The Commentariat -- May 2, 2012
My column in today's New York Times eXaminer is here, and for once I mostly agree with Ross Douthat. The NYTX front page is here.
Nicholas Confessore of the New York Times: Wall Streets hates Obama, loves Romney, and they're saying so with their big fat checkbooks -- closed for Obama, open for Willard.
Matthew O'Brien of The Atlantic: Chicago Fed President Charles Evans goes populist & breaks with the Fed orthodoxy. Looks as if somebody listens to Krugman.
Paul Waldman in the American Prospect, commenting on Tagg Romney's extraordinary good fortune -- see yesterday's Commentariat for the link to the NYT story: "... conservatives have become particularly vehement in defending inequality since the meltdown of 2008, insisting that in America, there is no such thing as privilege, money comes only from merit, wealth is a sign of virtue, and if we raise taxes a smidge on those at the top of the income ladder, we're only 'punishing success.' ... When [Tagg] decided this private equity thing looked interesting, there was an escalator waiting, and all he had to do was hop on. That's opportunity."
Not So Supreme. M. J. Lee of Politico: "The Supreme Court's favorability rating has plummeted to a 25-year low, with Americans on both sides of the aisle demonstrating historically negative views of the high court, according to a new poll released Tuesday. Barely more than half of those polled, 52 percent, have a favorable opinion of SCOTUS, a Pew Research Center survey found — the lowest figure in the history of the poll, which began in 1987, and a steep drop from a high of 80 percent in 1994.
Spencer Ackerman in Wired: there's no end in sight of the "war on terrorism"; the U.S. has no idea what the future of Al Qaeda is or even what/who Al Qaeda is. ...
... CW: I don't know if Jonathan Chait is right about this, but I think he might be: "The neoconservatives who dominated the [Bush] administration’s foreign policy believed before the attacks that states, not non-state actors like a band of terrorists, were the thing to focus on.... Democrats believed the Republican focus on state sponsorship was mistaken.... When figures like Romney and McCain were scoffing at Obama promises to capture bin Laden even if it meant violating the sovereignty of our nominal ally Pakistan, they were signaling partisan and ideological fidelity with the Bush administration."
Felicia Sonmez of the Washington Post: Meet Richard Carmona, former Bush surgeon general, actual hero & the Democrat's hope to become U.S. Senator from Arizona, & he might help Obama pull off an upset victory in the state, too. CW: Seriously, you're gonna love this guy.
Nate Silver of the New York Times: Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) "has probably become a modest underdog to retain his seat." His primary opponent is a Sarah Palin-backed Tea Partier. "If Mr. Lugar loses, it should increase Democrats’ odds of picking up the Senate seat in November."
Some of the cast of "The West Wing" reunite for a PSA:
Every Emerging Detail Is a Story. Ed O'Keefe of the Washington Post: "U.S. Secret Service personnel tied to last month’s night of heavy drinking, partying and sexual encounters in Cartagena, Colombia paid 10 of the 12 women they became involved with, officials said. None of the women were found to be connected to terrorist organizations or drug cartels."
Recess! Dana Milbank: "To call this 112th Congress a do-nothing Congress would be an insult — to the real Do-Nothing Congress of 1947-48. That Congress passed 908 laws. To date, this one has passed 106 public laws. Even if they triple that output in the rest of 2012 — not a terribly likely proposition — they will still be in last place going back at least 40 years."
Farhad Manjoo of Slate on the FCC Report on Google's stunning snooping program. Google says "We're sorry; we had no idea." Manjoo says, "Oh yeah?" "When a Street View car encountered an open Wi-Fi network -- that is, a router that was not protected by a password -- it recorded all the digital traffic traveling across that router. As long as the car was within the vicinity, it sucked up a flood of personal data: login names, passwords, the full text of emails, Web histories, details of people's medical conditions, online dating searches, and streaming music and movies."
Matt DeLuca of the Daily Beast on yesterday's May Day demonstratins.
Presidential Race
The Obama campaign will run this add in three swing states:
Philip Rucker of the Washington Post on Willard Romney's day as Not-President. Check out Romney's "explanation" of his 2007 remark that it was wrong for the U.S. to go after bin Laden. Hey, it was Joe Biden's fault. ...
... Steve Kornacki of Salon says Obama's dramatic drop into Afghanistan was a lesson in "how to make Mitt look small." ...
... Fred Kaplan of Slate: "The Republicans have glommed on to a neat rhetorical trick: When Barack Obama does something indisputably admirable or effective, simply pretend that he had nothing to do with it.... Now Mitt Romney, this year's presumptive GOP nominee, is waving off Obama's role in the killing of Osama Bin Laden -- the president’s signal national-security achievement -- by chortling that 'any thinking American would have ordered the exact same thing,' even Jimmy Carter. Two new investigative reports ... thoroughly rebut that notion."
