The Conversation -- February 26, 2025
Sabrina Rodriguez & Sammy Westfall of the Washington Post: "... Donald Trump posted to his Truth Social account late Tuesday an apparently AI-generated video that takes viewers on a dreamlike journey through an alternate-reality version of the Gaza Strip, remade according to his proposal for the United States to 'own' the territory.... 'No more tunnels, no more fear. Trump Gaza is finally here,' a voice sings to an electronic dance beat. 'Trump Gaza, shining bright. Golden future, a brand-new life.'... It features AI-generated shots of a massive gold statue of Trump towering over a traffic circle, a toddler holding a large gold balloon of Trump's head and bazaar-like gift shops lined with Trump figurines. In several scenes, dollar bills fall from the sky, including over a suit-clad Musk dancing on the beach.... On Wednesday morning, critics of the president took to social media to slam his posting of the video, with many describing it as callous and disturbing.... Even on his own platform, Truth Social, some viewers found the video strange or distasteful." Thanks to RAS for the heads-up. MB: I thought about posting the video here. But, no, it's too offensive. ~~~
~~~ Akhilleus has some thoughts about the video in today's Comments.
President* Musk Holds His First Cabinet Meeting. Alex Gangitano of the Hill: Elon "Musk ... was dominant at the opening of the Cabinet meeting, offering a number of sharp comments toward the federal workforce while standing and taking questions from the press.... Musk ... defended his email demanding all federal workers report their accomplishments to his office, calling it a 'pulse check' and saying anyone with a heartbeat and neurons could complete it.... 'There are fictional individuals collecting paychecks,' Musk said of the government, though he did not offer specific evidence that people are fraudulently getting paychecks.... 'Is anyone unhappy with Elon? If you are, we'll throw them out of here,' Trump asked the room [of actual Cabinet secretaries] at one point...."
No More Birds, No More Bees. No More Bushes, No More Trees. Marie: I thought Akhilleus was kidding when he claimed in today's Comments "that a biodiversity conference in Hawaii was canceled because Fat Hitler's Agriculture Secretary thinks biodiversity is DEI." But no. He found that Secretary Brooke Rollins has proudly posted a press release announcing the Department has cancelled a "frivolous Biden-era contract" for $11K for a conference room rental for a USDA biodiversity meeting in Hawaii. It's quite impressive that in only a month, the Trump administration has figured out how to end life on earth. In addition, Karl Schneider of the Indy Star reports that "The USDA revoked a federal tree-planting grant to Keep Indianapolis Beautiful in a move the nonprofit's CEO said may be the result of anti-DEI initiatives coming from the Trump Administration.... The use of the words 'biodiversity' and 'equity' may have been the reason the grant was revoked, [Jeremy] Kranowitz [-- president of Keep Indianapolis Beautiful --] hypothesized." They. Are. Nitwits.
DOJ Nominees Testify Trump Can Ignore Court Orders. Devlin Barrett of the New York Times: "Lawyers for ... [Donald] Trump in line to take top jobs at the Justice Department sparred with Democrats on Wednesday over whether the administration could simply ignore some court orders -- an early skirmish in a larger fight over the White House's efforts to claim more sweeping presidential powers. The debate, before the Senate Judiciary Committee, unfolded as three nominees testified during a confirmation hearing to join the upper ranks of the Justice Department. Two of the nominees, Harmeet K. Dhillon and D. John Sauer, have long worked as personal lawyers for Mr. Trump. The third, Aaron Reitz, selected to lead the Office of Legal Policy, was questioned about an old social media post in which he suggested that Mr. Trump follow the example set by President Andrew Jackson, who ignored a Supreme Court order in 1832. 'There is no hard and fast rule about whether, in every instance a public official is bound by a court decision,' he said Wednesday.... Democrats have raised concerns that the Trump administration might ignore not just lower court decisions, but also appellate decisions or Supreme Court rulings.... Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, said some Supreme Court decisions were wrong and should have been fought more vigorously by government officials." ~~~
~~~ Marie: Sauer was the attorney who argued before the Supreme Court that the president* should be immune from prosecution for ordering a Navy SEAL team to assassinate his political opponent.
