When You Don't Get the "Joke"
Jokes depend upon subtext. When you "get" the joke, it's because you know the subtext. Jokes are funny because the subtext both gives the joke its meaning & creates a momentary bond between teller & hearer. For instance, when Hillary Clinton said at the Al Smith dinner last week, "Usually, I charge a lot for speeches like this," most hearers knew this was a joke at her own expense, and referred to speeches she made to Goldman Sachs & other big corporations and for which she was paid seemingly huge sums for what appeared to be, in each case, about an hour's work. The speeches became campaign issues in both the primary and general elections, particularly because Clinton would not release transcripts or tapes of her remarks. Clinton used fewer than ten words to spoof herself and her critics. We knew that backstory, so we got the joke. Ha ha.
Donald Trump told one "joke" at the dinner I just didn't get: "... here she is tonight — in public — trying to pretend she doesn’t hate Catholics.” Why would anybody even think that, much less say it? I wondered. Other than a few rabid StormTrumpers, who "hates Catholics"?
As Amy Davidson of the New Yorker writes, the excuse for that shocking remark was this: "Trump’s joke was about an e-mail in which Jennifer Palmieri, a Clinton aide who herself is Catholic, referred to Catholicism as 'the most socially acceptable politically conservative religion.' The Trumpian translation turned this into evidence that Clinton was a religious bigot — an anti-Catholic in a room full of Catholics." Mighty obscure, and scarcely a trope worthy of an insult directed at Clinton instead of Palmieri, but maybe that was it. It wasn't.
Near the end of the evening, Hillary Clinton, in what I assumed were more-or-less traditional remarks at Al Smith dinners, said,
And when I think about what Al Smith went through it’s important to just reflect how groundbreaking it was for him, a Catholic, to be my party’s nominee for president. Don’t forget – school boards sent home letters with children saying that if Al Smith is elected president you will not be allowed to have or read a Bible. Voters were told that he would annul Protestant marriages.
And I saw a story recently that said people even claimed the Holland Tunnel was a secret passageway to connect Rome and America, to help the Pope rule our country. Those appeals, appeals to fear and division, can cause us to treat each other as the Other. Rhetoric like that makes it harder for us to see each other, to respect each other, to listen to each other. And certainly a lot harder to love our neighbor as ourselves.
Okay, I thought, she was working Al Smith's misfortune into a criticism of Donald Trump and his whole campaign. Even so, it was quite appropriate, in context. But once again, I think I missed the subtext.
Michael Daly of the Daily Beast reminded me: Donald Trump's father Fred "was arrested on Memorial Day in 1927 for participating in a Klu Klux Klan riot in his home borough of Queens. The riot was fueled in part by the prospect that Al Smith might become not just the Catholic governor of New York but the first Catholic president of the United States. 'Americans Assaulted by Roman Catholic Police of New York City' read KKK leaflets that went up in Queens the day after the arrest of Fred Trump and others."
In that tiny newspaper story, published nearly 90 years ago, lies Donald's "Rosebud." Religious, racial, ethnic, cultural and gender animus form the core of his twisted belief system. The views Fred Trump held in the 1920s explain why he and Donald didn't mind discriminating against blacks in their housing developments, even when they were operating under a consent decree; why Donald calls Mexicans rapists & criminals; why Donald thinks Americans of Hispanic descent are unfit to serve in high public office; why Donald would discriminate against Muslim men, women and children; why Donald would stereotype Jewish "folks"; why Donald would profile all people of color as part of his "law & order" platform; why Donald -- and his own sons -- would cultivate white supremacists; why Donald would see nothing wrong with getting into a fight with Pope Francis; why Donald would blithely suggest that his opponent "hates Catholics."
Donald Trump has run a hate campaign because hating others -- all others, no matter who -- is a family tradition. Hillary Clinton remarked on that at the Al Smith dinner. Maybe we didn't get it then, but we know it now.
Reader Comments (7)
But why the Holland Tunnel, which links Manhattan with New Jersey? The tunnel to Queens is the Queens Midtown Tunnel.
@Jerry: The Holland Tunnel opened for traffic in 1927. Al Smith ran for president in 1928. The Queens-Midtown tunnel didn't open till 1940. When Smith ran for president, there was no there there.
The Pope would have to sneak thru (in one direction or the other -- maybe Jersey City could have been Vatican America) via the Holland Tunnel.
Marie
@Jerry Wechsler: Why let a few obvious facts get in the way of some dirty, Trumpian-type politicking?
Robert Slayton (see books/Google books) "Empire Statesman: The Rise and Redemption of Al Smith"
"...Smith’s opponents distributed photos nationwide showing the construction of New York’s Holland Tunnel, claiming this was the secret passageway being built to bring the pope all the way from Rome (the candidate tried to argue that tunnels cost $25 million a mile, that Vatican city was thirty-five hundred miles away, but what was the use?)."
Yeah, come to think of it, I remember when Kennedy was running for president, he also was going to build a tunnel to Rome. Some ridiculous memes never die.
I sort thought when Kennedy didn't build the tunnel -- figuratively or literally -- that was the end of anti-Catholicism in this country.
I guess not.
Marie
Marie: Thank you for this––and yes, we do know it now.
Thanks Marie and everyone.
MAG - I hope you did not intend to imply that I am Trumpian :)
Gee, I'm kind of to the left of Bernie Sanders on many things, though I'm also able to vote for HRC with a certain enthusiasm.
I do not require perfection in my candidates, since I look in the mirror every day - literally and metaphorically - and never find perfection there, either.
I'm grateful for this blog and this community; a small coterie of subversives :)
Margaret Sullivan has a piece in the WAPO that speaks to thoughts that've been on my mind recently. "let's go cold turkey" Yeah! Let's stop giving Trump the headlines. Enough of our braking to view this damn train wreck. Enough of him. The day after the election let's change the subject.
Near the end of Sullivan's piece this particular line was broken below by a blue button insertion that invited one to 'Sign up" "...But the ratings-driven attention to Donald Trump’s every outrageous word and deed should come to a screeching halt.."
I almost clicked it. Count me in!
But, it was simply to receive a WAPO alert.
A joke! Got it!