over an unclassified cellphone or, perhaps as bad, WhatsApp messages, and therefore you can only imagine who else knew about them,' Mr. Morrison testified.... 'And I found that to be highly problematic and indicative of someone who didn't really understand how national security processes are run.'"

Rene Marsh, et al., of CNN: "Federal prosecutors in New York who are investigating Rudy Giuliani are seeking to interview people with knowledge of Ukraine's state-run oil-and-gas company, Naftogaz, according to two people familiar with the matter, suggesting investigators have opened a line of inquiry into whether Giuliani and his associates sought to secure energy deals by asserting influence on the company.... Naftogaz stands at the center of an effort by Giuliani associates Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, and their purported natural-gas company, Global Energy Producers, to replace Naftogaz's chief executive officer with someone who would be more beneficial to their own business interests earlier this year.... An American energy consultant who operates in Ukraine, Dale Perry, described [Lev & Igor's] efforts to oust Naftogaz's CEO, Andriy Kobolyev, who is known for his anti-corruption reforms at the company...." ~~~

~~~ Jonathan Chait: Friday, CNN reported that "[Lev] Parnas and [Igor] Fruman, along with their partner, Rudy Giuliani, met with Trump in the White House during its annual Hanukkah party. Parnas told two people that Trump tasked them with pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden.... Here Trump recruited a pair of sleazeballs with ties to the Russian mafia to communicate with the Ukrainian government on his behalf. 'President outsources his foreign policy to gangsters' is the sort of charge that ought to draw more attention than it has.... Parnas, Fruman, and Giuliani ... were also looking to line their own pockets in the process.... Despite the pretext of fighting Ukrainian corruption, Trump's allies were undermining reforms in Ukraine and recorrupting institutions that had been turned into instruments of the rule of law.... Lurking in the shadows of the [Ukraine] scandal is an ulterior motive: Giuliani, Parnas, and Fruman were extorting Ukraine in the traditional, moneymaking way also.... If there's any way the Ukraine scandal can get materially worse, it would be Trump directing a scheme to not only gain a political advantage but to enrich his partners, or even himself."

Charlie Savage of the New York Times: "Impeachment investigators are exploring whether President Trump lied in his written answers to Robert S. Mueller III during the Russia investigation, a lawyer for the House told a federal appeals court on Monday, raising the prospect of bringing an additional basis for a Senate trial over whether to remove Mr. Trump.... Mr. Trump wrote that he was 'not aware during the campaign of any communications' between 'any one I understood to be a representative of WikiLeaks' and people associated with his campaign, including his political adviser Roger J. Stone Jr., who was convicted at trial last week for lying to congressional investigators about his efforts to reach out to WikiLeaks and his discussions with the campaign." A CNN report is here. (Also linked yesterday.)

Jeff Stein & Tom Hamburger of the Washington Post: "Two senators are looking into a whistleblower's allegations that at least one political appointee at the Treasury Department may have tried to interfere with an audit of President Trump or Vice President Pence, according to two people with knowledge of the matter, a sign that lawmakers are moving to investigate the complaint lodged by a senior staffer at the Internal Revenue Service. Staff members for Sens. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ron Wyden (Ore.), the chairman and ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, met with the IRS whistleblower earlier this month, those people said. Follow-up interviews are expected to further explore the whistleblower's allegations.... Trump administration officials have previously played down the complaint's significance and suggested that it is politically motivated.... The IRS whistleblower complaint was first disclosed in an August court filing by Rep. Richard E. Neal (D-Mass.), the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.... Neal made the disclosure in court filings as part of his battle with the Trump administration over the president's tax returns, which the Treasury Department has refused to furnish. At the time, Neal said the whistleblower complaint raises 'serious and urgent concerns' about the integrity of the IRS audit process." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

~~~ Alan Rappeport of the New York Times: "Senate Finance Committee staff members met this month with an Internal Revenue Service whistle-blower who has alleged that senior Treasury Department officials tried to exert influence over the mandatory audit of President Trump's tax returns, a congressional aide said on Monday. The whistle-blower contacted the staff of the House Ways and Means Committee over the summer and accused political appointees in the Treasury Department of improperly involving themselves in the audit and putting pressure of some kind on senior officials in the I.R.S.... A person familiar with the complaint has said that it did not directly implicate Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin in the political meddling." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: Of course it could not be possible that (1) the whistleblower's complaint is accurate and (2) Trump directed a political appointee to mess with his audit. ~~~

~~~ Harper Neidig of the Hill: "The Supreme Court on Monday issued a temporary stay of an appeals court ruling that granted House Democrats' access to President Trump's financial records.... The subpoena from the House Oversight Committee will be unenforceable while the Supreme Court decides whether to take up the case. Developing." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ Update. Adam Liptak of the New York Times: "Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. on Monday temporarily blocked an appeals court ruling that required President Trump to turn over financial records to a House committee. The brief order gave no reasons and served to maintain the status quo while the justices decided how to proceed. In a letter to the court earlier on Monday, lawyers for the committee said they did not oppose a brief interim stay. In entering one, the chief justice ordered the committee's lawyers to file papers on whether to grant a longer stay by Thursday. If the justices grant a longer stay, they will next consider whether to hear Mr. Trump's appeal. The case, concerning a subpoena from the House Oversight and Reform Committee, is one of two cases before the Supreme Court in which Mr. Trump is seeking to halt disclosures of his financial records by his accounting firm, Mazars USA. The other case concerns a subpoena from Manhattan prosecutors to the firm seeking eight years of his personal and business tax returns." (Also linked yesterday.)

Betsy Swan & Erin Banco of the Daily Beast: "Paul Erickson, the former boyfriend of convicted Russian agent Maria Butina, has pleaded guilty to wire fraud and money laundering, according to a plea agreement filed in a South Dakota federal court Monday afternoon. In a two-page statement detailing the factual basis for the plea, Erickson said he conned someone only identified as 'D.G.' into wiring him $100,000 under the pretense that the money was for a real estate investment in North Dakota. As part of the plea filed in U.S. district court in South Dakota, Erickson admits the money was not for a real estate deal. He also notes that he wired $1,000 of the money to a person called 'M.B.'... Erickson was indicted in February on allegations that he ran a criminal scheme from 1996 to 2018 in which he was accused of using a chain of assisted living homes called Compass Care.” Erickson also ran at least two other fraudulent schemes, according to prosecutors. Mrs. McC: Sadly, "M.B.," the recipient of the $1,000 wire transfer, was not "Marie Burns," but was likely Maria Butina.

Peter Baker of the New York Times: "The White House sought on Monday night to quell a torrent of speculation about President Trump's health two days after a mysterious, unannounced visit to the hospital, denying that he was treated for an emergency and insisting that it was just 'regular, primary preventive care.... Despite some of the speculation, the president has not had any chest pain, nor was he evaluated or treated for any urgent or acute issues," Cmdr. Sean P. Conley, the president's Navy physician, wrote in a memo released by the White House in an unusual late-night statement. 'Specifically, he did not undergo any specialized cardiac or neurologic evaluations.'" ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: I haven't been paying attention, but a pundit on the teevee last night noted that since Trump's surprise visit to Walter Reed on Saturday, Trump has not appeared in public. He's scheduled to run a Cabinet meeting at 11:30 am ET today. ~~~

     ~~~ Update. Toluse Olorunnipa & Amy Gardner of the Washington Post: "Trump, 73, made an unscheduled trip to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., on Saturday, a visit that remained shrouded in secrecy for two days as Trump stayed away from the public eye and the White House dodged questions about his health.... On Monday, he remained out of public view, holding his meetings behind closed doors. He met with Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell inside the White House residence rather than the Oval Office.... The White House has adequate equipment and facilities to treat most minor illnesses and conduct routine tests."

What a Surprise! CBS News: "A CBS News investigation has uncovered a possible pay-for-play scheme involving the Republican National Committee and President Trump's nominee for ambassador to the Bahamas. Emails obtained by CBS News show the nominee, San Diego billionaire Doug Manchester, was asked by the RNC to donate half a million dollars as his confirmation in the Senate hung in the balance, chief investigative correspondent Jim Axelrod reports.... In an email..., [RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel] asked Manchester [just as his nomination was coming up for a committee vote], 'Would you consider putting together $500,000 worth of contributions from your family to ensure we hit our ambitious fundraising goal?'... He wrote back to McDaniel:... 'As you know I am not supposed to do any, but my wife is sending a contribution for $100,000. Assuming I get voted out of the [Foreign Relations Committee] on Wednesday to the floor we need you to have the majority leader bring it to a majority vote ... Once confirmed, I our [sic] family will respond!'" Manchester copied "staffers of two senators who controlled his nomination, Kentucky's Rand Paul and Idaho's Jim Risch, alerting them to his willingness to donate more after confirmation.... Risch alerted the White House, which then asked Manchester to withdraw." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: Actually, the most surprising part is that the White House asked Manchester to withdraw, which he did. However, Risch probably made clear to the Trumpies that Manchester would never be confirmed; the committee had already held up the nomination for 2-1/2 years, and this pay-for-play gambit was the nail in the coffin.


Stephanie Nebehay
of Reuters: "The United States has the world's highest rate of children in detention, including more than 100,000 in immigration-related custody that violates international law, the author of a United Nations study said on Monday.... Children should only be detained as a measure of last resort and for the shortest time possible, according to the United Nations Global Study on Children Deprived of Liberty." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