Adam Liptak of the New York Times: "The Supreme Court heard arguments on Wednesday over an employment discrimination suit filed by a straight woman who twice lost positions to gay workers. The case comes two years after the Supreme Court struck down race-conscious admissions programs in higher education and amid the Trump administration's fierce efforts to root out programs that promote diversity. While some conservative groups have hoped the case will yield a major statement on efforts to diversify the workplace, it seemed likely to produce a modest decision saying merely that a key civil rights law applied equally to all employees.... The court seemed likely to issue a brief and perhaps unanimous decision in favor of the woman, Marlean A. Ames."
Bezos argues for personal liberties. But his news organization now will forbid views other than his own in its opinion section.... There is no doubt in my mind that he is doing this out of fear of the consequences for his other business interests. -- Marty Baron, former WashPo executive editor, in a statement
This is what Oligarch ownership of the media looks like.... The second-richest guy in the world, Bezos, owns The Washington Post. He has now declared that the editorial page of that paper is going Trump right-wing. Surprise, Mr. Musk agrees. We must support independent media. -- Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), on X ~~~
~~~ This Is Not Mrs. Graham's Washington Post. Benjamin Mullin of the New York Times: "Jeff Bezos, the owner of The Washington Post, announced a major shift to the newspaper's opinion section on Wednesday, saying it would now advocate 'personal liberties and free markets' and not publish opposing viewpoints on those topics. Mr. Bezos said the section's editor, David Shipley, was leaving the paper in response to the change. 'I am of America and for America, and proud to be so,' Mr. Bezos said. 'Our country did not get here by being typical. And a big part of America's success has been freedom in the economic realm and everywhere else. Freedom is ethical -- it minimizes coercion -- and practical; it drives creativity, invention and prosperity.' In his note, Mr. Bezos said that he had asked Mr. Shipley whether he wanted to stay at The Post, and that Mr. Shipley had declined. 'I suggested to him that if the answer wasn't "hell yes," then it had to be "no,"' Mr. Bezos wrote." The AP's report is here. ~~~
~~~ Washington Post Staff: "Bezos said that The Post no longer needs to offer a 'broad-based opinion section' because of a diversity of opinions available online.... Post publisher and CEO William Lewis told staffers in an email Wednesday that the change was not about 'siding with any political party.'" MB: Looks as if Jennifer Rubin, a Post columnist who left the paper a couple of weeks ago, saw the Bezos scrawl on the wall. ~~~
~~~ Robert Reich: Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk & Mark Zuckerberg "were in the first row at Trump's inauguration. They, and other billionaires, have now exposed themselves for what they are. They are the oligarchy. They continue to siphon off the wealth of the nation. They are supporting a tyrant who is promising them tax cuts and regulatory rollbacks that will make them even richer, and destroying democracy so they won't have to worry about 'parasites' (as Musk calls people who depend on government assistance) demanding anything more from them.... When [billionaires] talk of 'personal liberties and free markets' they mean their own liberties to become even richer and more powerful, as the rest of America slides into worse economic insecurity and fear."
Unvaccinated Child Dies from Measles. RFKJ Says "Meh." Devi Shastri & Amanda Seitz of the AP: "A child who wasn't vaccinated died in a measles outbreak in rural West Texas, state officials said Wednesday, the first U.S. death from the highly contagious respiratory disease since 2015. The school-aged child had been hospitalized and died Tuesday night amid the widespread outbreak, Texas' largest in nearly 30 years. Since it began last month, a rash of 124 cases has erupted across nine counties.... Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nation's top health official and a vaccine critic, said Wednesday that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is 'watching' cases, though he did not provide specifics on how the federal agency is assisting. He dismissed Texas' outbreak as 'not unusual' during a Wednesday meeting of ... Donald Trump's Cabinet members." MB: A "rash" of cases? Really?