David Bernstein of the Boston Phoenix: "A couple of weeks ago, when the Mitt Romney campaign hired Richard Grenell as foreign-policy spokesperson, I had two immediate thoughts: 1) man, Romney just keeps digging in deeper with the nutty John Bolton foreign-policy crowd; and 2) man, Romney really had to wait until the nomination was completely wrapped up before hiring an openly gay staffer, huh? Well, turns out that even with the Republican nomination sewn up, Romney still couldn't hire a gay staffer. According to Jennifer Rubin, Grenell has quit the campaign because of the controversy stirred up by his gayness....For anyone wondering how Governor Etch-a-Sketch would actually behave in office, on issues that you suspect he campaigns on but doesn't personally believe, this may be instructive. When he gets a little pressure from the conservative base, Romney quickly kowtows to them." ...
... Nia-Malika Henderson & Rachel Weiner of the Washington Post: "Richard Grenell ...stepped down from his post Tuesday, suggesting that the conservative backlash over his sexuality prevented him from being effective in his role." CW: to refresh your memory on what a swell guy Grenell is, read the story. Grenell lost his job for the wrong reasons.
Joel Siegel of ABC News: "Newt Gingrich ends his White House dream today with his political committee facing a mountain of debts -- owing about $4 million to scores of businesses and campaign workers around the country who fear they will never get paid. Campaign watchdogs said the size of Gingrich's debt is extraordinary -- and could have been avoided if the candidate and his team had been more disciplined."
Right Wing World
Glen Johnson of the Boston Globe: "Senator Scott Brown, who won office vowing to be the 41st vote to block President Obama's health care law and who has since voted three times to repeal it, acknowledged Monday that he takes advantage of it to keep his elder daughter on his congressional health insurance plan. 'Of course I do,' the Massachusetts Republican told the Globe. Brown is insuring his daughter Ayla, a professional singer who is 23 years old, under a widely popular provision of the law requiring that family plans cover children up to age 26."
CW: I missed Driftglass's hilarious take on Paul Ryan's (RTP-Wisc.) shocked discovery that Ayn Rand was an atheist. But it's not too late to read it.
News Ledes
Raleigh News & Observer: today's testimony in the John Edwards case focused on Elizabeth Edwards' reactions to his affair with Rielle Hunter.
Guardian: "News Corporation has released a unanimous statement of support for Rupert Murdoch, after its board met to consider the findings of the parliamentary report that concluded the media mogul was "not a fit person" to lead a major global corporation." ...
... BUT. Guardian: "Rupert Murdoch's global media empire is facing a challenge on a new front in the billowing phone-hacking scandal after a powerful US Senate committee opened direct contact with British investigators in an attempt to find out whether News Corporation has broken American laws."
Boston Globe: "Ending a yearlong campaign and a weeklong farewell, former House speaker Newt Gingrich formally ended his presidential candidacy Wednesday in Arlington, Va."
Guardian: "Blind Chinese activist Chen Guangcheng has pleaded for help to let him leave the country with his family, with a US-brokered deal for his future unravelling within hours of his leaving the Beijing embassy where he had taken shelter." ...
... New York Times: "Chen Guangcheng, the blind Chinese dissident who fled house arrest last month in a dramatic escape from security forces, left the American Embassy compound for treatment at a medical facility in Beijing, American officials said on Wednesday in the first public acknowledgment by the United States that it knew of his whereabouts.... Under the arrangement agreed to by the United States, China and Mr. Chen, the lawyer would be relocated to a different part of China from his hometown in Shandong province, where has been under house arrest and where he says his family has been physically attacked, the officials said." ...
... Story has been updated; new lede: "In a series of dramatically conflicting developments on Wednesday, the Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng left American custody under disputed circumstances, and what briefly looked like a deft diplomatic achievement for Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton turned into a potential debacle." ...
... More on the Chen story here from the New York Times.
Washington Post: "At least 11 people were killed in clashes that broke out early Wednesday at demonstrations outside the Egyptian Defense Ministry, the Health Ministry said. The demonstrations evolved from a sit-in convened to decry the way the Egypt’s generals have been ruling the country."
Washington Post: "The Labor Department on Tuesday ordered Wal-Mart to pay $4.8 million in back wages and damages to thousands of employees who were denied overtime charges, the latest in a string of embarrassments for the company over its business practices."
New York Times: "Daw Aung San Suu Kyi took her place in Myanmar's Parliament on Wednesday, reciting the oath of office in a brief ceremony that marked a watershed in national reconciliation after decades of military rule."
New York Times: "Less than two hours after President Obama left Afghanistan airspace on Wednesday, explosions shook the capital and the Interior Ministry said a suicide attacker had exploded a large bomb at the gates of a compound used by foreigners in the east of Kabul, killing seven Afghans."
