June 21, 2023
Afternoon Update:
Glenn Thrush & Alan Feuer of the New York Times: "A federal judge [Amy Berman Jackson] on Wednesday sentenced a rioter who savagely assaulted an officer [Michael Fanone] defending the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to more than 12 years in prison, calling him a 'one-man army of hate' whose severe punishment might act as a deterrent to future acts of political violence. The 151-month sentence, handed down at a two-and-a-half-hour hearing in Federal District Court in Washington, was one of the stiffest so far in the Justice Department's sprawling investigation of the Capitol attack. It stemmed from one of the most wrenching episodes of the day, an assault on a District of Columbia police officer with a Taser-like weapon that left him unconscious and unable to return to his duties. The defendant, Daniel Rodriguez, 40, who had previously admitted to driving from California to Washington to do armed battle on behalf of ... Donald J. Trump, expressed some regret for his actions as he asked the judge for leniency. But after receiving his sentence, Mr. Rodriguez smiled and let out a defiant shout of 'Trump won!' before being led out of the room by federal marshals."
Adam Liptak of the New York Times covers Sam Alito's Excellent Vacation (see related stories linked below), and Liptak whacks Sam: Alito claimed "that he did not know of [immensely wealthy Paul] Singer's connection to the cases before the court, including one in which the court issued a 7-to-1 decision in favor of one of Mr. Singer's businesses, with Justice Alito in the majority. But Mr. Singer's connection to the case, Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital, was widely reported." ~~~
~~~ Cheap Wine! Here's something funny: Alito complained about the cheap accommodations. From the ProPublica report, also linked below: writes, "At night, the lodge's chefs served multicourse meals of Alaskan king crab legs or Kobe filet. On the last evening, a member of Alito's group bragged that the wine they were drinking cost $1,000 a bottle, one of the lodge's fishing guides told ProPublica. In his [Wall Street Journal] op-ed, Alito described the lodge as a 'comfortable but rustic facility.' The justice said he does not remember if he was served wine, but if he was, it didn't cost $1,000 a bottle. (Alito also pointed readers to the lodge's website. The lodge has been sold since 2008 and is now a more downscale accommodation.)" ~~~
~~~ What Sam Chooses Not to Get. Philip Bump of the Washington Post: "... this debate over ethical edicts and rulemaking -- however likely to favor ProPublica's interpretation -- is beside the point. The point, instead, is that luxury recreational trips paid for by wealthy benefactors is inherently in conflict with the role of serving on the Supreme Court.... All of us hope to be considered entertaining and popular on our own merits, but those in positions of power should recognize that demonstrations of personal appreciation are not always rooted in beneficence.... The rules and guidelines addressing reporting and recusal by Supreme Court justices should be fail-safes against unscrupulous actors, not challenges to be sidestepped through clever rationalization." MB: There is a pathetic quality to Sam & Clarence, who prefer to believe that wealthy benefactors find them interesting and charming company rather than useful tools in the benefactors' big bags of tricks. You're a tool, Sambo, not a winsome party guest.
~~~~~~~~~~
Alan Feuer, et al., of the New York Times: "The federal judge presiding over the prosecution of ... Donald J. Trump in the classified documents case set an aggressive schedule on Tuesday, ordering a trial to begin as soon as Aug. 14. While the timeline set by the judge, Aileen M. Cannon, is likely to be delayed by extensive pretrial litigation -- including over how to handle classified material -- its brisk pace suggests that she is seeking to avoid any criticism for dragging her feet or for slow-walking the proceeding. In each of four other criminal trials she has overseen that were identified in a New York Times review, she has initially set a relatively quick trial date and later pushed it back. The early moves by Judge Cannon, a relatively inexperienced jurist who was appointed by Mr. Trump in 2020, are being particularly closely watched. She disrupted the documents investigation last year with several rulings favorable to the former president before a conservative appeals court overturned her, saying that she never had legitimate legal authority to intervene." Thanks to Ken W. for the link. A CNBC report is here. (Also linked yesterday.)
