The Commentariat -- June 29, 2013
Declan Walsh, et al., of the New York Times: " President Obama arrived in South Africa on Friday evening, saying he was bearing a message of 'profound gratitude' to Nelson Mandela, the stricken former leader, and that he would defer to Mr. Mandela's family on whether to visit him. After an eight-hour flight, Air Force One landed at Waterkloof Air Base, just a few miles from the Pretoria hospital where Mr. Mandela has been under intensive care with a serious lung infection for nearly three weeks, as concerns about his health have intensified in recent days despite government assurances that Mr. Mandela's condition had stabilized." ...
... Update: "President Obama will meet privately with members of Nelson Mandela's family Saturday afternoon.... [Obama] still plans to salute Mr. Mandela's life with a visit on Sunday to Robben Island, the prison where the iconic South African leader spent 18 years in a tiny cell."
The President's Weekly Address:
... The transcript is here. ...
... Jonathan Cohn of The New Republic: "The best television coverage of President Obama's climate speech Tuesday wasn't on Fox, CNN, or even MSNBC. It was on the Weather Channel, the only network to carry the address live and to treat it as the major development that it was. Before Obama spoke, the network carried a special, 'The Science Behind Climate Change.' After the speech, the network ran more analysis, including a discussion of ways to reduce carbon emissions." This was all lost on Republicans. ...
... Jeff Goodell in Rolling Stone: "By century's end, rising sea levels will turn [Miami,] the nation's urban fantasyland, into an American Atlantis. But long before the city is completely underwater, chaos will begin."
(Camille Dodero of Gawker has the backstory on the New Yorker cover.)
Ah, Love. Maura Dolan, et al., of the Los Angeles Times: "Same-sex marriages in California resumed Friday when a federal appeals court lifted a hold on a 2010 injunction, sparking jubilation among gays and cries of lawlessness from the supporters of Proposition 8. In a surprise action, a federal appeals court cleared the way, bypassing a normal waiting period and lifting a hold on a trial judge's order that declared Proposition 8 unconstitutional. The news came in a single, legalistic sentence Friday afternoon from the appeals court. 'The stay in the above matter is dissolved immediately,' the three-judge panel wrote. Gov. Jerry Brown told county clerks that they could begin marrying same-sex couples immediately...." ...
... Lisa Leff of the AP: "The lead plaintiffs in the U.S. Supreme Court case that overturned California's same-sex marriage ban tied the knot at San Francisco City Hall on Friday, about an hour after a federal appeals court freed gay couples to obtain marriage licenses for the first time in 4 1/2 years. State Attorney General Kamala Harris presided at the wedding of Kris Perry and Sandy Stier, of Berkeley, as hundreds of supporters looked on and cheered." ...
... Dorothy Wickenden of the New Yorker speaks with Jeff Toobin & Ariel Levy about this week's Supreme Court decisions. Justice Anthony Kennedy is "actually rather extreme in his views; he just has eccentric enthusiasms. Fortunately for the world, I think, one of his enthusiasms is gay rights," Toobin says:
Rick Hertzberg explains what treason is. He gets too het up about Kerry's use of the word "traitor," which I find appropriate. Webster defines traitor as "one who betrays another's trust or is false to an obligation or duty," which is exactly what Snowden did. Webster's second definition is "one who commits treason." But that aside, it's good to remember what "treason" is as others foolishly throw the term around. ...
... Dan Roberts of the Guardian: "A bipartisan group of 26 US senators has written to intelligence chiefs to complain that the administration is relying on a 'secret body of law' to collect massive amounts of data on US citizens. The senators accuse officials of making misleading statements and demand that the director of national intelligence James Clapper answer a series of specific questions on the scale of domestic surveillance as well as the legal justification for it." A facsimile of the letter is here. Good luck reading the names of some of the signers. Looks as if Tom Hanks has become a U.S. Senator.
GOP Intimidates NFL. Sandhya Somashekhar & Lenny Bernstein of the Washington Post: "Earlier this week, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius disclosed that the Obama administration was in talks with the [NFL] to help promote [ObamaCare], which enters a new phase as advocates prepare to begin enrolling millions of Americans in health insurance this fall. On Friday, Republican leaders in the Senate issued a stern warning to sports organizations not to partner with the White House on an issue marked by such 'divisiveness and persistent unpopularity.' ... NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said [in an e-mail], 'We have responded to the letters we received from members of Congress to inform them we currently have no plans to engage in this area and have had no substantive contact with the administration about [the health-care law's] implementation.'"
Karen DeYoung of the Washington Post: "No one will ever be able to say John Kerry didn't try hard enough. Whether he brings the Israelis and Palestinians back to the negotiating table or ultimately fails where so many have failed before him, Kerry seems a man obsessed. Currently on his fifth trip to the region since becoming secretary of state in February, he met Friday afternoon with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, just 15 hours after the two had ended marathon talks that extended well past midnight."
Dana Milbank. This guy "is full of [sh]it." Milbank runs down Darrell's fanciful efforts to bring down President Obama & members of his administration with a series of fake "scandals." Definitely worth a read.
