The Commentariat -- Aug. 31, 2013
The President's Weekly Address:
Dial-a-Senator. Mark Mazzetti & Michael Gordon of the New York Times: "The White House on Saturday moved to shore up domestic and international support for a possible military strike against the Syrian government.... Secretary of State John Kerry, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and other top aides to President Obama scheduled conference calls for Saturday afternoon with members of the United States Senate, where there was deep skepticism in both parties about the prospect of American involvement in another war in the Middle East, even the limited cruise missile strike under consideration.... There was no sign that the White House planned to seek a Congressional vote authorizing the use of force. In addition to Mr. Kerry and Mr. Hagel, both former senators, Adm. James A. Winnefeld Jr., the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, James R. Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, and Susan E. Rice, the president's national security adviser, will participate." ...
I would like to address Obama as a Nobel Peace Prize laureate: Before using force in Syria, it would be good to think about future casualties. Russia is urging you to think twice before making a decision on an operation in Syria. -- Russian President Vladimir Putin, to news agencies
... Michael Falcone of ABC News: "President Obama [Friday] said he has 'not made any decisions' on whether to launch a military strike on Syria, but sought to assure the American public and the international community that if he does, it will be a 'limited, narrow act.... We're not considering any open-ended commitment,' Obama said, adding, 'In no event are we considering any kind of military action that would involve boots on the ground, that would involve a long-term campaign":
Here's the "Government Assessment of the Syrian Government's Use of Chemical Weapons on August 21, 2013." ...
Our intelligence community has carefully reviewed and re-reviewed information regarding this attack. And I will tell you it has done so more than mindful of the Iraq experience. We will not repeat that moment. -- Secretary of State John Kerry, yesterday
... Joby Warrick of the Washington Post: "Unknown to Syrian officials, U.S. spy agencies recorded each step in the alleged attack, from the extensive preparations to the launching of rockets to the after-action assessments by Syrian officials. Those records and intercepts would become the core of the Obama administration's evidentiary case linking the Syrian government to ... the use of outlawed toxins to kill nearly 1,500 civilians, including at least 426 children. Pulling back the curtain on some of the United States' most sensitive collection efforts, the Obama administration released on Friday its long-awaited intelligence assessment [above] of the Aug. 21 event, explaining in rare detail the basis for its claim that Syria was behind the release of deadly gas, the grisly effects of which have been documented in more than 100 amateur videos. The four-page assessment and accompanying map revealed for the first time how communications intercepts and satellite imagery picked up key decisions and actions on the ground." CW: doesn't sound like a Colin Powell smoke-&-mirrors ops to me. ...
... Glenn Thrush of Politico: "Many of the leaks about U.S. strike plans for Syria ... have been authorized as a way for President Obama to signal the limited scope of operations to friends and foes. But a number of leaks have been decidedly unauthorized -- and, according to Obama administration sources, likely emanating from a Pentagon bureaucracy less enthusiastic about the prospect of an attack than, say, the State Department, National Security Council or Obama himself. 'Deeply unhelpful,' was how one West Winger described the drip-drip of doubt. 'They need to shut the f--k up,' said a former administration official." ...
It is clear that the American people are weary of war. However, Assad gassing his own people is an issue of our national security, regional stability and global security. -- House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi
George W Bush couldn't have said it better. -- Digby
... Adam Serwer of NBC News: "... the administration's case that the Assad regime is responsible for the chemical weapons attack is persuasive. Less persuasive however, is the administration's case for a military response.... If Assad was willing to use chemical weapons to maintain his grip on power, it's unclear how 'limited strikes' not aimed at deposing him would dissuade him from doing so again...."
Barton Gellman & Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Post: "U.S. intelligence services carried out 231 offensive cyber-operations in 2011, the leading edge of a clandestine campaign that embraces the Internet as a theater of spying, sabotage and war, according to top-secret documents obtained by The Washington Post. That disclosure, in a classified intelligence budget provided by NSA leaker Edward Snowden, provides new evidence that the Obama administration's growing ranks of cyberwarriors infiltrate and disrupt foreign computer networks. Additionally, under an extensive effort code-named GENIE, U.S. computer specialists break into foreign networks so that they can be put under surreptitious U.S. control." ...
... Mark Hosenball of Reuters: "The British government has asked the New York Times to destroy copies of documents leaked by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden related to the operations of the U.S. spy agency and its British partner, Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ).... The British request, made to Times executive editor Jill Abramson by a senior official at the British Embassy in Washington D.C., was greeted by Abramson with silence, according to the sources." ...