Another anti-Trump ad writes itself:
Stefano Dazio & Michael Blood of the AP: "An effort to disbar conservative attorney John Eastman, who devised ways to keep ... Donald Trump in the White House after his defeat in the 2020 election, will begin Tuesday in Los Angeles. Eastman is expected to spend the day testifying before the State Bar of California in a proceeding that could result in him losing his license to practice law in the state. He faces 11 disciplinary charges stemming from his development of a dubious legal strategy that was aimed at helping Trump remain in power by disrupting the counting of state electoral votes. The State Bar's counsel will seek Eastman's disbarment during a hearing before the State Bar Court that's expected to last at least eight days. If the court finds Eastman culpable of the alleged violations it can recommend a punishment such as suspending or revoking his law license. The California Supreme Court makes the final decision." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~
~~~ Update. Brad Reed of the Raw Story: "John Eastman, the attorney who wrote the infamous so-called 'coup memo' that urged former Vice President Mike Pence to reject certified election results on Jan. 6, 2021, got off to a rough start in his disbarment hearing on Tuesday. As reported by NPR investigative reporter Tom Dreisbach, Eastman tried to call as an expert witness a certified public accountant named Joseph Fried who wrote an ebook about the 2020 election in which he cast doubt on the legitimacy of President Joe Biden's win. California State Bar Court Judge Yvette Roland, however, wanted no part of Fried in the hearings, as she noted he lacked any relevant experience in running elections. 'I don't see how Mr. Fried is qualified to be an expert,' she told Eastman."
Eric Lipton of the New York Times: "On a remote site at the edge of the Gulf of Oman, thousands of migrant laborers from Bangladesh, India and Pakistan are at work in 103-degree heat, toiling in shifts from dawn until nightfall to build a new city, a multibillion-dollar project backed by Oman's oil-rich government that has an unusual partner: ... Donald J. Trump.... The Oman deal has taken [Mr. Trump's] financial stake in one of the world's most strategically important and volatile regions to a new level, underscoring how his business and his politics intersect as he runs for president again amid intensifying legal and ethical troubles.... The venture puts Mr. Trump in business with the government of Oman, an ally of the United States with which Mr. Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, cultivated ties while in office and which plays a vital diplomatic role in a volatile region.... Mr. Trump was brought into the deal by a Saudi real estate firm, Dar Al Arkan, which is closely intertwined with the Saudi government. While in office, Mr. Trump developed a tight relationship with Saudi leaders.... Mr. Trump's company, the Trump Organization, has already brought in at least $5 million from the Oman deal. Under its terms, Trump Organization will not put up any money for the development.... The project could also draw scrutiny in the West for its treatment of its migrant workers...." (Also linked yesterday.)
Peter Baker of the New York Times: "President Biden said on Tuesday night that President Xi Jinping of China had been kept in the dark by his own government about the spy balloon that crossed into United States airspace this winter before being shot down by an American fighter jet. At a campaign fund-raiser in California, Mr. Biden set off into what appeared to be an unplanned riff.... 'The reason why Xi Jinping got very upset in terms of when I shot that balloon down with two boxcars full of spy equipment in it is he didn't know it was there,' Mr. Biden told about 130 guests at the big-dollar event in a private Kentfield home. 'No, I'm serious. That's what's a great embarrassment for dictators, when they didn't know what happened.' Other U.S. officials were surprised on Tuesday night that the president would discuss the sensitive information in a public setting, but one official who has been briefed on the intelligence and spoke on condition of anonymity said Mr. Biden's remarks accurately reflected the American government's private assessment." Politico's story is here. ~~~
~~~ Trevor Hunnicutt & Ryan Woo of Reuters: "China hit back on Wednesday after U.S. President Joe Biden referred to President Xi Jinping as a 'dictator', saying the remarks were absurd and a provocation, in an unexpected spat immediately following efforts by both sides to lower tensions. Biden's comments came just a day after top U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken visited Beijing to stabilize bilateral relations that China says are at their lowest point since formal ties were established."