~~~ Julia Ainsley of NBC News: "The Trump administration is preparing to publish a rule that would send migrants who pass through Guatemala, El Salvador or Honduras before seeking asylum in the United States back to those dangerous Central American countries to claim asylum there instead." ~~~

~~~ Sofia Menchu & Ted Hesson of Reuters: "The U.S. government said on Saturday that it had no plans to send asylum seekers to remote regions in Guatemala after the Central American country floated the plan during negotiations for a bilateral migration agreement this week.... Incoming president Giammattei criticized the lack of transparency around how the deal is being finalised and told reporters at a press conference on Saturday that his government would evaluate any agreement that was struck by his predecessor. Guatemala's tiny refugee agency ... has around 10 officials.... Guatemala&'s Interior Minister Enrique Degenhart ... said the regions could include, but would probably not be limited to, the Peten jungle, a sweltering area in northern Guatemala that borders Mexico and is known to be frequented by drug cartels." --s ~~~

~~~ Abigail Hauslohner of the Washington Post: "Though President Trump has made cracking down on immigration a centerpiece of his first term, his administration lags far behind President Barack Obama's pace of deportations. Obama -- who immigrant advocates at one point called the 'deporter in chief' -- removed 409,849 people in 2012 alone. Trump, who has vowed to deport 'millions' of immigrants, has yet to surpass 260,000 deportations in a single year. And while Obama deported 1.18 million people during his first three years in office, Trump has deported fewer than 800,000. It is unclear why deportations have been happening relatively slowly." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

~~~ Katie Rogers & Jason LeParle of the New York Times look into Stephen Miller's "intellectual ties to the world of white nationalism.... Katie McHugh -- the former Breitbart editor who leaked the messages, some 900 emails sent from March 2015 to June 2016 -- said in an interview last week that 'it's easy to draw a clear line from the white supremacist websites where he is getting his ideas to current immigration policy.'" (Also linked yesterday.)

David Zucchino & Adam Goldman of the New York Times: "The Taliban on Tuesday freed two Westerners they had held for more than three years in exchange for the release of three senior insurgent leaders, officials said, in a deal that officials hoped could pave the way for Afghan peace talks with the Taliban.The Westerners were released to American forces by the Taliban, and included an American, Kevin C. King, 63, and an Australian, Timothy J. Weeks, 50, teachers at the American University in Kabul who were abducted in 2016." The AP report is here.

Jennifer Hansler, et al., of CNN: "US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Monday announced a major reversal of the US' longstanding policy on Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, rejecting a 1978 State Department legal opinion that deemed the settlements 'inconsistent with international law.' The announcement, which breaks with international law and consensus, is the latest in a string of hardline, pro-Israeli moves that are likely to inflame tensions between the Trump administration and Palestinians and widen the divide between the Trump administration and traditional US allies in Europe." The New York Times story is here.

Eli Lee of CREW: "[T]he Department of Justice recently issued a legal opinion that appears to exempt a Saudi-owned oil company's lobbyists from registering under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), according to a CREW analysis of lobbying disclosures and DOJ records. The lobbyists have instead been permitted to disclose their work under the less rigorous Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA). As a result, information that would have been disclosed under FARA -- including detailed lists of the lobbyists' meetings with government officials -- has effectively been withheld from the government and the public, thus hiding details of a lobbying campaign that could be considered part of Saudi Arabia's U.S. influence efforts. More broadly, the DOJ's legal opinion appears to establish a general loophole in FARA that allows corporations that are wholly owned by a foreign state-owned company to obscure the full extent of their influence efforts in the United States." --s

Dan DeLuce, et al., of NBC News: "Senior Trump administration official Mina Chang resigned from her job at the State Department two and a half hours after NBC News went to her spokesperson to ask about newly discovered false claims she had made about her charity work. NBC News had previously reported that Chang, the deputy assistant secretary in the State Department's Bureau of Conflict and Stability Operations, had embellished her resume with misleading claims about her educational achievements and the scope of her nonprofit's work -- even posting a fake cover of Time magazine with her face on it." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: We've known for years that Donald Trump has embellished his résumé & hung fake pictures of himself on the cover of Time in some of his resorts. Why doesn't he resign? (Okay, that was rhetorical. I know he has no shame.)

Your Tax Dollars Hardly Working. Elaina Plott of The Atlantic: Rudy Giuliani's son Andrew "has served in the Office of Public Liaison, beginning as an associate director, since March 2017, making him one of the longest-serving members of the Trump administration.... [H]e earns a salary of $90,700.... [S]everal of the current and former administration officials I spoke to for this story said Giuliani helps arrange sports teams' visits to the White House.... 'He doesn't really try to be involved in anything,' one former senior White House official told me, speaking on the condition of anonymity.... And as the person with one of the better golf handicaps in Trump's inner circle, Giuliani sometimes traveled with the president for the sole purpose of joining him for a round or two. Ultimately, Giuliani's face time with Trump in that first year rivaled that of far more senior officials." --s

Michael Balsamo & Tom Hays of the AP: "Two correctional officers responsible for guarding Jeffrey Epstein when he took his own life are expected to face criminal charges this week for falsifying prison records, two people familiar with the matter told The Associated Press. The federal charges could come as soon as Tuesday and are the first in connection with Epstein's death. The wealthy financier died at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York while awaiting trial on charges of sexually abusing teenage girls. The officers on Epstein's unit at the federal jail in New York City are suspected of failing to check on him every half-hour, as required, and of fabricating log entries to claim they had. Federal prosecutors offered the guards a plea bargain, but the AP reported Friday that the officers declined the deal."

In yesterday's thread, Anonymous recommended a special by NBC News' Richard Engel on Trump's withdrawal from Syria, allowing Turkey to attack Kurdish allies of the U.S. If you subscribe to MSNBC on a cable or satellite service, you can view it here after signing in. (It's possible you'll have trouble signing in. For quite awhile, my sign-in via Xfinity didn't work, but it's been working for a couple of months.) As Anonymous suggested, you also may be able to access the report onyour TV via your provider's on-demand facility; the show is called "On Assignment with Richard Engel."

Beyond the Beltway

Mississippi. Ashton Pittman of the Jackson Free Press: "Shanda Yates, a 38-year-old Jackson-area attorney, has ousted Billy Denny, a top Republican in the Mississippi House of Representatives who first won his seat in 1987 -- when Yates was just 6 years old. The Democratic political newcomer beat the longtime House District 64 incumbent by about 51% to 49%, the Hinds County Election Commission confirmed to the Jackson Free Press after finishing counting provisional ballots on Monday.... Yates won by 168 votes." ~~~