~~~~~~~~~~
Catie Edmondson, et al., of the New York Times: "The House on Tuesday narrowly passed a Republican budget resolution that calls for $4.5 trillion in tax cuts and a $2 trillion reduction in federal spending over a decade, clearing the way for major elements of ... [Donald] Trump's domestic agenda. The nearly party-line vote of 217 to 215 teed up a bitter fight within the G.O.P. over which federal programs to slash to partially finance a huge tax cut that would provide its biggest benefits to rich Americans. It came after a head-spinning hour in which Republican leaders tried to put down a revolt among conservatives who wanted deeper spending cuts, failed to do so, canceled the budget vote and then reversed course minutes later and summoned lawmakers to call the roll. The chaotic scene underscored the unwieldy path House Republicans have ahead of them as they try to push through Mr. Trump's domestic policy agenda through Congress over the objections of Democrats. Approval of the budget plan was a crucial first step for Republicans to smooth the way through Congress for an enormous fiscal package using a process called reconciliation, which allows such bills to steer clear of a filibuster and pass the Senate on a simple-majority vote." ~~~
~~~ Marie: Here's one humorous note: One "of the holdouts, Representative Victoria Spartz of Indiana..., said she received a 'personal commitment' from Mr. Trump to 'save health care and make it better.'" That's right; Spartz changed her vote on a promise from Trump that he would make healthcare programs better. That's the same promise he's failed to even come close to fulfilling on for the decade he was trying to tank Obamacare. Did he tell her he had a concept of a plan?
~~~ Margot Sanger-Katz & Alicia Parlapiano of the New York Times: "What can House Republicans cut instead of Medicaid? Not much." To pass the bill through reconciiiation, which avoids a Senate filibuster, they must find $880 billion in cuts over the next ten years, and these cuts must come from programs the House Energy and Commerce Committee oversees. "If the budget resolution is going to become public policy, it will require legislation that cuts health programs. Almost a trillion dollars is a lot of money, even in federal budget terms, and health care is where the money is." ~~~
~~~ Oh, Dear. Jared Gans of the Hill: A "poll from Hart Research conducted for the nonprofit Families Over Billionaires, which advocates in opposition to tax cuts for the wealthy, found 71 percent of voters who backed Trump said cutting Medicaid would be unacceptable. Voters overall were even more opposed to it, with 82 percent saying so. Six in 10 Trump voters also said cutting food and nutrition programs would be unacceptable." MB: This is not because Trump voters have suddenly become bleeding hearts dedicated to helping poor people. Rather, it's because many of them are poor people who need assistance programs like Medicaid & food stamps (SNAP).
Marianne LeVine of the Washington Post: "... Donald Trump said Tuesday that he will replace a controversial visa program for foreign investors with a new initiative to sell $5 million 'gold cards' to wealthy individuals looking for a path to U.S. citizenship. 'They'll be wealthy and they'll be successful,' Trump said in the Oval Office. 'And they'll be spending a lot of money and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people.'... The president shared few details on requirements, aside from the $5 million payment, but said those who buy the gold cards will be given green-card privileges and 'a route to citizenship.'... He said Tuesday that the gold cards will help bring in 'very high-level people' and claimed that companies such as Apple could buy the cards Immigration experts expressed skepticism that the Trump administration could enact the change without Congress, though the president insisted he could do so unilaterally because he was 'not doing citizenship.'... Muzaffar Chishti ... [of] the Migration Policy Institute, said that only Congress can end the EB-5 visa program for investors that Trump and [Commerce Secretary Howard] Lutnick want to replace." The AP's report is here. ~~~
~~~ Marie: Some of you expressed shock yesterday at this Oligarchs Invitational, but it's new only in that Trump & Lutnick ballooned the price of admission. Congress created the EB-5 visa program in 1990, and the current minimum investment to qualify is $800K. As to these "very high-level people" paying a lot of taxes, the whole idea of the budget proposal the House passed last night was to lower taxes for "very high-level people." So that's bull. Plus, it's pathetic that Trump thinks "rich" and "very high-level" are the same thing.
Palling Around with Despots. Peter Baker of the New York Times: "In a move that redrew the international order, Mr. Trump this week had the United States vote against a U.N. General Assembly resolution condemning Russia's invasion of Ukraine on the third anniversary of the war. Among the countries that Mr. Trump joined in siding with Russia? North Korea, Belarus and Sudan. [And, as RAS pointed out, Iran.] Those he stood against? Britain, France, Germany, Canada, Italy, Japan and most of the rest of the world. It would be hard to think of a starker demonstration of how radically Mr. Trump is recalibrating America's place in the world.... He is positioning the United States in the camp of the globe's chief rogue states in opposition to the countries that have been America's best friends.... If the United States is going to align itself with international outcasts..., it could force Europe, Canada and Asian allies like Japan and South Korea to go their own way and look elsewhere for alliances. At the same time, Mr. Trump's deference to Moscow has allowed Russia out of the diplomatic isolation chamber that Washington and the West sought to construct in the three years since its full-fledged invasion of Ukraine."
