Man Pants!
Gail Collins writes about the strange views & campaign of Delaware's tea party favorite Christine O'Donnell, who is challenging long-time Rep. Mike Castle for the Republican Senate nomination. CW: Collins' column is really worth a read, especially if you want a good look at the kind of candidate Sarah Palin backs against the preferred candidate of her own party.
The Constant Weader is three-for-three with the Times Troll-ops today (buried or lost altogether), so here's what I had to say about candidate O'Donnell:
What is exceptionally creepy about O'Donnell's attack ad against Mike Castle is that she actually copied it, nearly word-for-word except for the appropriate name changes, from one of Sharron Angle's ads against Harry Reid. Imagine having two Sharron Angles in the Senate, one a clone of the other.
Here's O'Donnell's ad attacking Castle:
Here's Angle's ad attacking Reid:
Some Republicans may be glad to hear about O'Donnell's important stance on masturbation. This was also a concern of Justice Scalia's, and he said so in his dissent in Lawrence v. Texas, the landmark case that struck down Texas' sodomy law & has been (as Scalia feared) instrumental in advancing gay rights.
O'Donnell doesn't seem to be much into gay rights, either. Just as O'Donnell's new best friend Sarah Palin called a gay journalist "impotent" and "limp" after he wrote an unfavorable article about her, O'Donnell has taken to questioning Mike Castle's masculinity. Apparently some of O'Donnell's backers have said Castle was gay (oh, my!). O'Donnell herself responded to an FEC Complaint filed against her by the Republican party by saying
You know, these are the kind of cheap, underhanded, un-manly tactics that we've come to expect from Obama's favorite Republican, Mike Castle. You know, I released a statement today, saying Mike this is not a bake-off, get your man-pants on.
Here's the audio. The money quote begins at about 2:50 min. in:
Isn't that just the kind of language we want to hear on the Senate floor? It's great to have true candidates of the people, and not all of us people are well-spoken. But shouldn't we expect more from our candidates? There is something, after all, to be said for decorum.
Update: and once again, Karen Garcia hits it out of the park. See her Comment (#4) here.