~~~ The Trump Effect. Ashton Pittman: "Donald Trump's visit to Tupelo [Mississippi] earlier this month may have boosted Mississippi Democrats more than Republicans in the northeast part of the state, Chism Strategies, one of the state's top polling and political strategy firms, says. The president's Nov. 1 visit boosted Republican voter turnout in Northeast Mississippi by 5%, but gave Democrats in the region a 12% boost, the firm's Brad Chism wrote in an 'Open Letter to Mississippi Democrats' late last week.... While ... every ... Democratic candidate statewide lost, Chism pointed out some 'silver linings' -- including Democrat Hester Jackson-McCray's defeat of an incumbent GOP Mississippi in a DeSoto County House District that Republicans won by 36 points in 2015." --s ~~~

~~~ Louisiana. safari: Another insight from the article above: "[Louisiana governor John Bel] Edwards' decision to expand Medicaid in the state, which [Republican Bobby] Jindal had blocked, proved popular in the state, after it opened health-care access to more than 470,000 Louisiana residents. A study since found that expansion 'led to a $1.85 billion direct economic impact' in the first year, helped the state save $317 million, and& created 19,000 new jobs."

Monday
Nov182019

The Commentariat -- November 18, 2019

Late Morning/Afternoon Update:

Charlie Savage of the New York Times: "Impeachment investigators are exploring whether President Trump lied in his written answers to Robert S. Mueller III during the Russia investigation, a lawyer for the House told a federal appeals court on Monday, raising the prospect of bringing an additional basis for a Senate trial over whether to remove Mr. Trump.... Mr. Trump wrote that he was 'not aware during the campaign of any communications' between 'any one I understood to be a representative of WikiLeaks' and people associated with his campaign, including his political adviser Roger J. Stone Jr., who was convicted at trial last week for lying to congressional investigators about his efforts to reach out to WikiLeaks and his discussions with the campaign." A CNN report is here.

Jeff Stein & Tom Hamburger of the Washington Post: "Two senators are looking into a whistleblower's allegations that at least one political appointee at the Treasury Department may have tried to interfere with an audit of President Trump or Vice President Pence, according to two people with knowledge of the matter, a sign that lawmakers are moving to investigate the complaint lodged by a senior staffer at the Internal Revenue Service. Staff members for Sens. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ron Wyden (Ore.), the chairman and ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, met with the IRS whistleblower earlier this month, those people said. Follow-up interviews are expected to further explore the whistleblower's allegations.... Trump administration officials have previously played down the complaint's significance and suggested that it is politically motivated.... The IRS whistleblower complaint was first disclosed in an August court filing by Rep. Richard E. Neal (D-Mass.), the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.... Neal made the disclosure in court filings as part of his battle with the Trump administration over the president's tax returns, which the Treasury Department has refused to furnish. At the time, Neal said the whistleblower complaint raises 'serious and urgent concerns' about the integrity of the IRS audit process." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: Of course it could not be possible that (1) the whistleblower's complaint is accurate and (2) Trump directed a political appointee to mess with his audit. ~~~

~~~ Harper Neidig of the Hill: "The Supreme Court on Monday issued a temporary stay of an appeals court ruling that granted House Democrats' access to President Trump's financial records.... The subpoena from the House Oversight Committee will be unenforceable while the Supreme Court decides whether to take up the case. Developing." ~~~

     ~~~ Update. Adam Liptak of the New York Times: "Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. on Monday temporarily blocked an appeals court ruling that required President Trump to turn over financial records to a House committee. The brief order gave no reasons and served to maintain the status quo while the justices decided how to proceed. In a letter to the court earlier on Monday, lawyers for the committee said they did not oppose a brief interim stay. In entering one, the chief justice ordered the committee's lawyers to file papers on whether to grant a longer stay by Thursday. If the justices grant a longer stay, they will next consider whether to hear Mr. Trump's appeal. The case, concerning a subpoena from the House Oversight and Reform Committee, is one of two cases before the Supreme Court in which Mr. Trump is seeking to halt disclosures of his financial records by his accounting firm, Mazars USA. The other case concerns a subpoena from Manhattan prosecutors to the firm seeking eight years of his personal and business tax returns."

Stephanie Nebehay of Reuters: "The United States has the world's highest rate of children in detention, including more than 100,000 in immigration-related custody that violates international law, the author of a United Nations study said on Monday.... Children should only be detained as a measure of last resort and for the shortest time possible, according to the United Nations Global Study on Children Deprived of Liberty." ~~~

~~~ Abigail Hauslohner of the Washington Post: "Though President Trump has made cracking down on immigration a centerpiece of his first term, his administration lags far behind President Barack Obama's pace of deportations. Obama -- who immigrant advocates at one point called the 'deporter in chief' -- removed 409,849 people in 2012 alone. Trump, who has vowed to deport 'millions' of immigrants, has yet to surpass 260,000 deportations in a single year. And while Obama deported 1.18 million people during his first three years in office, Trump has deported fewer than 800,000. It is unclear why deportations have been happening relatively slowly." ~~~

~~~ Katie Rogers & Jason LeParle of the New York Times look into Stephen Miller's "intellectual ties to the world of white nationalism.... Katie McHugh -- the former Breitbart editor who leaked the messages, some 900 emails sent from March 2015 to June 2016 -- said in an interview last week that 'it's easy to draw a clear line from the white supremacist websites where he is getting his ideas to current immigration policy.'"

More below the graphic.

If Sondland shows up Wednesday & testifies truthfully, what are the odds that Trump will tweet-fire him mid-hearing?

Brett Samuels of the Hill: "President Trump on Monday said he will 'strongly consider' giving written or in-person testimony in the House impeachment inquiry, despite his repeated refusal to cooperate with the investigation thus far. Trump responded to Speaker Nancy Pelosi's (D-Calif.) suggestion on 'Face the Nation' a day earlier in which she said the president could 'come right before the committee and talk... or he could do it in writing.'" Mrs. McC: Yeah, Donnie, just as you repeatedly said you could hardly wait to testify to Bob Mueller. I'm going to spend the day strongly considering swimming from Kennebunkport to Brittany, France.

Sad! Carol Lee, et al., of NBC News: "The impeachment inquiry has created the first rift between ... Donald Trump and the Cabinet member who has been his closest ally, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, according to four current and former senior administration officials. Trump has fumed for weeks that Pompeo is responsible for hiring State Department officials whose congressional testimony threatens to bring down his presidency, the officials said. The president confronted Pompeo about the officials -- and what he believed was a lackluster effort by the secretary of state to block their testimony -- during lunch at the White House on Oct. 29, those familiar with the matter said.... Trump particularly blames Pompeo for tapping Ambassador Bill Taylor in June to be the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, the current and former senior administration officials said.... The impeachment inquiry has put Pompeo in what one senior administration official described as an untenable position: trying to manage a bureaucracy of 75,000 people that has soured on his leadership and also please a boss with outsized expectations of loyalty." Thanks to Patrick for the link. See his commentary in today's thread.

Jonathan Allen of NBC News: "Two days after a whistleblower secretly filed a complaint about ... Donald Trump's dealings with Ukraine in August, two top congressional staffers arrived in Kyiv on a routine business trip that ended up setting off alarm bells on Capitol Hill. The aides ... had been dispatched to make an on-the-ground assessment of the cash Congress has been pumping into former Soviet states -- including Moldova, Georgia and Ukraine -- to aid their defenses against Russian aggression. But ... the staffers were shocked to learn from U.S. embassy officials that there was no new money coming into Ukraine.... What's more, the two Appropriations staffers, Becky Leggieri and Hayden Milberg, couldn't even get an explanation for the hold-up, because embassy officials didn't know the reason.... That set off a scramble in Washington to find out what happened to the hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars that had been specifically earmarked by Congress for Ukraine.... The hunt to find out why the money wasn't moving played out on Capitol Hill and across several federal agencies at the same time the whistleblower complaint was quietly winding its way through separate government channels in August and early September, and it illustrates the difficulty anyone connected to the administration would have in hiding a plot to withhold federal funds."

~~~~~~~~~~

This Is the Week That Is. Sam Brodey of the Daily Beast: "The upcoming week on Capitol Hill will be defining for the impeachment inquiry. Eight witnesses will testify publicly over three days in what will be the second, and perhaps final, week of public impeachment hearings." Set to testify this week are Gordon Sondland, Alexander Vindman, Kurt Volker, Jennifer Williams, Fiona Hill, Laura Cooper & David Hale. ~~~

~~~ Deirdre Walsh of NPR reports the schedule of witness testimony, which begins Tuesday at 9 am ET with Col. Alexander Vindman & ends Thursday with testimony from Fiona Hill, scheduled to begin at 9 am ET.