Petty, Vindictive Little Swine. Perry Stein & Jeremy Roebuck of the Washington Post: "... Donald Trump is targeting the elite Washington law firm that is representing former special counsel Jack Smith, issuing a directive that would strip some of its lawyers of their security clearances and examine the firm's government contracts. The order signed Tuesday afternoon called for suspending the security clearance of any attorney at Covington & Burling who the Trump administration concludes was involved in representing Smith while he was special counsel. It also directs federal agencies to limit their interactions with Covington & Burling and assess government contracts with the firm to align 'funding decisions with the interests of the citizens of the United States.' The firm has been providing pro bono personal legal services to Smith.... Legal experts said the action is unlikely to have widespread implications for Covington & Burling, because the firm's revenue does not come from government contracts and relatively few attorneys have cases that regularly require security clearances.
"As he signed the directive, Trump suggested that he should send the pen to Smith, before tossing it to one of the reporters in the audience. When asked if he was targeting the law firm, Trump replied: 'I was targeted. ... Don't talk to me about targeting.'" Politico's report is here.
Jeff Stein, et al., of the Washington Post: "Over the last several days, more than a dozen federal agencies, primarily led by Trump-appointed Cabinet secretaries, told employees that they did not need to comply with a Musk directive to email a list of what they had done in the past week. The rebuke was the most striking display yet of internal dissatisfaction with DOGE's moves across the federal government.... But Musk has fought back, publicly condemning those who resisted and calling for federal employees to face a second order to explain their work accomplishments. His DOGE team, meanwhile, escalated its multipronged assault on the bureaucracy, preparing for a new round of even more sweeping layoffs and moving to cancel additional grants and other forms of federal spending.... Musk's surrogates, for instance, have in recent days directed the Department of Veterans Affairs to cut more than 800 existing federal contracts.... DOGE helped implement at least a partial freeze on government credit cards, ceasing the work of employees who need to bill expenses."
Ask Amy. Name of Mystery Woman Revealed. Here's some news. After attorneys for the White House were unable to answer federal judges' simple questions about who headed up DOGE, the White House finally found somebody willing to pretend she's in charge of DOGE: "The White House confirmed Tuesday that Amy Gleason, who used to work for the firm founded by DOGE adviser Brad Smith, will be the U.S. DOGE Service administrator. (Musk himself is officially a 'special government employee' who's advising the White House and DOGE's effort, the administration has said.)" ~~~
~~~ Update. Here's a full WashPo story on Gleason's new job: "Gleason's appointment is unlikely to change any perception that Musk is in charge of DOGE, but it answers a key question as to its organizational structure." The AP's story is here. ~~~
~~~ Luckily, it won't matter who's in charge, because DOGE is planning to have AI fire federal workers. It will be this fabulously efficient automated system where nobody is responsible for those pink slips. Think of the boon this is to supervisors who have a smidgen of empathy left and feel bad about destroying the lives of people who have dedicated themselves to public service. It's a great concept! Genius! as Trump would say: ~~~
~~~ David Edwards of the Raw Story: "Employees connected to Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) are reportedly updating government software that would automate the firing of federal workers.... Wired revealed that DOGE had obtained access to a Department of Defense software program called AutoRIF -- which is shorthand for Automated Reduction in Force. The software was designed to create lists of employees eligible to be fired.... 'With new software and the use of AI, some government employees fear that large-scale terminations could roll out even more quickly,' Wired reported." ~~~
~~~ Marie: The system could automatically send the pink slips in cardboard boxes that the fired employees then could use to load up the decades' worth of tchotchkes & family photos they had cluttered their space with. Perhaps there would still have to be some human contact in order to collect the employees' badges and key cards or whatever, though maybe these could be sent to HR through a pneumatic tube or something. Oh, be sure to deduct the cost of the cardboard boxes from their final paychecks.
Well, maybe not fraud, but I'll give ya waste and abuse ~~~
~~~ Julian Barnes of the New York Times: "Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said on Tuesday that more than 100 intelligence officers from 15 agencies had been fired for having sexually explicit discussions on a government chat tool. The chat program was administered by the National Security Agency and intended for discussions of sensitive security matters. But a group of employees used it for discussions that contained sexual themes, intelligence officials said this week. The chats also include explicit discussion of gender transition surgeryofficials said. Transcripts of the chat were first disclosed Monday by Christopher Rufo, a conservative activist who writes for City Journal."