Kevin Breuninger of CNBC: "The identities of the people who guaranteed Rep. George Santos' $500,000 bond in his criminal fraud case will be revealed Thursday at noon ET, a federal judge ordered Tuesday. Judge Joanna Seybert's order in U.S. District Court in Long Island came less than two weeks after the Republican lawmaker's attorney argued that the bail backers' identities should be kept private because of the 'media frenzy' surrounding the case. Other sealed documents in the case, including Seybert's full written order, are also scheduled to be unsealed Thursday, according to a docket entry in Santos' case."
Devlin Barrett & Perry Stein of the Washington Post: "President Biden's son Hunter has reached a tentative agreement with federal prosecutors to plead guilty to two minor tax crimes and admit to the facts of a gun charge under terms that would likely keep him out of jail, according to court papers filed Tuesday. Any proposed plea deal would have to be approved by a federal judge. Both the prosecutors and the defense counsel have requested a court hearing at which Hunter Biden, 53, can enter his plea. The agreement caps an investigation that was opened in 2018 during the Trump administration, and has generated intense interest and criticism since 2020 from Republican politicians who accused the Biden administration of reluctance to pursue the case. The terms of the proposed deal -- negotiated with Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss, a holdover from ... Donald Trump's administration -- are likely to face similar scrutiny." Thanks to Ken W. for the link. The AP's report is here. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~
~~~ Glenn Thrush of the New York Times: "Even after [Delaware's U.S. Attorney David] Weiss [-- appointed by Donald Trump and one of only two Trump U.S. attorney holdovers --] conducted a five-year investigation that yielded evidence to charge [Hunter] Biden only on narrow charges, Republicans, including those who take a dim view of Mr. Trump's handling of classified material after he left office, have accused the White House and Mr. Garland of weaponizing the Justice Department.... House Speaker Kevin McCarthy decried the deal as evidence of a 'two-tiered' system of justice under Mr. Garland that has resulted in the aggressive prosecution of Mr. Trump, and leniency toward the president's allies and family -- although the two cases differ substantially." A Media Matters story by Matt Gertz is here. ~~~
~~~ Chris Hayes of MSNBC has a sensible take on the Hunter Biden plea deal:
~~~ Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade said on MSNBC that the agreed-upon plea deal was an overcharge, more than prosecutors would charge against an "ordinary person." ~~~
~~~ Ryan Reilly of NBC News: "The charges brought against President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden are rarely prosecuted, legal experts say.... The federal gun charge, which makes it unlawful for a drug addict to possess a weapon, is a rarely used statute that is facing legal challenges and has recently been used as a catch-all charge against white supremacists. Like the gun charge, the tax charges are rarely brought against first-time offenders and even more rarely result in jail time, Andrew Weissmann, a former FBI general counsel and NBC News contributor, tweeted Tuesday. 'This is if anything harsh, not lenient,' he wrote. Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti agreed.... 'If anything, Hunter Biden was treated harshly -- those crimes are rarely charged.'" ~~~
~~~ Marie: If you want to put Hunter Biden's crimes in context, this segment of last night's Lawrence O'Donnell's show, in which O'Donnell compares Hunter's misdemeanors with Donald Trump's felonies, is amusing. Trump, of course, thinks Hunter should go to jail, while his own excuse for stealing classified documents and storing them in the ballroom is that he had packed them with his shoes and pants, so he "didn't want to" return them in compliance with a federal subpoena. So he didn't. And that's okay.
Reader Comments (10)
https://democraticundergroung.com/100218025630
President Biden drops the hammer on billionaires.
Who knew there was a tax bracket as low as 8%?
Apparently around a thousand billionaires are aware of it.
** Marie: the site Forrest links locked up my computer and brought up a "warning" message that itself seemed suspect. So link at your own risk. It worked okay for Forrest, so maybe a virus got into my computer, but if it did, it got there via the link.
Update: Oops! See comments below.
Marie,
Change the "g" to a "d" in "underground" and the site works...
Forrest's site worked for me after spelling corrected:
https://democraticunderground.com/100218025630
Sorry, arthritis and humidity don't go well together.
Another thought on those billionaire's taxes. Is spending tons of
money entertaining, flying around, lodging, etc. of some of those
Supreme Court Justices considered a business write off?
Yeah, lets cut back some more on the IRS so things like that will go
unnoticed.