Emma Newburger of CNBC: "... Donald Trump on Sunday attacked Jennifer Williams, a special advisor to Vice President Mike Pence, a day after the House Intelligence Committee released testimony in which she called the July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky 'unusual and inappropriate.' 'Tell Jennifer Williams, whoever that is, to read BOTH transcripts of the presidential calls, & see the just released statement from Ukraine,' the president wrote on Twitter. 'Then she should meet with the other Never Trumpers, who I don't know & mostly never even heard of, & work out a better presidential attack!' A spokesperson for the vice president's office, responding to a request for comment on Trump's remarks, simply said 'Jennifer is a State Department employee.' While Williams is a State Department employee, she has been detailed to Pence's national security council staff to work on issues related to Europe and Russia." ~~~

~~~ Chandelis Duster, et al., of CNN point out that Jennifer Williams is scheduled to testify in public this week, and they note that "Trump resurfaced an unfounded accusation he has raised against other officials who have testified in the probe, characterizing Williams as a Never Trumper and associating her with other 'Never Trumpers.'" As for veep wimpy, "Pence's office on Sunday declined to defend Williams after Trump's Twitter attack.... Staffers in the vice president's office have made a concerted effort to distance Pence from Williams, even before she sat down to testify. But sources explained to CNN that his office is selective about which career officials get detailed to their staff. His senior staff typically interviews them beforehand. Keith Kellogg, the vice president's national security adviser, was responsible for selecting Williams." Mrs. McC: Taken together, this is attempted witness intimidation.

Mimi Rocah & Jennifer Rodgers in a USA Today op-ed: Former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch was testifying before a House panel that "she later learned the reason for her recall was a smear campaign orchestrated by Rudy Giuliani and others because she was standing in the way of their corrupt agenda in Ukraine. As she spoke..., Donald Trump was on Twitter doing exactly the same thing to Yovanovitch that his cohorts had done: attempting to smear and intimidate her.... This was not his first foray into public witness tampering. It is, in fact, one of his go-to moves[.]... The right to express one's opinion does not extend to criminal speech, such as verbal efforts to intimidate or tamper with witnesses. And the language, the pattern, the timing, and the contrast with tweets about other potential witnesses whom Trump considers loyal makes clear what he intends by these smear attacks.... The real issue for these impeachment proceedings is whether Trump appears to be using his platform and the power of the presidency to intimidate and harass witnesses who are providing highly damaging testimony against him. The answer to that is clearly yes." (Also linked yesterday afternoon.)

Oh, For Those Quiet Rooms of Yore. Allan Smith of NBC News: "Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., said Sunday that the administration officials who provided the whistleblower with information on ... Donald Trump's conduct toward Ukraine 'exposed things that didn't need to be exposed.... This would have been far better off if we would have just taken care of this behind the scenes,' he said.... 'If the whistleblower's goal is to improve our relationship with Ukraine, he utterly -- or she -- utterly failed,' Johnson said...." Emphasis added. Mrs. McC: So here's a U.S. senator going on national teevee & advocating for cover-ups of presidential crime sprees. In fairness, Johnson is the stupidest senator. (Also linked yesterday afternoon.) ~~~

~~~ Mike Allen of Axios: "House Republicans are asking Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) for 'firsthand information' about Ukraine-related meetings, briefings and conversations with President Trump and EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland.... A letter from Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, who's leading the GOP case, and Rep. Devin Nunes of California, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, asked Johnson for his recollections after attending the inauguration of Ukraine's president in May. The senator said yesterday on 'Meet the Press' that he had received the letter, and said he'd be working over the weekend on preparing his 'telling of events.' 'I will lay out what I know,' Johnson said. 'They're not going to call me, because certainly Adam Schiff wouldn't want to be called by the Senate. There's going to be a separation there.'" ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: Johnson has already "laid out what he knows" a few times (here, for instance), and it's been, inadvertently, pretty devastating to Trump. But apparently Jordan & Nunes are themselves dumb enough not to realize that the Supidest Man in the Senate could put his foot in it again.

The "But His Gun Jammed"; Defense. Sheryl Stolberg of the New York Times: "House Republicans ... asserted on Sunday that President Trump had done nothing wrong because his plans for Ukraine to investigate his political rivals never came to fruition -- even as the president complicated their efforts by attacking another witness.... -- Speaker Nancy Pelosi invited Mr. Trump to testify before the House Intelligence Committee, while the president's allies shifted their emphasis away from the defense they offered last week, when they stressed that witnesses had only secondhand information against him. That argument may not work much longer, because lawmakers are about to hear from crucial witnesses who had direct contact with the president including Gordon D. Sondland.... 'The Ukrainians did nothing to -- as far as investigations goes -- to get the aid released,' Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio, one of Mr. Trump's chief defenders, said on CBS's 'Face the Nation.' 'So there was never this quid pro quo that the Democrats all promise existed.'"

     ... Mrs. McCrabbie: This is equivalent to witnesses testifying that Trump aimed a gun at a person walking down Fifth Avenue, cocked & pulled the trigger, but the gun jammed. There is a sort of "logical" argument here: the penalty for attempted murder usually isn't as great as the penalty for murder. So Trump -- because his plot failed -- should not get the equivalent of the death penalty: removal from office. A serious flaw in that argument: Trump's intended result was to smear Joe Biden. And now nearly every adult in the U.S. knows that Biden's son took a high-paying position at a dodgy Ukrainian gas company just as Joe Biden made certain Ukraine's top prosecutor was fired. So, yeah, Trump shot the guy. On Fifth Avenue. In front of a huge crowd. And he kept on shooting.

Chris Wallace Did Not Drink the Kool-Aid. Justin Baragona of the Daily Beast: "Fox News Sunday anchor Chris Wallace repeatedly confronted House Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) on Sunday over the top Republican's characterization of last week's impeachment testimony, accusing the congressman of 'very badly' misrepresenting the witnesses' positions.... Scalise ... asserted [that] ... senior State Department official George Kent, top Ukraine envoy Bill Taylor, and former U.S. Amb. to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch essentially said Trump did nothing wrong. 'All three of them were asked, did you see any impeachable offenses' he declared. 'Did you see any bribery? Any of that? Not one of those things were mentioned. Not one person said they saw a crime committed.' 'With all due respect -- with all due respect, that very badly mischaracterizes what they said,' Wallace pushed back. '... William Taylor, for instance, the acting ambassador to Ukraine, was asked whether or not these were impeachable offenses. He said I'm there as a fact witness. I'm not there to pass judgment, but he made it clear what he thought about what the president was doing.' Wallace would then go on to play a clip of Taylor's testimony, further noting that Taylor said that withholding aid to Ukraine to help Trump's presidential campaign was 'crazy.' This wasn't the only time that Wallace left Scalise stumbling...." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: So apparently a new line of "defense" is that fact witnesses have properly left it to Congress to determine what constitutes impeachable offenses. (Of course, had the witnesses called for Trump's impeachment, Republicans would have screamed about their deep-state, anti-Trump bias.) When your best defense is a word-twisting game, you got nuthin'.

BUT One Republican Was Not Amused. Devan Cole of CNN: Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio) "said Sunday [on CNN's 'State of the Nation'] that information provided about Trump during a closed-door deposition of a former National Security Council official [Tim Morrison] 'is alarming' and 'not OK.'" Turner said Trump's tweet dissing Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch was not impeachable, but it was "unfortunate." "'I think along with most people, I find the President's tweets, generally, unfortunate,' Turner said."