Emily Davies & Hannah Natanson of the Washington Post: "Veterans Affairs Secretary Douglas A. Collins took to social media on Tuesday to tout sweeping cuts to contracts that he said would save the department nearly $2 billion without touching core services. But the 875 contracts on the chopping block help cover medical services, fund cancer programs, recruit doctors and provide burial services to veterans, according to internal VA documents.... Sen. Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, said in a statement Tuesday...[,] 'This is just another reckless cost-cutting decision that will harm veterans and tax payers for years to come.'" MB: Traditionally, most politicians did not boast about stiffing ailing or dying veterans, but this is MAGA and I suppose those veterans are suckers and losers.
In the Dark of Night, DOGE Deletes Its Fake Receipts. David Fahrenthold, et al., of the New York Times: "Last week, Elon Musk's government cost-slashing initiative ... posted an online 'wall of receipts,' celebrating how much it had saved by canceling federal contracts. Now the organization ... has deleted all of the five biggest 'savings' on that original list, after The New York Times and other media outlets pointed out they were riddled with errors. The last of the original top five disappeared from the site in the early hours of Tuesday, even as the group claimed in its latest update that its savings to date had increased to $65 billion. The website offered no explanation for why it removed some items or how it arrived at the higher total.... The 'wall of receipts' is the only public ledger the organization has produced to document its work. The scale of that ledger's errors -- and the misunderstandings and poor quality control that seemed to underlie them -- has raised questions about the effort's broader work, which has led to mass firings and cutbacks across the federal government." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~
~~~ Ryan Foley of the AP: "Nearly 40% of the federal contracts that ... Donald Trump's administration claims to have canceled as part of its signature cost-cutting program aren't expected to save the government any money, the administration's own data shows. The Department of Government Efficiency ... published an updated list Monday of nearly 2,300 contracts that agencies terminated in recent weeks across the federal government. Data published on DOGE's 'Wall of Receipts' shows that more than one-third of the contract cancellations, 794 in all, are expected to yield no savings. That's usually because the total value of the contracts has already been fully obligated, which means the government has a legal requirement to spend the fund for the goods or services it purchased and in many cases has already done so." (Also linked yesterday.)
Desmond Butler, et al., of the Washington Post: "Over the years, [Elon] Musk and his businesses have received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies and tax credits, often at critical moments, a Washington Post analysis has found, helping seed the growth that has made him the world's richest person.... The total amount is probably larger: This analysis includes only publicly available contracts, omitting classified defense and intelligence work for the federal government. SpaceX has been developing spy satellites for ... the Pentagon's spy satellite division.... The Wall Street Journal reported that contract was worth $1.8 billion.... The Post found nearly a dozen other local grants, reimbursements and tax credits where the specific amount of money is not public. An additional 52 ongoing contracts with seven government agencies ... are on track to potentially pay Musk's companies an additional $11.8 billion over the next few years.... DOGE ... has sought to cut staff, slash budgets or cut contracts at all seven of the agencies where Musk's companies have ongoing contracts."
Brian Slodysko & Byron Tau of the AP: "More than 20 civil service employees resigned Tuesday from ... Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, saying they were refusing to use their technical expertise to 'dismantle critical public services.' 'We swore to serve the American people and uphold our oath to the Constitution across presidential administrations,' the 21 staffers wrote in a joint resignation letter.... 'However, it has become clear that we can no longer honor those commitments.' The employees also warned that many of those enlisted by Musk to help him slash the size of the federal government under ... Donald Trump's administration were political ideologues who did not have the necessary skills or experience for the task ahead of them. The mass resignation of engineers, data scientists, designers and product managers is a temporary setback for Musk and the Republican president's tech-driven purge of the federal workforce. It comes amid a flurry of court challenges that have sought to stall, stop or unwind their efforts to fire or coerce thousands of government workers out of jobs." (Also linked yesterday.)
Rachel Roubein & Lena Sun of the Washington Post: "After several thousand probationary workers across the nation's health department were fired in what some dubbed a 'Valentine's Day massacre,' the government ha quietly asked some to return to their jobs regulating the nation's food supply, providing help for 9/11 responders and reviewing medical devices.... Patient advocacy groups had decried the firings, saying that they would erode the country's standing as a global health leader, and well-funded lobbying groups rushed to save some government slots that were in part funded by the private sector, not taxpayer dollars. The rehirings are also the latest wrinkle in the chaotic rollout of ... Donald Trump's effort to shrink and weaken the federal government via billionaire Elon Musk's U.S. DOGE Service." (Also linked yesterday.)