Julia Moskin of the New York Times: "Paula Deen's ... new cookbook hit No. 1 on the best-seller list at Amazon.com, as thousands of fans ... ordered the book months before its October release. But on Friday, its publisher, Random House, said it would not publish the cookbook, and would cancel a five-book contract it signed with Ms. Deen last year.... Its cancellation came on a day when Sears, Kmart and J. C. Penney announced that they would stop selling products, including cookbooks, branded with her name. Since last week, the Food Network, Smithfield Foods, Walmart, Target, Caesars Entertainment, QVC and the pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk have decided to suspend or sever ties with Ms. Deen after her admission in a legal deposition that she had used racist language in the past and allowed racist, sexist, homophobic and anti-Semitic jokes in one of her restaurants."
Gail Collins: Texas Gov. Rick "Perry claimed that, in fighting for abortion rights, [State Senator Wendy] Davis, the daughter of a single mother and herself a single mother at 19 who got herself through college and Harvard Law, 'hasn't learned from her own example.' You will not be stunned to hear that Davis takes a different lesson from her story. 'The Planned Parenthood clinic on Henderson Street in Fort Worth was my sole source of health care for four to five years when I was a young adult,' she said. 'Consider a 19-year-old single mom who wants to be smarter about her family planning so she can go to school and move forward with her career. Had I not had those services available to me, I would not be standing where I am today.'" Collins illuminates what usually get short shrift in this story -- the bill was not just about curtailing abortions; it would have (or will) shut down most of the state's women's health clinics.
Local News
Kevin Murphy of Reuters: "A Kansas judge on Friday issued a temporary injunction on two parts of the state's new anti-abortion law, while upholding the majority of far-reaching measure that goes into effect Monday. Shawnee County District Judge Rebecca Crotty struck down a part of the law that forbids a waiver of the required 24-hour waiting period to be granted based on the woman's mental health. Crotty also struck down a part of the law requiring abortion providers on their websites to vouch for the accuracy and independence of the state's health department material on abortions." ...
... CW: not much of a victory for women and their healthcare providers. Pause, if you will, to think about the Kansas law. The mullahs of Brownbackistan scream freeeedom! for themselves, but they have no compunction about denying free speech rights to medical personnel. They don't want to just probe lady parts; they want to muzzle the professionals who do so honorably as part of their jobs. No matter how charitable you may try to be, it is simply impossible not to see these petty despots as dangerous, sick fucks.
News Ledes
New York Times: " Secretary of State John Kerry extended his trip to Israel a day on Saturday amid speculation that he was closing in on a deal to revive the dormant Israeli-Palestinian peace talks."
AP: Hasan Rouhani, "Iran's president-elect, called his win in national elections this month a vote for change and vowed Saturday to remain committed to his campaign promises of moderation and constructive interaction with the outside world."
Reader Comments (3)
Another post in the maybe I'm missing something department:
There's not much to be said about the Right's rigid anti-abortion stance that has not been said before, but one thought many others have had, which I discovered to my disappointment some years ago was not original with me, is its intellectual laziness and the easy convenience of the moral cover it provides to a party that has no other moral center at all.
To hear them talk, the Right's current fundaments are supposed to be an overweening support for individual rights and a blind faith in an ideal free market, but even a cursory look shows how both beliefs are bathed and nurtured in a noxious stew of racism, self-righteousness and, one would have to conclude, sheer simple-mindedness.
Oddly enough, despite their avowed beliefs, the Right is unwilling to extend their loud support of individual rights to reproductive issues, to voting, or to a union's ability to organize. In short, government should never be intrusive except when it should be used to limit reproductive choice, voting rights or the power of people to associate freely and express themselves. Apparently, in the mind of the Right, no contradictions here.
As for faith in a "market" that seems to represent the closest the Right can imagine to a Just and Wise God--the Deus ex Machina--operating in our imperfect world, it would seem the Right would be pleased to allow market principles--the choices of multitudes of rational men and women--to operate in the reproductive sphere as well. After all, isn't the market supposed to solve all our problems? Can't its magic mechanism produce the right number of the right people without any interference from the state? But no, when it comes to human reproduction the Right wants no choice at all.
The part I'm missing is how a stance adopted and maintained in the face of all its obvious and silly contradictions could satisfy so many. I know it's attractive because it is so easy, but can't be the whole of it, can it?
No, I just don't understand it. I think and think and I still don't know what is the matter with Kansas...and Texas...and Ohio...and Wisconsin...and....maybe coming to a neighborhood hear you and me.
@ Ken Winkes: ah yes the questions that elude comprehension.
Like; How can a judge sit with a pot of fetid stew of a law in her lap and decide that the carrots offend the freedom of speech? But the rotten meat and fungus and etc are perfectly acceptable?
Or; why do people question the security of a country being outsourced to private companies when the government itself has been outsourced to private special interests?
Or; why bother?
@Ken. Although the moral argument has always been the cornerstone of anti-choice groups and the intensity of purpose has been the rule, The groups may have been loud, but generally they weren't organized beyond small pockets in their local areas. The current focus on legislation is relentless. I think we have to answer the question why now? Anti-choice policies are currently widespread, formalized via legislation in the states and creeping into national legislation, and the process is organized. That kind of structure has developed in under a decade. If we look at those most invested in anti-choice policies / legislation, characteristics that define participants are majority male, white and at least middle aged. I think its an expression of desperation around the loss of power and potency, conscience or not. Ironic that their policies may actually hasten the increase of the non-white population. Ignorance or natural selection at work? Who knows. Demographics will eventually prevail.