** Gordon Sondland Is Really Forgetful. Erin Banco & Lachlan Markey of the Daily Beast: Gordon "Sondland has previously tried to claim he didn't know much about a quid pro quo with Ukraine -- until he suddenly told Congress he now recalls the deal. But the details of Sondland's behavior [at a White House meeting with Ukrainian officials on July 10] underscore the intensity in which the EU Ambassador advocated for the investigations into Biden and Burisma." When Sondland stepped into a meeting John Bolton was holding with the Ukraines, "'That's when things really went off the rails,' one person in the room said.... Bolton immediately cut the get-together short.... But Sondland guided the Ukrainians into the White House's Ward Room.... Sondland continued to not just relay, but demanded ferociously, that the Ukrainians open the Biden investigations, saying it was the only chance for Washington and Kyiv to develop any further meaningful relationship, two individuals with knowledge of Sondland's overtures said. Sondland raised his voice several times.... One individual ... [said] ... 'there was lots of yelling.' Another individual called the meeting 'erratic.'..." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: Both Fiona Hill & Tim Morrison have testified that Sondland told them he was acting at Trump's direction. And he knocked himself out, during a number of meetings & likely in texts & phone conversations & other meetings not yet revealed, to get the Ukrainians to cooperate with Trump's demand that President Zelensky announce an "investigation" into the Bidens. Yet this all, uh, slipped his mind during his initial deposition. His testimony this Wednesday, unless he just begins & ends it quickly by invoking his Fifth Amendment rights, should be very interesting. I'm sure we could all help him write his confession, the one where he breaks down in the witness chair, attests to his own corruption, fingers Trump as a lawless mob boss who should be removed from office forthwith, & throws Rudy & sundry co-conspirators under the bus. When Gym Jordan asks a question aimed at defending Trump, Sondland says, "Mr. Jordan, Trump is as bad as you were when you let that doctor get away with molesting boys you were supposed to protect." Alas, none of that will happen. And now this: ~~~

~~~ Uh-Oh. Rebecca Falconer of Axios: "Gordon Sondland ... briefed senior administration officials on efforts to get Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden ahead of President Trump's July 25 call with the Ukrainian leader, the Wall Street Journal reports.... Emails allegedly sent by Sondland that were obtained by the WSJ indicate that several other officials can confirm what some witnesses have testified to already about a Trump administration request to investigate Burisma, a gas company with ties to Biden's son. Sondland ... previously testified that he told a top Ukraine official that military aid to the country wouldn't be released until officials agreed to investigate Burisma.... Per the WSJ, Sondland kept officials including acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and Energy Secretary Rick Perry informed via email of developments in the push to get Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to announce an investigation into the Bidens." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: Oh, Rick. What about that time way last month when you said, "Not once, as God is my witness, not once was a Biden name -- not the former vice president, not his son -- ever mentioned"? And you said that on the Christian Broadcasting Network, for Pete's sake. Isn't lying under oath, as Gordy did, just like taking the Lord's name in vain on CBN? If God doesn't strike you dead, are you going to whip off your glasses and pretend you were too dumb to realize when you read Gordy's e-mails that B-I-D-E-N spells "Biden"? Or maybe you thought it was Gordy who couldn't spell, and that "Biden" meant "by then."

Kendall Karson of ABC News: "An overwhelming 70% of Americans think ... Donald Trump's request to a foreign leader to investigate his political rival, which sits a the heart of the House of Representatives' impeachment inquiry, was wrong, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds. A slim majority of Americans, 51%, believe Trump's actions were both wrong and he should be impeached and removed from office. But only 21% of Americans say they are following the hearings very closely."

Jonathan Chait: "The saga of President Trump's reprisals against Amazon has lurked on th margin of the news, largely overshadowed by the Ukraine scandal. Late Thursday night, Amazon revealed it had filed a protest in federal court of a Pentagon decision to deny it a $10 billion cloud-computing contract.... The story here is almost certainly a massive scandal, probably more significant than the Ukraine scandal that spurred impeachment proceedings. Trump improperly used government policy to punish the owner of an independent newspaper as retribution for critical coverage. It resembles the Ukraine scandal because it is a flagrant abuse of power, and has been hiding in plain sight for months (as the Ukraine scandal did, until a whistle-blower report leaked in September). The scale of the abuse, though, is far more serious, because it is a concrete manifestation of Trump's authoritarian ambitions.... By 2016 Trump had gone from implicitly threatening to harm Amazon's interests to threatening this explicitly.... As president, Trump has continued denouncing the Post and its owner, and publicly floating policies to exact his revenge." The GOP "defense" of Trump in the Ukraine scandal is that he failed to get the result he wanted, but in the Amazon case, "Trump set out to abuse his powers of office to intimidate the media, and succeeded." ~~~

~~~ MEANWHILE, Alex Pareene, in the New Republic, mourns the "death of the rude press." Mrs. McC: Pareene himself is rude, and has been rude as long as I've been reading his stuff, almost always in a good way.

Max Boot, in the Washington Post: "Enter Attorney General William P. Barr to put a pseudo-intellectual gloss on Trump's authoritarian [view that he has an 'absolute right' to do anything he wants]. In a Friday night speech to the Federalist Society, Barr gave a chilling defense of virtually unlimited executive authority.... To hear Barr tell it, Trump is somehow denied power by the nefarious 'Resistance.' Barr decried Trump critics who do not view 'themselves as the 'loyal opposition,"' but rather 'see themselves as engaged in a war to cripple, by any means necessary, a duly elected government.' Earth to Barr: Trump does not treat his critics as 'the loyal opposition.' He calls them 'human scum,' 'traitors' and 'the enemy of the people,' using the language of dictators. And it is Trump and his toadies -- not his opponents -- who are 'willing to use any means necessary to gain momentary advantage.'... The real threat to 'our Constitutional structure' emanates not from administration critics who struggle to uphold the rule of law but from a lawless president who is aided and abetted in his reckless actions by unscrupulous and unprincipled partisans -- including the attorney general of the United States."


Never Mind. Josh Dawsey & Laura McGinley
of the Washington Post: "Everything seemed ready to go: President Trump's ban on most flavored e-cigarettes had been cleared by federal regulators. Officials were poised to announce they would order candy, fruit and mint flavors off the market within 30 days -- a step the president had promised almost two months earlier to quell a youth vaping epidemic that had ensnared 5 million teenagers. One last thing was needed: Trump's sign-off. But on Nov. 4, the night before a planned morning news conference, the president balked. Briefed on a flight to a Lexington, Ky., campaign rally, he refused to sign the one-page 'decision memo,' saying he didn't want to move forward with a ban he had once backed, primarily at his wife's and daughter's urging, because he feared it would lead to job losses, said a Trump adviser who spoke on the condition of anonymity.... As he had done so many times before, Trump reversed course -- this time on a plan to address a major public health problem because of worries that apoplectic vape shop owners and their customers might hurt his reelection prospects, said White House and campaign officials."

Matt Stieb of New York: "On Saturday afternoon, Trump's tendency to downplay his personal health reached the most concerning moment of his presidency, when he went to Walter Reed Military Hospital in Bethesda, Maryland, for a surprise medical exam.... According to CNN, hospital staff were not aware that Trump was swinging through: 'Typically, Walter Reed's medical staff would get a general notice about a "VIP" visit to the medical center ahead of a presidential visit, notifying them of certain closures at the facility. That did not happen this time, indicating the visit was a non-routine visit and scheduled last minute.'... Former Secret Service agent Jonathan Wackrow ... [tweeted], 'This does not add up; the White House Medical Unit has very comprehensive facilities at the White House complex that could easily accommodate most of what is needed in an annual physical....'... If the president's Sunday behavior was any indication, all is well: Trump spent the day online, tweeting over 40 times about 'sleepy' and 'very slow' Joe Biden, 'corrupt' Adam Schiff, and the 'nasty & obnoxious Chris Wallace.'" ~~~

~~~ Karen Tumulty of the Washington Post calls for a second opinion: "The only thing of which we can be fairly certain about President Trump's mysterious Saturday-afternoon trip to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center is this: The White House is not telling the truth when it claims the president was there 'to begin portions of his routine annual physical exam.' We know this because -- well, because those people lie about pretty much everything.... Medical privacy is something that should not be granted the most powerful person in the world.... As Trump embarks on his effort to convince us that he deserves another four years in office, Americans should demand something more than what they are getting, starting with a briefing from the physicians who treated him at Walter Reed." ~~~

~~~ Do Not Question Our Lies. Bob Brigham of the Raw Story: "Press secretary Stephanie Grisham on Saturday argued it was 'dangerous for the country' for anyone to challenge the veracity of her claims. Grisham made her argument after ... Donald Trump went to Walter Reed Hospital for an unannounced doctor's visit, resulting in a great deal of speculation.... 'Further speculation beyond the extensive & honest info I put out is wholly irresponsible & dangerous for the country,' Grisham argued." Brigham reports some of the speculative tweets from a bunch of horrible, suspicious traitors.