Zach Montague of the New York Times: "A federal judge on Tuesday directed the Trump administration to unfreeze foreign aid funding within two days after indications that it was failing to comply with a previous court order to keep money flowing to aid groups around the world. The State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development must release the funds and pay a number of bills by 11:59 p.m. Eastern time on Wednesday, Judge Amir H. Ali of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia ruled. Judge Ali had ordered the Trump administration on Feb. 13 to keep disbursing the funds pending the outcome of a lawsuit brought by two health organizations affected by ... [Donald] Trump's executive order to pause most foreign aid for 90 days." (Also linked yesterday.)
David Nakamura & Teo Armus of the Washington Post: "A federal judge in Seattle on Tuesday temporarily blocked the Trump administration's sweeping ban on refugee admissions, saying the presidential executive order represented an improper nullification of congressional authority. U.S. District Judge Jamal N. Whitehead's granting of apreliminary injunction effectively requires the administration to restart the refugee-admissions program that ... Donald Trump shut down last month as part of a series of actions aimed at tightening immigration controls. The judge's order will remain in place while the case is adjudicated." The AP's report is here. (Also linked yesterday.)
Silvia Foster-Frau & Vanessa Herrero of the Washington Post: "The Trump administration flew nearly 180 migrants from the United States to Guantánamo and deported all of them to Venezuela on Thursday. The Post spoke with three men who were detained in the U.S. military prison that has been used to house suspected terrorists since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. All had crossed the border illegally, and although Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem called the migrants transported to Cuba the 'worst of the worst,' The Post could find no other criminal record for those interviewed. [Diuvar] Uzcátegui, José Daniel Simancas and Franyer Montes said they were denied calls to lawyers or loved ones after repeated pleas. They said they were subjected to humiliating and invasive strip searches. They described prolonged periods in isolation, with only two one-hour opportunities to go outside over two weeks.... The migrants' conditions in Guantánamo 'were horrific, and are far more restrictive, more severe and more abusive than what we would see in a typical immigration detention facility in the United States,' said Eunice Cho ... [of] the ACLU National Prison Project."
Fifth Amendment? Never Heard of It. Ariana Figueroa of the Daily Montanan, republished by the Raw Story: "Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem late Tuesday announced a campaign to compel people in the United States without legal authority to register with the U.S. government and then self-deport.... Noem said in a press release that if a person without legal status fails to register online, that person will be subject to a fine, imprisonment or both.... Registering would require submitting fingerprint information and other personal information. Adults and children 14 and older would be required to register."
⭐They're Really Trying to Kill Us. Maxine Joselow of the Washington Post: "Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin has privately urged the White House to strike down a scientific finding underpinning much of the federal government's push to combat climate change.... The 2009 'endangerment finding' cleared the way for regulating greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act by concluding that the planet-warming gases pose a threat to public health and welfare. Both the Obama and Biden administrations used that determination to set strict limits on emissions from cars and power plants. By repealing the endangerment finding, the Trump administration would be taking one of its most consequential steps yet to derail federal climate efforts. In recent days, the administration has also blocked work that is central to international climate research and barred federal scientists and diplomats from attending a major climate event in China." ~~~
~~~ All the Best People. Hiroko Tabuchi of the New York Times: "Formaldehyde, the chemical of choice for undertakers and embalmers..., can also cause cancer and severe respiratory problems. So, in 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency began a new effort to regulate it. The chemicals industry fought back with an intensity that astonished even seasoned agency officials. Its campaign was led by Lynn Dekleva, then a lobbyist at the American Chemistry Council, an industry group that spends millions of dollars on government lobbying. Dr. Dekleva is now at the E.P.A. in a crucial job: She runs an office that has the authority to approve new chemicals for use. Earlier she spent 32 years at Dupont, the chemical maker, before joining the E.P.A. in the first Trump administration. Her most recent employer, the chemicals lobbying group, has made reversing the Environmental Protection Agency's course on formaldehyde a priority and is pushing to abolish a program under which the agency assess[es] the risks of chemicals to human health." ~~~
~~~ Marie: So this is one of many Trumpity policies designed to kill people, but the upside is that those who die because of Dekleva's regulatory rollback will be pre-embalmed.