Am I reading this correctly? Given the stellar job Fox's Brett B's attempted with Humpty Dumpty, along with the snarly smack-a-roos from Fatty's "I have the best people in my administration," it looks to me that many in the GOP ––especially those who once served in his administration and perhaps Fox –-are throwing him under that old yellow bus and are moving on. Yet–––there appear to be many of the unwashed who still worship that slippery snake oil salesman and intend to vote for him again––sort of like that old time religion that's good enough and requires no inquiries. Interesting to watch this transition.
And speaking of religion: the story above re: the extremes to which the second-oldest Catholic archdiocese in the US went to coddle the admitted child molester Lawrence Hecker once again sheds light on the darkness that has been interwoven with religious institutions–-the flimsy fabric of sexual retentions rears its ugly head while worshipping the glory of a god.
What, no quotes from 16th C English judges?
My favorite excuse peddled by Sam (Bought and Paid for) Alito as to why he “had to” go on that $100,000 plane ride with a billionaire conniver, is “a seat on the plane would have been vacant otherwise”!
Wow. Now that is some major fucking courtesy there. Can we expect that Hit Man Sam will now be booking seats on commercial flights flying without a full complement of passengers? Next time I’m on a plane and there’s an empty seat, ima call Sammy to get his ass down there toot sweet.
But just for a second, let’s consider the logic of this particular excuse.
He had to go because otherwise there’d be an empty seat.
So what?
Did Singer have to pay more because there was an empty seat? Did the plane require a full passenger load in order to properly fly? Is there an 11th Commandment I’m not familiar with? “Thou shalt not allow empty seats on planes”?
No, no, and no.
This isn’t a “dog ate my homework” excuse, this is a “dog wrote my homework” excuse. Just imagine a plaintiff coming before a court of law trying to make this bullshit fly (so to speak).
“Mr. Alito…tell us why you were on the plane with those crooks?”
“Well, your honor, I had no choice. See? There was an empty seat.”
“What? That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Guilty!”
Not just embarrassing. Insulting. Singer didn’t just hook a big salmon, he reeled in a Supreme Court Justice who later went on to make him billions. And now he’s got him stuffed and hanging on the wall at his fishing lodge.
Empty seat, my ass.
@Akhilleus: And this doesn't count the extra fuel the plane used to haul Sam's fat ass and his luggage to Alaska, the extra meals and drinks and all the flight attendants had to dish up, etc. Then, when he got to Alaska, what about all he consumed there, all the work the kitchen and housework staff had to do to accommodate Sam?
But then, it turns out there was a room at the lodge that was vacant, the chair in the dining room was empty, etc. So again, Sam was doing Singer a favor. So not a stupid excuse at all. Clearly, you are not up on Alitologica. Better start reading more 16th-century English judges.
Alito should have after his name: ...Alito, Arrogant Pr***.
He is a mess. Who died and made him king?? Scalia, maybe? Started with him, anyhow...the process to completely taint the SC. I just can't, with him.
Philip Bump, in a story linked above, describes Pro Publica’s story about outrageous ethical lapses on the part of Samuel Alito as an “interpretation”.
If one were caught breaking into a bank and making off with a bundle would a charge of bank robbery be called an “interpretation”?
WTF?
The guy gets a $100,000 vacation, flown to a swanky lodge in Alaska where “the boys” swig $1,000 bottles of wine and fish for salmon. THEN, the guy who foot the bill for Sam’s trip (and who knows what else?) comes before Alito in his capacity as a Supreme Court Justice, asking for a $2 billion payout. Sam says “No problem”.
How is it an “interpretation” to call that a scandalous ethical problem?
So sick to death of this bending over backwards to not piss off traitors and crooks!
It’s never enough…
Had Hunter Biden received a life sentence for the tax thing, they’d be outraged, demanding the death penalty. And I can’t WAIT to hear them go to the mattresses about the gun charge…these assholes who insist that demented clowns be allowed to carry automatic weapons into daycare centers.
But for a lying traitor, they demand that DoJ prosecutors looking into his many crimes be ejected into space, without a suit.
It’s never enough.