Presidential Race

Maybe Bloomberg Really Is Running. Shane Goldmacher of the New York Times: "Ahead of a potential Democratic presidential run, former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York reversed his longstanding support of the aggressive 'stop-and-frisk' policing strategy that he pursued for a decade and that led to the disproportionate stopping of black and Latino people across the city. 'I was wrong,' Mr. Bloomberg declared. 'And I am sorry.' The speech was Mr. Bloomberg's first since he re-emerged as a possible presidential candidate. The topic and the location, the Christian Cultural Center, a black megachurch in Brooklyn, was a nod to the fact that African-American voters are a crucial Democratic constituency and that Mr. Bloomberg's policing record is seen as one of his biggest vulnerabilities, should he decide to run. Until Sunday, Mr. Bloomberg had steadfastly ... defended stop-and-frisk, which gave New York police officers sweeping authority to stop and search anyone they suspected of a crime. Mr. Bloomberg stood behind the program even after a federal judge ruled in 2013 that it violated the constitutional rights of minorities and despite the fact that crime continued to drop even after the program was phased out in recent years." Politico has the story here. (Also linked yesterday afternoon.) ~~~

~~~ Charles Blow of the New York Times is underwhelmed: "It feels like the very definition of pandering. It is impossible for me to take seriously Bloomberg's claim that he didn't understand the impact that stop-and-frisk was having on the black and brown communities when he was in office.... Bloomberg's cynicism here is staggering. But, this is something that black voters must contend with: politicians who do harm through policy to black communities, then come forward with admissions and contrition when they need black people's votes.... As he was about to enter the race..., Joe Biden finally offered a full apology for the disastrous 1994 crime bill that wreaked havoc on the black community, after having defended the bill for years." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: Politicians like Biden & Bloomberg have histories of promoting or supporting policies that are known to hurt minorities & women, then -- sometimes decades later -- "apologizing," while saying their motives back then were pure. We all make well-intentioned mistakes, so it's reasonable to believe once or twice that politicians with long records didn't understand the consequences of their actions in real time, but it gets as old as they are when the excuses keep coming and the effects of their mistakes have been in evidence for a long time.

Way Beyond the Beltway

Hong Kong. Lily Kuo of the Guardian: "Hong Kong police have fought running battles with protesters trying to break through a security cordon around a university in the city, firing teargas at anyone trying to leave. Polytechnic University, a sprawling campus that has been occupied by demonstrators since last week, has become the scene of the most prolonged and tense confrontation between police and protesters in more than five months of political unrest. Hundreds were still trapped inside on Monday, after overnight clashes during which protesters launched petrol bombs and shot arrows at police, who threatened to use live rounds."

U.K. Mark Landler of the New York Times: "... when Prince Andrew set out to explain his friendship with the financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in a BBC interview broadcast Saturday night, it backfired predictably. Viewers were left shaking their heads at the wisdom of consenting to a polite-but-relentless grilling by the journalist Emily Maitlis in the first place. Many said they found his statements alternately defensive, unpersuasive or just plain strange. Prince Andrew, also known as the Duke of York, repeatedly denied accusations by Virginia Roberts Giuffre that he had sex with her when she was 17 years old and had been offered to him by Mr. Epstein. Under insistent questioning by Ms. Maitlis, the duke insisted he had 'no recollection' of meeting Ms. Giuffre." He called Epstein's pedophelia "unbecoming." "The reaction in the British media and on social media was uniformly withering."

News Ledes

CNN: "A group of family and friends were gathered in a backyard Sunday to watch a football game when a gunman walked up and began shooting, killing four young men and wounding six others, police in Fresno, California, said. About 35 to 40 people were at the house, including several children, when the suspect -- who remains on the loose -- began shooting into the crowd, according to police."

Breaking Bad. Guardian: "Two chemistry professors in Arkansas are accused of making methamphetamine in a lab at their school. According to a statement from Clark County sheriff Jason Watson, Terry David Bateman and Bradley Allen Rowland, of Henderson State University, were arrested and charged with manufacturing meth and use of drug paraphernalia."

Saturday
Nov162019

The Commentariat -- November 17, 2019

Afternoon Update:

Oh, For Those Quiet Rooms of Yore. Allan Smith of NBC News: "Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., said Sunday that the administration officials who provided the whistleblower with information on ... Donald Trump's conduct toward Ukraine 'exposed things that didn't need to be exposed.... This would have been far better off if we would have just taken care of this behind the scenes,' he said.... 'If the whistleblower's goal is to improve our relationship with Ukraine, he utterly -- or she -- utterly failed,' Johnson said...." Emphasis added. Mrs. McC: So here's a U.S. senator going on national teevee & advocating for cover-ups of presidential crime sprees. In fairness, Johnson is the stupidest senator.

Mimi Rocah & Jennifer Rodgers in a USA Today op-ed: Former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch was testifying before a House panel that "she later learned the reason for her recall was a smear campaign orchestrated by Rudy Giuliani and others because she was standing in the way of their corrupt agenda in Ukraine. As she spoke..., Donald Trump was on Twitter doing exactly the same thing to Yovanovitch that his cohorts had done: attempting to smear and intimidate her.... This was not his first foray into public witness tampering. It is, in fact, one of his go-to moves[.]... The right to express one's opinion does not extend to criminal speech, such as verbal efforts to intimidate or tamper with witnesses. And the language, the pattern, the timing, and the contrast with tweets about other potential witnesses whom Trump considers loyal makes clear what he intends by these smear attacks.... The real issue for these impeachment proceedings is whether Trump appears to be using his platform and the power of the presidency to intimidate and harass witnesses who are providing highly damaging testimony against him. The answer to that is clearly yes."

Maybe Bloomberg Really Is Running for Prez. Shane Goldmacher of the New York Times: 'Ahead of a potential Democratic presidential run, former Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York reversed his longstanding support of the aggressive 'stop-and-frisk' policing strategy that he pursued for a decade and that led to the disproportionate stopping of black and Latino people across the city. 'I was wrong,' Mr. Bloomberg declared. 'And I am sorry.' The speech was Mr. Bloomberg's first since he re-emerged as a possible presidential candidate. The topic and the location, the Christian Cultural Center, a black megachurch in Brooklyn, was a nod to the fact that African-American voters are a crucial Democratic constituency and that Mr. Bloomberg's policing record is seen as one of his biggest vulnerabilities, should he decide to run. Until Sunday, Mr. Bloomberg had steadfastly ... defended stop-and-frisk, which gave New York police officers sweeping authority to stop and search anyone they suspected of a crime. Mr. Bloomberg stood behind the program even after a federal judge ruled in 2013 that it violated the constitutional rights of minorities and despite the fact that crime continued to drop even after the program was phased out in recent years." Politico has the story here.

~~~~~~~~~~

David Smith of the Guardian: "Donald Trump's fate in the impeachment inquiry could rest in the hands of a donor and supporter under pressure to turn against the US president to save his own skin. Gordon Sondland, the American ambassador to the European Union, is due to testify on Wednesday during the second week of televised hearings that have rocked the White House.... The ambassador made no mention of the [July 26 restaurant] call [to Trump] in a deposition to the inquiry behind closed doors, nor in a revised statement three weeks later that conceded a quid pro quo over military aid. Now, in front of TV cameras and an audience of millions, he will be asked why.... 'Hey Ambassador Sondland,' tweeted Joe Scarborough, a former [Mrs. McC: Republican] congressman turned TV host, 'Roger Stone lied to Congress for Trump and is now going to jail. Just like his campaign manager and lawyer. Are you next? Your call, Gordy.'" ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: I don't think Congress can shop for prosecutors. Thus, it seems any criminal referral coming out of the hearings would go to main Justice in D.C., where it would land in a circular file or at best garner a finding of "innocent by reason of loyalty to Trump."