... Robert Booth of the Guardian: "The [British] government took more than three weeks to act on authoritative information about the whereabouts of a collection of secret intelligence data leaked by the whistleblower Edward Snowden, despite now claiming the information risks 'grave damage' to the security of British intelligence and armed forces, the Guardian said on Friday. Guardian News and Media's editor-in-chief, Alan Rusbridger, hit back at Downing Street's claims made in the high court that it 'urgently' needed to access leaked intelligence data seized at Heathrow this month from the partner of Glenn Greenwald...." ...
... Rory Carroll of the Guardian: "Microsoft and Google are to sue the US government to win the right to reveal more information about official requests for user data. The companies announced the lawsuit on Friday, escalating a legal battle over the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (Fisa), the mechanism used by the National Security Agency (NSA) and other US government agencies to gather data about foreign internet users." Here's a statement from Microsoft. ...
... How Irresponsible Is This? David Barrett of the Telegraph: "David Miranda, [Glenn Greenwald's partner,] ... who was detained carrying thousands of British intelligence documents through Heathrow airport was also holding the password to an encrypted file written on a piece of paper, the government has disclosed." CW: I think it was contributor Haley S. who said she watched an interview of Miranda & he didn't appear to be very smart.
In an LOL column, Gail Collins encourages you to run for the U.S. Senate. And, hey, just because you live in, say, Brooklyn & have never been west of Buffalo, (New York, that is) don't think you can't be the Democratic candidate for Idaho. CW: I'm sensing Collins is just trying to encourage Anthony Weiner to consider a run. Aah, he's probably already filled out the paperwork. ...
... Meanwhile, There's Trouble on the Other Side of the Aisle. Jennifer Steinhauer of the New York Times: "Despite their careful efforts, some of the best-known and most influential Republicans in the Senate have been unable to shake threats from the right and have attracted rivals who portray these lawmakers as a central part of the problem in Washington. In Kentucky, Mitch McConnell, the party's Senate leader, is fending off a charismatic and wealthy conservative challenger. In South Carolina, Lindsey Graham, one of the Senate's most reliably conservative voices on foreign policy, is being painted by primary opponents as a veritable clone of President Obama. In Tennessee, Tea Party activists have vowed to take out Lamar Alexander, the veteran senator, former cabinet officer and two-time presidential candidate."
Society Page
Robert Barnes of the Washington Post: "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg will become the first Supreme Court member to conduct a same-sex marriage ceremony Saturday when she officiates at the Washington wedding of Kennedy Center President Michael M. Kaiser. The gala wedding of Kaiser and economist John Roberts at the performing arts center brings together the nation's highest court and the capital's high society and will mark a new milepost in the recognition of same-sex unions."
Allie Jones of the Atlantic: "Bowing to Tea Party pressure, Alabama State Senator Bill Holtzclaw said this week that he thinks The Bluest Eye, Nobel Prize-winning author Toni Morrison's novel about a little black girl who wishes for blue eyes, should be banned in schools.... The Bluest Eye is on the 11th grade reading list for the Common Core, a set of standards that has been adapted by more than 40 states."
Jonathan Landay of McClatchy News: In Egypt, yellow journalism takes over as media outlets make laughable claims in support of the military regime & against the Muslim Brotherhood. "It's succeeding. A mid-August poll measured support for the breakup of the sit-ins at nearly 70 percent of Egypt's 90 million people, reflecting massive popular backing for the coup.... With almost no professional news outlets to present a balanced picture, the relentless vilification of the Brotherhood and its exclusion from politics could help drive members into the ranks of jihadists, risking a return of the Islamist insurgency that bloodied Egypt in the 1990s and bred some of al Qaida's top leaders." Thanks to James S. for the link.
Local News
Craig Gustafson & Mark Walker of the San Diego Union-Tribune: San Diego Mayor Bob Filner left office Friday. Council President Todd Gloria took over as interim mayor.
News Ledes
Los Angeles Times: "Pope Francis has taken a key step in reshuffling the Vatican's bureaucracy by replacing his much-criticized top aide with a career Vatican diplomat who has seen service on three continents. The Vatican said Saturday that Archbishop Pietro Parolin, 58, currently nuncio in Venezuela, will take office as Vatican secretary of state, the pope's prime minister, on Oct. 15, replacing Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, 78."
Guardian: "University of South Florida researchers began work to exhume dozens of graves on Saturday at a former Panhandle reform school, in the hope of identifying the boys buried there and learning how they died." The Tampa Bay Times story is here.
Reader Comments (9)
WTF? We must fire missiles at Syria because "America needs to keep our credibility?" Holey Jeebus! You guyz are gonna have to talk me off the ledge. I am beyond horrified! What are these "smart guys" thinking? That our credibility is worth sending missiles into Syria--which will undoubtedly kill innocent civilians (women and children included)? Or are innocent civilians just "collateral damage," the price of keeping our fuckin' "credibility?"
