Some Right-Wing Lies Are Subtle
This morning, the Hill was running an ad for Newsmax, the right-wing "news" operation founded by Trump BFF Christopher Ruddy. The ad included links to Newsmax stories. I clicked on one of them, a story by Cathy Burke. Her lede: "President Donald Trump's massive tweetstorm after the indictment of Russian nationals and companies for trying to influence the U.S. election might have made it harder to fire special counsel Robert Mueller, Politico reported."
Really? I hadn't seen that story when I looked at Politico's headlines, so I clicked on the linked Politico "report." I don't know who Cathy Burke is. Maybe she's so dumb she thinks the linked "report" is a report. It is not. Rather, it is an opinion piece in Politico Magazine by Renato Mariotti. At the bottom of the opinion piece, Politico identifies Mariotti as "a former federal prosecutor and a Democratic candidate for attorney general of Illinois."
The founding CEO of Politico was Fred Ryan, who was at one time chief-of-staff for Ronald Reagan. He is a Republican. (Oh, & he is now the publisher of the Washington Post. Nice.) I would not call Politico a right-wing news outlet as it has always employed some liberal reporters & commentators, and quite a few Politico reporters do a good job at straight reporting. But it definitely is not the Daily Worker, either.
Most newspapers & many news magazines publish opinion pieces by people who disagree with their own editorial outlook. Unfortunately, the dimwits who read Newsmax are very likely unable to distinguish the difference between "reports" and "opinion pieces." Newsmax not only counts on its readers' ignorance, it amplifies that ignorance by characterizing an opinion piece written by a Democrat as a "report."
The effect on Newsmax readers, whether or not they read Mariotti's opinion piece, will be to suddenly discover that Politico is a leftist rag flogging "Democrat reporters" hostile to Donald Trump. So if these Newsmax readers also had been turning to Politico as a news source, they're more likely to turn off Politico now, or at least to discount Politico reports they don't like as "fake news."
The right wing has a thousand ways of misleading the public. Many are flat-out lies & loopy conspiracy theories. But some are more subtle. And I'll bet the subtle ones are more convincing to confederates than Pizzagate.
Reader Comments (3)
Maybe we need a "Today In Bots" section:
One hour after news broke about the school shooting in Florida last week, Twitter accounts suspected of having links to Russia released hundreds of posts taking up the gun control debate.
The accounts addressed the news with the speed of a cable news network. Some adopted the hashtag #guncontrolnow. Others used #gunreformnow and #Parklandshooting. Earlier on Wednesday, before the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., many of those accounts had been focused on the investigation by the special counsel Robert S. Mueller III into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
“This is pretty typical for them, to hop on breaking news like this,” said Jonathon Morgan, chief executive of New Knowledge, a company that tracks online disinformation campaigns. “The bots focus on anything that is divisive for Americans. Almost systematically.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/19/technology/russian-bots-school-shooting.html
Disinformation has been the rage on the right for decades. Some is deliberate, some could be the result of readers/viewers/consumers of that disinformation being unable to process it as such and simply passing it on as if it were the god's honest truth. Trump is a master at playing this game, with his "People are all saying" and "Everybody knows this" set ups for whatever lie comes next.
But truthful, or at least largely factual information (truth being somewhat separate from fact since those facts have to be considered in proper order and context in order to derive a conclusion that could be called truthful) is also subjected to the right-wing treatment as it is processed and scrubbed through ideological filters and reshaped to fit the desired outcome. So incontrovertible evidence of Russian meddling in the recent election becomes "proof" of how insidious the deep state is and how compromised all non-right-wing media outlets are.
The problem we have today, and it's one that is used on a daily basis by not only the Russians, but the shapers and deliverers of right-wing propaganda, is the speed at which factual information can be perverted into disinformation and the whole spread like wildfire alongside actual lies.
It's like a hyperspeed version of the Telephone Game in which players form a line and something is whispered from one to the other to see how it can be changed by the time it comes back to the first player. Prior to the internet, much political folderol was transmitted in a Telephone Game manner in the form of tidbits of half-heard information or gossip passed on in barber shops, grocery stores, bars, neighbor to neighbor, or friend to friend. But this was a lengthy process and if you happened not to be in the chain or connected to someone in the chain, you missed it entirely.
Those of us old enough to remember the Kennedy assassination can recall how long it took (years, really) for all the crazy backstory and conspiracy stuff to come out. I was 9 in 1963 but I was in high school before I saw the documentary "Rush to Judgment" based on the Mark Lane book on the background to that event. Today, information like that can be had within the hour. It doesn't have to be factual or in any way truthful, but it's there. Today, the game of Telephone (or I suppose, the Game of Facebook) is played at lightning speed. And an opinion piece, written by a crazy person, by the time it comes back around, literally hours later, becomes the considered opinion of some official investigative body.
The whole idea, of both wingers and the Russians, in effect, anyone who traffics in propaganda, is to force everyone to question what they hear and what they see. You think Trump lies? No. He never lies. That's a deep state conspiracy you're seeing. That's liberals and CNN and NBC and the NY Times screwing with "real Americans".
And for low information voters, there's little to no chance that they'll go out of their way to seek out a more authoritative source or multiple authoritative sources.
Mission accomplished, as the Decider liked to say.
For perspective we need to remember that disinformation has been a fact of life for centuries. My own favorite example for home grown disinformation is the success of Hearst, Pulitzer and the Spanish American war.