Naftali Bendavid & Maeve Reston of the Washington Post: "Rowdy crowds are showing up at lawmakers&r' town hall meetings to protest ... Donald Trump's actions. Some people are launching into chants like 'No king!' or shouting down Republican House members. Sen. Bernie Sanders is drawing overflow crowds of his own as he seeks to mobilize voters against Trump's budget cuts. At the same time, a coalition of Democratic state attorneys general is methodically filing lawsuits against Trump's orders, and in six out of seven cases, it has been successful in persuading judges to halt them. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic Governors Association and liberal groups are seeing a surge in fundraising. And Democratic members of Congress are seizing on a budget clash as an opportunity to coalesce against the president's plans. Little by little, after an initial phase of stunned confusion, the broader resistance to Trump is beginning to wake up." ~~~
~~~ Marie: My own Congressional delegation (100% Democratic) is a waste of space. I called them all last week, and when I complained my rep was doing nothing to fight Trump, she sent me a fucking fundraising letter asked me to send her money to fight Trump. What? She can't afford a bus ticket to anti-Trump rally? I wrote her a scathing response and dared her staff to put it in front of her face. She'll be hearing from me again. ~~~
~~~ What to do?? What to do? How about putting your hands over your ears and saying "La La La La" very loudly. Or here's what GOP leadership is suggesting: ~~~
~~~ Melanie Zanona, et al., of NBC News: "House Republicans are becoming weary and wary of in-person town hall meetings after a number of lawmakers have faced hometown crowds angry about the Trump administration's push to slash government programs and staffing. Party leaders suggest that if lawmakers feel the need to hold such events, they do tele-town halls or at least vet attendees to avoid scenes that become viral clips, according to GOP sources. A GOP aide said House Republican leaders are urging lawmakers to stop engaging in them altogether."
The iPhone Really Is a Smartphone. Tripp Mickle & Eli Tan of the New York Times: "While using Apple's automatic dictation feature to send messages on Tuesday, some iPhone users reported seeing ... the word 'racist' temporarily appearing as 'Trump,' before quickly correcting itself. The message blip, which was replicated several times by The New York Times, provoked controversy after appearing in a viral TikTok post, raising questions about Apple's artificial intelligence capabilities. An Apple spokeswoman blamed the issue on phonetic overlap between the two words, and said the company was working on a fix." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~
~~~ Marie: Say what? There is absolutely no "phonetic overlap" between the words "racist" and "Trump." (Although I'll admit that when I hear someone say "Musk," I imagine I heard "Nazi.")
Marie: Two days ago, I was wondering when White House correspondents would hold Trump's feet to the fire. Yesterday I got the answer: Never. Ever. Not no way.~~~
~~~ Michael Grynbaum of the New York Times: "The Trump administration said on Tuesday that it would start handpicking which media outlets were allowed to participate in the presidential press pool, the small, rotating group of reporters who relay the president's day-to-day activities to the public. The change breaks decades of precedent. It allows the White House to assert more control over which journalists can witness his activities up-close and ask him questions. The White House Correspondents' Association, a 111-year-old group representing journalists who cover the administration, has long determined on its own which reporters would participate in the daily pool.... Tuesday's announcement was the latest in a string of aggressive efforts by the Trump administration to erode the access and influence of major news organizations that cover the White House." Politico's story is here. (Also linked yesterday.)
Justin Baragona of the Independent: "Hours after MSNBC boss Rebecca Kutler officially announced that Joy Reid's show was ending and the longtime host was leaving the network amid a programming overhaul, Reid devoted her final broadcast to instructing her viewers on the ways to resist throughout Donald Trump's presidency, warning them that fascism is 'already here.' The progressive firebrand was also joined by some of her fellow MSNBC hosts, who paid tribute to their departing colleague and likened her cancellation as 'losing a limb,' while Reid lauded network star Rachel Maddow as their 'fearless leader.' Reid's sudden cancellation has sparked backlash among liberals, with some claiming that 'racism' or an attempt to curry favor with Trump factored into the network's decision. Meanwhile, Reid has said she is 'not sorry' for her unapologetically progressive commentary on her show, 'whether it was the Black Lives Matter issues' or going 'hard for immigrants who've done nothing but come to this country like my parents did and try to make a life and defended them.' MAGA pundits and Trump, meanwhile, have relished in the outspoken host's departure."