Assad has already killed thousands of Syrians by means other than chemical weapons, and we hardly blinked. Haley S. says that watching videos of children dying of chemical poisoning is unbearable. I certainly agree. But I have also watched videos of children dying being burned alive by bombs. Is that any less gruesome or unbearable?
We have no business inserting ourselves into this horrible, awful, incomprehensible religious civil war. John Kerry says this is "different" from Iraq. How? The Sunni/Shia civil war is still raging there. Have you noticed, Mr. Kerry? Does Obama think we can somehow give advantage to the Sunnis--among them several Al Qaeda groups and weaken the Shites? We knocked off that evil Sunni, Saddam Hussein, did we not?
Oh please, DO NOT DO THIS! And, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden, shut the fuck up. Talk me down, please!
Our military-cybersecurity bureaucracies have gotten so bloated in their exponential growth during these last decades it's literally out of control. Manning, Wikileaks and Snowden are the most visible examples. I think Obama realizes that these machines have run amok and there's no pulling them in now, so anybody that points out its flaws blowing whistles has to be silenced lest our enemies know we're driving with no headlights. The explosion of amoral contractors muck raking millions of dollars and sucking on Uncle Sam's pork tits has compromised our national security, and thus we find ourselves in absolutely ridiculous scenarios such as this one:
Despite all the money in the world fed to it, our military cannot even establish a secure computer network that houses all of our dirty secrets during our forays across the border. We should reconsider Manning's charges if it's this easy...
Bring on more Snowdens and Mannings, our incompetent 'leaders' deserve it.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/justinesharrock/exclusive-army-admits-to-major-computer-security-flaw
@safari: You raise an important point that has never occurred to me -- that the government, or the Army specifically, was complicit in Manning's crimes. As I recall, a former C.O. had warned that Manning was "unstable" or something & said he shouldn't be given a security clearance. But the Army did it anyway.
A soldier wouldn't have to be deemed unstable, tho, to be tempted -- for whatever reason -- to reveal classified data. Given the low level of education of our soldiers & the stunningly low level of vetting by the government, I don't know why we have any secrets.
In Manning's case, what the government did was to put a kid in a candy store, then punish him for sampling the fudge. It's tantamount to entrapment. It most certainly represents gross incompetence on the Army's part. Yet only Manning pays.
Marie
Re: Firing missiles at Syria. Kate and I are in sync. If the US pulls the trigger, "stupid is as stupid does."
Looks to me we are all on the same page here re: Syria. One of my fears is Assad's motley military missiles hits one of our ships and sinks it. Probably unlikely, but what if? Then we are in full fledged war.
I, too, find the argument for "punishing" the Assad regime for using, if that is indeed the case, chemical weapons certainly understandable as far as protocol, but that protocol doesn't hold justification as far as the U.S. is concerned since we have used same in Vietnam (think Agent Orange) and were complicit with Saddam's use of same when we were once allies–-sort of––during the Iran debacle. Yes, yes, I understand we did not do this on our OWN people, but if you think of the slow poisoning of Americans due to pesticides, oil spills, coal fumes, foul waters, etc. it gives one pause. In wars, the use of chemical weapons is not cricket–-it's cowardly and nasty and it's internationally verboten. Bombing on the other hand is far game and if that method kills more people than those cowardly chemicals, so be it. It is what it is, as the military so often says. So Kate––can't talk you down. I wish I could.
@ Ak: Thank you so much for answering my tech question. I appreciate it.
There must be something they’re not telling us.
Why, for example, would we ever get involved in a civil war where both sides likely wish they were fighting us rather than each other? Or is it that we expect whoever wins this 8th-century-fueled squabble to invite us to open a McDonalds on every street corner once the dust settles? Or is it that we think we’re Jesus—like Boris Karloff in “The Lost Patrol”—and we’ll save the heathens?
I just don’t get it.
I personally think that 99% of people in the U.S. of A. would be
vehemently against getting involved in another civil war, beyond
the one we're still fighting in this country, that is. It's that other
1% I'm not sure about. Does someone have something to gain from
this? Just sayin'.
I remember the brain washing, flag waving, and careful (lie filled) consensus building that took place before the Iraq debacle. It worked pretty well as everyone sat down in front of their TeeVee to watch a little Shock and Awe.
This time is different. the level of anti-war sentiment is much greater and not just in this column. If Obama gives in to the neocons and goes ahead with a strike I believe his personal cost will be much greater than G.W. Bush has experienced. The audience for million dollar speeches from the first black ex-president may shrink considerably.