Reader Comments (3)
Yesterday Victoria made an interesting observation regarding Willard's hazy and perhaps entirely incurious relationship to foreign policy which puts voters in the tenuous position of considering yet another untrustworthy hand at the wheel of state. That previous occupant of the Oval Office who demonstrated such an impervious mind with respect to knowledge, facts, history, and intelligence turned that wheel of state hard to the right like it was fitted with a suicide knob. The forces that drove him were powered by merciless ideology rather than real world intelligence and acute intelligence (pardon me while I take a moment to guffaw loudly at the connection of that phrase with the person of George W. Bush) and the pressures came from all sides.
He fancied himself The Decider but really, he was pushed around by everything and everyone around him from his ambivalent relationship with his old man to the war criminals and self-styled Straussian Neo-Con supermen around him.
Was Bush so hollow at the core that he could have casually ignited two murderous wars (that still call down the thunder), destroyed the economy, put millions out of work while going to the mattresses for the wealthy, and....well, it would take pages to on and on about the failures and weaselly lies of George W. Bush?
But here's the thing. And it's really troublesome.
Bush wasn't a hollow man. He was incurious, he was immune to facts, disinterested in history, and spiteful as could be. But he wasn't without a core. That that core was basically warped to the point of evil is beside the point. He did have values, such as they were.
What are Willard's values? About the only thing one can seriously peg as a constant in his life is "More Money for the Rich."
Oh, he seems to be a good family man and all, but what is at the heart of those presidential good looks and $5,000 suits?
Zippo. At least in terms of the type of qualities one would like to see in a president. Sorry, but blind ambition isn't one of them. Just wanting to be the boss (all the better to fire people) isn't good enough.
There has to be more.
My old friend Marcus Aurelius could sometimes be a bit of an annoying prig, but he was an honest man who knew a lot about rich people and political power. He came from a rich family, had everything handed to him, including the greatest seat of power in the world, that of Emperor of the Roman Empire. But for all that, he was grounded in the real world and he appreciated the values of temperance, moderation, and wisdom.
Here's what he had to say about those, like Willard, who strive purely out of ambition:
"A noble man compares and estimates himself by an idea which is higher than himself; and a mean man, by one lower than himself. The one produces aspiration; the other ambition, which is the way in which a vulgar man aspires."
But to return to Victoria's point, what do you think a Romney presidency would be like? Here we have a guy with no heart, no core, someone who is immeasurably malleable who will be forced by the crazy wing of the GOP (is there another?) to surround himself with ideologues and insane people.
They will push him around like the dorky kid in an inner city playground who shows up in a suit coat wearing a bow tie and a pocket square. They will beat him up, take his milk money and make him say uncle every day of his presidency. He will be forced to do their bidding. He will be the bitch of the GOP hard right for however long he's in office.
Why? Because he has no core beliefs other than money. He flip flops on everything for political gain and like a character in a Twilight Zone episode, as soon as he wins the prize, it will be taken from him and the big boys will run the show.
And what a show it would be. Paul Ryan, Sec'y of the Treasury, Rick Santorum, Sec'y of People's Personal Lives. Eric Cantor, Darrell Issa, the list goes on. They'll all be lining up to get their piece of the action. Ignoble and vulgar men all, surrounding a man without a core.
Oh, one other thing. Marie posted a link to a prospect.org piece about how incensed Tagg Romney is that anyone would think he has made millions because his name is Romney.
Isn't this a little like a guy named Fredo getting pissed when someone attributes his wealth, position, connections, and the support of a whole bunch of very well armed guys just because his dad is Don Corleone?
These people kill me. But we'll be hearing for the next few months what an easy life Barack Obama has had, him being a 'Harvard elite' and all (btw, someone needs to rescue that word from the playbook of imbecilic right-wingers) while Mitt and Tagg and whoever the hell else in that family raking in millions, are posed as average Joes who 'get' what it means to be an average American.
Just like the Corleone family.
I think if we sliced Mitt open we would indeed find a core, but one filled with religious murmurs from the Mormon fathers. He has early on––not so much lately––let evangelicals know that he WOULD let them push him around (unlike Kennedy who had to convince people that he would not let the Vatican push HIM around). He's already given them a theological formula on Jesus which he hopes they will accept. He has attacked Kennedy's absolute separation of church and state using the evangelicals' own slogan: those who think (like Kennedy) that "religion is seen merely as a private affair" are, Romney said, "intent on establishing a new religion in America––the religion of secularism. They are wrong." So, Akilleus, if you are right about the prospect of Romney as the dorky kid everyone pushes around then not only will we be in a land of Ryanism, Cantorism, et. al , but we'll all be having our own come to Jesus moment. Amen, brother, amen.