Rachel Maddow rips the suits at MSNBC for cancelling Joy Reid's & Alex Wagner's shows. (Maddow doesn't name names, but it's apparently that the new president of MSNBC, Rebecca Kutler, is responsible for axing Reid & Wagner.): ~~~
~~~ Anna Betts of the Guardian: "MSNBC has told the majority of the employees who produce Rachel Maddow and Joy Reid's prime-time evening news shows they are being let go as part of the network's programming overhaul with the option to apply for new roles, according to two people directly familiar with the matter.... The Maddow team was let go because of a quirk of how they worked on both Maddow's show and Alex Wagner's show.... On Monday night, Maddow appeared to criticize MSNBC for the recent programming shake-ups and the treatment of its staff during a monologue on her show.... The anchor also called Reid's firing a 'bad mistake' during the monologue, and stated that she did not want to lose Reid as a colleague at MSNBC." MB: "Appeared to criticize"? Nah, she raked management over the coals. And back again. ~~~
~~~ Marcie Jones of Wonkette: "Way back last November, MSNBC (and also CNBC) became no longer affiliated with NBC in any way. The channels' overlord, Comcast, spun them off into a new company called SpinCo, headed by a guy named Mark Lazarus, who said he wanted to make the channel more appealing to Republicans while keeping its appeal to progressives.... Seems pretty obvious that Joe Buildthewall is not going to start watching MSNBC no matter what, even if the hosts were replaced with topless fire-jugglers. Also probably-not-coincidentally, the week of November 18 when the SpinCo spinoff was announced happened to be the very same week Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough crawled down to Mar-a-Lago to try to find "common ground" with the guy they used to freely call fascist, unmoored, mentally unstable, liar, and an insurrectionist, and who had tweet-called them 'low I.Q. Crazy Mika' with a 'bleeding facelift,' and 'Psycho Joe,' respectively. If you were wondering what the backstory was with their 180. The appropriately-named Lazarus would also like to attract younger viewers, because the average viewer of MSNBC is 70.... And now MSNBC is replacing the only two primetime weekday shows on the network solely hosted by women of color.... [Also,] Jonathan Capehart, Katie Phang, and Ayman Mohyeldin are all losing their weekend shows...." ~~~
~~~ Marie: Since they're trying to dump us aged viewers, I guess it doesn't matter what an 80-year-old thinks of their star-studded evening lineup, but the only MSNBC shows I ever watch on purpose are Chris Hayes, Rachel Maddow & Ayman Mohyeldin. I occasionally watch Lawrence O'Donnell's first segment, because he covers important stuff, IMO, but I am annoyed with his constant airs designed to remind me that he's better than I am.
Adam Liptak of the New York Times: "The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted a new trial to Richard Glossip, a death row inmate in Oklahoma whose challenge to his conviction led to an extraordinary concession from the state's attorney general. State lawmakers from both political parties, along with celebrities like Kim Kardashian, had called for clemency or a new trial. Most crucially, Attorney General Gentner Drummond of Oklahoma, a Republican, had asked the justices to throw out Mr. Glossip's 2004 conviction and order a retrial. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the majority, said prosecutors had failed to correct false testimony from their star witness, violating Mr. Glossip's due process rights.... Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Elena Kagan, Brett M. Kavanaugh and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined the majority opinion in the case...." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~
~~~ The decision & dissents are here, via the Court. (Also linked yesterday.)
~~~~~~~~~~
Canada. Ian Austen of the New York Times: Since Donald Trump revealed his plans to cripple Canada with tariffs and has called for the U.S. to annex Canada, Canadians have found a new penchant for flying the nation's maple-leaf flag."
Ukraine, et al. Trump Extorts the Victims. Constant Méheut & Andrew Kramer of the New York Times: "Ukraine has agreed to a deal to turn over the revenue from some of its mineral resources to the United States, a Ukrainian official said on Tuesday, after an intense pressure campaign from ... [Donald] Trump that included insults and threats. The White House did not confirm that an agreement had been struck. The final terms of the deal were unknown, and it was not immediately clear what, if anything, Ukraine would receive in return." (Also linked yesterday.)