Kyle Cheney & Blake Hounshell of Politico: "Tim Morrison, a top White House national security aide, told impeachment investigators that Gordon Sondland -- a U.S. ambassador at the center of the Ukraine scandal imperiling Donald Trump's presidency -- claimed to be acting on Trump's orders, and in fact was regularly in touch with him. Though other impeachment witnesses have suggested Sondland has overstated his relationship with the president, Morrison said he was repeatedly able to confirm that the envoy did speak directly with Trump. 'Every time you went to check to see whether he had, in fact, talked to the president, you found that he had talked to the president?' one lawmaker wondered, according to a transcript of Morrison's testimony released Saturday. 'Yes,' Morrison replied. Sondland's direct access to Trump is a crucial aspect of the House's impeachment inquiry.... Morrison also testified that Sondland had briefed President Trump before the fateful July 25 call, in what amounted to a circumvention of the usual National Security Council procedures." The Washington Post report is here. Mrs. McC: So now we know that Sondland spoke to Trump right before and the day after (the Kiev restaurant call) the July 25 call. ~~~

~~~ Nicholas Fandos & Sheryl Stolberg of the New York Times: "John R. Bolton, President Trump' national security adviser, met privately with the president in August as part of a bid to persuade Mr. Trump to release $391 million in security assistance to Ukraine, a senior National Security Council aide told House impeachment investigators last month. The meeting, which has not been previously reported, came as Mr. Bolton sought to marshal Mr. Trump's cabinet secretaries and top national security advisers to convince the president that it was in the United States' best interest to unfreeze the funds to help Ukraine defend itself against Russia. But Mr. Bolton emerged with Mr. Trump unmoved, and instructed the aide to look for new opportunities to get those officials in front of Mr. Trump. 'The extent of my recollection is that Ambassador Bolton simply said he wasn't ready to do it,' said the aide, Timothy Morrison, referring to Mr. Trump, according to a transcript of his testimony released by House Democrats on Saturday." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: Man up, John Bolton. Now is the time you must decide if you're a wimpy Trumpette or an American. It's a binary choice.

Andrew Desiderio & Melanie Zanona of Politico: "A top national security aide to Vice President Mike Pence told House impeachment investigators that ... Donald Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate his political opponents were 'unusual and inappropriate,' and 'shed some light on possible other motivations' for the president's order to freeze military aid to the U.S. ally. Jennifer Williams, who serves as Pence's special adviser for Europe and Russia, told investigators in early November that she took notes while she listened in on Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky from the White House Situation Room, adding that she viewed Trump's requests for investigations as politically motivated. 'I found the specific references to be -- to be more specific to the president in nature, to his personal political agenda, as opposed to a broader ... foreign policy objective of the United States,' Williams said, according to a transcript of her closed-door deposition released Saturday. Williams also told investigators that she put a hard copy of the call transcript in Pence's briefing book, but did not know whether he had read it.... Williams first-hand account details a White House and a U.S. national security apparatus deeply troubled about what appeared to be an inexplicable reversal of the Trump administration's posture toward Ukraine, a U.S. strategic ally subject to Moscow's malign influence in the region.... ~~~

     ~~~ "... Williams testified she was told that Trump asked Pence not to attend Zelensky's inauguration in May -- a month after initially asking the vice president to travel to Kyiv for the event. She added that she was never given an explanation for the reversal." As Fandos & Stolberg of the NYT reports, (linked above) "She said an assistant to the vice president's chief of staff, Marc Short, told her that Mr. Trump had asked Mr. Pence to stay home. That fact was included in an anonymous whistle-blower complaint about the Ukraine matter that helped prompt the impeachment inquiry"

Karoun Demirjian, et al., of the Washington Post: "A longtime budget official testified Saturday that the White House decision to freeze military aid to Ukraine in mid-July was highly irregular and that senior political appointees in the Office of Management and Budget were unable to provide an explanation for the delay. The testimony from Mark Sandy, the first employee of OMB to testify in the House impeachment probe, appeared to confirm Democrats' assertion that the decision to withhold nearly $400 million in congressionally approved funds for Ukraine ... was a political one. Sandy, the deputy associate director for national security programs at OMB, testified that he was instructed to sign the first of several apportionment letters in which budget officials formally instituted the freeze on funds.... Other witnesses have testified that the letter Sandy signed was dated July 25 -- the same day that President Trump spoke by phone with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and one week after OMB verbally informed interagency officials that they were withholding the funds on orders from the White House. The signature of Sandy's boss, political appointee Michael Duffey, appears on subsequent letters.... [Sandy's testimony] undermines acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney's public assertion that the Ukraine aid was frozen in a routine manner that happened 'all the time.'" The reporters outline the weird, fake excuse Duffey gave Sandy for holding up the funds to Ukraine.

Paul Sonne & Josh Dawsey of the Washington Post: "Waiters were coming and going as U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland spoke on the phone with President Trump on July 26 from the outdoor section of a central Kyiv restaurant and discussed the Ukrainian president's willingness to conduct politically charged investigations, an episode that also highlighted the lack of security around a presidential call, according to [U.S. embassy staffer David Holmes'] testimony to Congress and a person familiar with the episode. Sondland arrived in Kyiv and scrapped a schedule the embassy had arranged for him..., instead saying he wanted to meet only with Volodymr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, and the two aides closest to him: head of the presidential administration Andriy Bohdan and adviser Andriy Yermak, according to the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the sensitive nature of the subject. Sondland's interactions in Kyiv -- the day after Trump called Zelensky and exhorted him to investigate former vice president Joe Biden -- will be scrutinized in public testimony Sondland is scheduled to give this week at the impeachment inquiry.... Two other people were sitting at the table at the time and would potentially be able to corroborate Holmes's account: Suriya Jayanti, an embassy staffer..., and Tara Maher, Sondland's personal assistant, according to people with knowledge of the lunch." The story goes on to describe Sondland's extensive interactions with Yermak, tho the gist of their conversations remains secret. ~~~

     ~~~ The Useful Idiot. Mrs. McCrabbie: What's clear now is that Trump recalled Marie Yovanovitch & replaced her with Sondland specifically to carry out the scheme to pressure the Ukrainians into doing political favors for Trump. That was Sondland's Ukraine portfolio (and was outside his real job as ambassador to the E.U.): get it done & report back to the chief. It was reported last month that when other diplomats & staff asked Sondland what his authority was to run the Ukraine operation, Sondland replied, "The President*." What might have been dismissed as boasting has turned out to be true. Trump didn't "lose confidence" is Yovanovitch, as John Sullivan told her after she was recalled; rather, Trump had confidence that she wasn't a person who would do his personal bidding. And Sondland was. Trump is now publicly attacking Yovanovitch because, like Jim Comey & others, she is not "loyal" to him. To Trump, "loyal" is a euphemism for "willing to do my dirty work." Trump has little use for honorable public servants. His euphemism for those people is "deep state."

Greg Miller, et al., of the Washington Post: "For two weeks [this summer, a CIA analyst] pored over notes of alarming conversations with White House officials, reviewed details from interagency memos on the U.S. relationship with Ukraine and scanned public statements by President Trump. He wove this material into a nine-page memo outlining evidence that Trump had abused the powers of his office to try to coerce Ukraine into helping him get reelected. Then, on Aug. 12, the analyst hit 'send.' His decision to report what he had learned to the U.S. intelligence community's inspector general has transformed the political landscape of the United States, triggering a rapid-moving impeachment inquiry that now imperils Trump's presidency. Over the past three months, the allegations made in that document have been overwhelmingly substantiated -- by the sworn testimony of administration officials, the inadvertent admissions of Trump's acting chief of staff and, most importantly, the president's own words, as captured on a record of his July 25 call with the leader of Ukraine.... It is not clear whether any of this would have come to light were it not for the actions of a relatively junior CIA employee, who is now the target of almost daily attacks by Trump and right-wing efforts to make his identity widely public." (Also linked yesterday.)

** The New Red Scare. Julia Davis in the Daily Beast: "As Russia's state media watch impeachment proceedings against U.S. President Donald J. Trump they're loving what they see.... They listen in delight as Republicans parrot conspiracy theories first launched by Russians. And they gloat about the way Trump removed U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch, because they blame her for promoting democratic 'color revolutions' that weakened Moscow's hold on the former Soviet empire. Best of all, from the Kremlin's point of view, they see Trump pushing Ukraine back into the Russian fold.... Instead of disseminating their usual conspiracy theories, the Russians watch gleefully as the Republicans do that for them. From the long-debunked 'Crowdstrike' cyber plot positioning Ukraine as the fall guy for what undoubtedly was Russian interference in the 2016 elections, to anti-Semitic conspiracy theories centering around Jewish financier and philanthropist George Soros, rivers of Russian dezinformatsiya are flowing down from the President of the United States and the GOP, through the impeachment hearings, to Trump's cult-like devotees." (Also linked yesterday.)

CBS News has David Holmes' opening statement in a lot more readable form than is CNN's purloined copy, linked yesterday. (Also linked yesterday.)

Charles Pierce: David "Holmes's statement is detailed and damning. It's also faintly hilarious that the whole case may be broken because two old men talked too loudly on their cellphones.*... Holmes's statement ... [Gordon] Sondland squarely back on the hook for having once told Congress that he'd had no contact with anyone at the White House on these matters.... And ... it leaves the president* and his enablers with no defense left except to say that, yes, the president* did it, but it's not impeachable.... If there's a gun left here that isn't smoking, I can't find it." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~

     ~~~ * Mrs. McCrabbie: I don't think we know what kind of device Trump was shouting at. ~~~

     ~~~ On another note, how can what now appears to be at least a ten-month effort (December 2018 to September 2019) to abuse presidential power in a scheme that endangered U.S. national security, subverted legal & Constitutional separation of powers, and tried to extort an allied foreign leader while helping a hostile foreign nation (Russia) not be impeachable? Republicans want you to believe the whole scandal boils down to an inadvertent slip-of-the-tongue -- "I'd like you to do us a favor though" -- in a phone conversation. (We'll soon be hearing, "The readout isn't even an exact transcript! Maybe he didn't say "though"; maybe he never said "favor.")

Akhilleus wrote something in yesterday's Comments that makes me fairly ashamed of myself because never once have I thought about what he wrote, looked it up, or "just knew it." Yet it's somewhat obvious: "The word of the moment is subpoena. This medieval Latin construction meaning 'under penalty', that is, subject to penalty if one disregards or ignores the summons, has been much in the news of late."

Paul Farhi of the Washington Post takes a look at Ken Vogel's reporting for both the New York Times & Politico on then-Veep Joe Biden's role in Ukraine. In the Times story, published in May 2019, Vogel didn't mention till the 19th paragraph that "No evidence has surfaced that the former vice president intentionally tried to help his son by pressing for the prosecutor general's dismissal." Mrs. McC: The NYT story first mentioned Giuliani in the 10th paragraph. Knowing what we know now, this sentence from Paragraph 10 is a hoot: "Mr. Giuliani's involvement raises questions about whether Mr. Trump is endorsing an effort to push a foreign government to proceed with a case that could hurt a political opponent at home." Farhi: "As a staff writer at Politico in early 2017, [Vogel] co-authored another piece that suggested that the Democratic National Committee had cooperated with Ukrainian efforts to thwart Republican candidate Donald Trump in the 2016 campaign.... Vogel's articles have been called into question -- the Times story most prominently by Biden's presidential campaign, and the Politico story by Politico's own recent reporting." ~~~

     ~~~ It seems to me these stories are very much like the Times coverage of Clinton's e-mail usage, although Vogel may get less wrong than Michael Schmidt & others at the Times did about Clinton. There's nothing wrong, of course, about reporting on political controversies, but in Vogel's case, he skews the story in the direction of what has turned out to be false. He implicates both Biden & Trump/Giuliani, and the tone of the story suggests Biden did something wrong. Even though Vogel suggests that Trump, via Giuliani, may have been behind the story, a reader would assume that Biden, whether intentionally or not, helped his son Hunter. As it turns out, Biden's successful effort to get rid of a corrupt Ukraine prosecutor would have put Hunter in more jeopardy, not less. You sure can't glean that from Vogel's NYT story. And, as Farhi points out, Republicans have used Vogel's reporting during the impeachment hearings to implicate Biden and justify Trump's supposed "concerns about corruption in Ukraine."

In yesterday's Comments, Forrest M. kindly reminded us of this:

~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: Hillary gets the last laugh. She won the popular vote by a substantial margin, and she has had to put up with a lot less guff from the vast right-wing conspiracy than she would have had she also won the Electoral College. And, of course, Roger there is going to prison, barring a grant of clemency by the Great Orange Blob.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Neil Vigdor of the New York Times: "President Trump underwent a two-hour doctor's examination on Saturday at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, which the White House said was part of a routine annual physical and included lab work. The appointment was not on the president's schedule, in contrast to a previous physical that Mr. Trump had in February, also at Walter Reed outside Washington. In a statement, Stephanie Grisham, the White House press secretary, said Mr. Trump, 73, was taking advantage of a free weekend to begin portions of his annual physical, and was anticipating a busy schedule in 2020. She did not specify what types of tests Mr. Trump had." Mrs. McC: That sounds like a lie. ~~~

     ~~~ CNN's report is here. A video report is embedded in the page. Jessica McBride of Heavy: "A contributor for the Hill who writes on veterans issues and used to work for the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs is claiming that ... Donald Trump visited Walter Reed National Medical Center due to chest discomfort. That's a different story from the White House statement on Trump's November 16, 2019 visit, which said Trump was undergoing 'portions' of a routine annual exam." Mrs. McC: The cause of "chest discomfort" could be one too many portions of McDonalds fries. The fact that Trump was reportedly at the hospital for only two hours suggests to me that he didn't have a serious medical issue. I'm having a four-hour test this week for possible heart issues, and I have not experienced any chest discomfort.

But He's Jewish! Brett Samuels of the Hill: "The White House is standing by senior adviser Stephen Miller as he faces calls from dozens of Democrats to resign after newly released emails showed he circulated material linked to white nationalism to conservative media before joining the administration.... 'I work with Stephen. I know Stephen. He loves this country and hates bigotry in all forms -- and it deeply concerns me as to why so many on the left consistently attack Jewish members of this Administration,' deputy White House press secretary Hogan Gidley said in a statement." Mrs. McC: Gidley is hiding Miller's racism behind an overt implication that "the left" is anti-Semitic. The answer to that is, "But the e-mails!" The pretense that a member of one minority can't be prejudiced against another is ludicrous, and the specific observation that Stephen Miller "hates bigotry in all forms" is disproved by voluminous evidence to the contrary.

Louisiana Gubernatorial Race 2019. Laissez les Bons Temps Rouler. Rick Rojas & Jeremy Alford of the New York Times: "Gov. John Bel Edwards of Louisiana, the only Democratic governor in the Deep South, narrowly won re-election Saturday, overcoming the intervention of President Trump, who visited the state multiple times in an effort to help Mr. Edward's Republican challenger and demonstrate his own clout. It was the second blow at the ballot box for Mr. Trump this month in a Republican-leaning state, following the Democratic victory in the Kentucky governor's race, where the president also campaigned for the G.O.P. candidate. In Louisiana, Mr. Trump had wagered significant political capital to try to lift Eddie Rispone, a businessman who ran against Mr. Edwards in large part by embracing the president and his agenda. Mr. Trump campaigned for Mr. Rispone twice in the final two weeks of the race, warning Louisiana voters that a loss would reflect poorly on his presidency -- the same appeal he made in Kentucky earlier this month to try to help Gov. Matt Bevin, who ultimately lost." The Baton Rouge Advocate's report, by Mark Ballard, is here. ~~~

~~~ The New York Times has parish-by-parish votes here. Alex Isenstadt of Politico writes about why Rispone's loss was a big loss for Trump, who invested heavily in the Louisiana gubernatorial election.

Presidential Race 2020. Brianne Pfannenstiel of the Des Moines Register: "Pete Buttigieg has rocketed to the top of the latest Des Moines Register/CNN/Mediacom Iowa Poll in the latest reshuffling of the top tier of 2020 Democratic presidential candidates. Since September, Buttigieg has risen 16 percentage points among Iowa's likely Democratic caucusgoers, with 25% now saying he is their first choice for president. For the first time in the Register's Iowa Poll, he bests rivals Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, who are now clustered in competition for second place and about 10 percentage points behind the South Bend, Indiana, mayor. Warren, a U.S. senator from Massachusetts, led the September Iowa Poll, when 22% said she was their first choice. In this poll, her support slips to 16%. Former Vice President Biden, who led the Register's first three Iowa Polls of the 2020 caucus cycle, has continued to slide, falling 5 percentage points to 15%. Sanders, a U.S. senator from Vermont, also garners 15% -- a 4 percentage point rise." ~~~

     ~~~ Mrs. McCrabbie: As much as I've paid attention (which isn't much), Buttigieg is the only presidential candidate running New Hampshire-specific ads on the cable news networks. (I assume these are area rollovers of the nationwide feed.)

Beyond the Beltway

Colorado. Radio Host Flunks Trump Loyalty Test, Is Fired on Air. Sam Tabachnik of the Denver Post: "Craig Silverman, a former chief deputy district attorney in Denver and talk-show host on the conservative 710 KNUS radio station, said he was fired mid-show Saturday after criticizing ... Donald Trump. Silverman was in the middle of a segment about Roy Cohn, Trump's former personal attorney, when he suddenly was interrupted by network news, he told The Denver Post.... Program director Kelly Michaels came through the door. 'You're done,' Silverman recounted Michaels as saying. The former prosecutor, who has hosted 'The Craig Silverman Show' from 9 a.m. to noon on Saturdays for more than five years, responded to the sudden firing on Twitter. 'I cannot and will not toe strict Trump party line. I call things as I see them,' he tweeted. 'I see corruption and blatant dishonesty by President and his cronies. I also see bullying/smearing of American heroes w/courage to take oath and tell truth. Their bravery inspires me.'" Mrs. McC: No word on what programming filled the rest of Tabachnik's show-time. Sousa marches? "Hail to the Chief"?

North Carolina. Ally Mutnick (Nov. 15): "North Carolina Republicans approved a new congressional map Friday that would cost the party at least two House seats and potentially roil the state's delegation -- but Democrats immediately objected, saying it's still a GOP gerrymander. Republicans represent 10 of the state's 13 districts and would be very likely to lose two seats: those held by Republican Reps. George Holding and Mark Walker. Democrats, though, argue the new map doesn't go far enough and quickly challenged it in state court."