;)
The Commentariat -- Nov. 22, 2016
... President John F. Kennedy, Report to the American People on Civil Rights, June 11, 1963 ...
... CW: There is a direct line from Kennedy's speech to Trump's election. Trump is the anti-Kennedy; just ask those white supremacists featured in the video near the end of today's Commentariat.
Afternoonish Update:
Sydney Ember of the New York Times: "The strained relationship between Donald J. Trump and The New York Times took an odd path on Tuesday when a planned meeting between the president-elect and the newspaper was abruptly canceled by Mr. Trump and then quickly rescheduled. After a morning of back-and-forth statements and Twitter posts, Mr. Trump arrived at midday for a meeting with Times representatives at the paper's Midtown headquarters. Seated next to the publisher, Arthur Sulzberger Jr., in the paper's Churchill Room, he said he had great respect for the paper but thought its treatment of him had been 'very rough.'" CW: Spoiled schoolchildren aren't this flighty. What a disaster!
Here's the follow-up to Joe Scarborough's scoop-o'the-day, linked below:
... "Never Mind." Michael Shear of the New York Times: "... Donald J. Trump repeatedly said Hillary Clinton's '"lies and deception' rivaled Watergate. He called her 'Crooked Hillary.' His most rabid fans chanted it over and over again at huge campaign rallies: 'Lock her up!' But on Tuesday, Mr. Trump essentially said: 'never mind,' signaling that he does not intend to pursue investigations into his rival's use of a private email server or the financial operations at the Clinton family's global foundation. In an appearance on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' program, Kellyanne Conway, the former Trump campaign manager and a senior adviser to his transition, said ... [Trump] wanted to 'move beyond the issues of the campaign' and confirmed that Mr. Trump did not want his promised Clinton investigations to take place." -- CW ...
... CW: Look for sales of sweaty, used, extra-large-sized "Lock Her Up!" T-shirts on e-bay. P.S. to Obama: You might want to issue a quiet blanket pardon to Clinton anyway. Not that Trump would ever lie to gain an advantage.
David I-Told-You-Trump-Was-a-Crook Fahrenthold of the Washington Post: "Donald Trump's charitable foundation has admitted to the IRS that it violated a legal prohibition against 'self-dealing,' which bars nonprofit leaders from using their charity's money to help themselves, their businesses or their families. That admission was contained in the Donald J. Trump Foundation's IRS tax filings for 2015, which were recently posted online at the nonprofit-tracking site GuideStar. A GuideStar spokesman said the forms were uploaded by the Trump Foundation's law firm, Morgan, Lewis and Bockius.... Such violations can carry penalties including excise taxes, and the charity leaders can be required to repay money that the charity spent on their behalf. During the presidential campaign, The Washington Post reported on several instances in which Trump appeared to use the Trump Foundation's money to buy items for himself or to help one of his for-profit businesses. But the new Trump Foundation tax filings provided little detail so it was unclear if these admissions were connected to the instances reported in The Post." -- CW
*****
Michael Shear of the New York Times: "... Donald J. Trump released a two-and-a-half minute infomercial-style video on Monday that largely steered clear of his most inflammatory campaign promises to deport immigrants, track Muslims and repeal President Obama's health law. Instead, Mr. Trump offered what he called an update on his transition, which he said was working 'very smoothly, efficiently and effectively.' Reading from a script and looking into the camera, Mr. Trump vowed to focus on creating jobs, reducing regulations and combating corruption once in office." -- CW ...
... Nicky Woolf, et al., of the Guardian: Trump "said [in the video] that he was going to issue a note of intent to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, calling it 'a potential disaster for our country'. Instead he said he would 'negotiate fair bilateral trade deals that bring jobs and industry back'. Hours before Trump's announcement, Japan's prime minister, Shinzo Abe, warned that the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) would be 'meaningless' without US participation.... be, a vocal supporter of the 12-nation agreement, appears to have failed in his recent attempts to coax Trump out of his 'America first', protectionism." -- CW
Incoming POTUS Connects with Major Media Honchos. Emily Smith & Daniel Halper of the New York Post: "Donald Trump scolded media big shots during an off-the-record Trump Tower sitdown on Monday, sources told The Post. 'It was like a f[uck]ing firing squad,' one source said of the encounter. 'Trump started with [CNN chief] Jeff Zucker and said "I hate your network, everyone at CNN is a liar and you should be ashamed,'" the source said. 'The meeting was a total disaster. The TV execs and anchors went in there thinking they would be discussing the access they would get to the Trump administration, but instead they got a Trump-style dressing down,' the source added. A second source confirmed the fireworks. 'The meeting took place in a big board room and there were about 30 or 40 people, including the big news anchors from all the networks,' the other source said.... 'Trump didn't say [NBC reporter] Katy Tur by name, but talked about an NBC female correspondent who got it wrong, then he referred to a horrible network correspondent who cried when Hillary lost who hosted a debate -- which was Martha Raddatz who was also in the room.'... Trump spokeswoman Kellyanne Conway told reporters the gathering went well." -- CW ...
... Hadas Gold of Politico: "The source who spoke with Politico characterized the meeting as less intense, and said the discussion included Trump expressing the possibility of a 'reset' of the tumultuous relationship between ... [Trump] and the media and that all he wants is 'fairness.'... He ... was effusive in his praise of President Barack Obama, the source added, telling the media assembled that after their White House meeting the two have spoken by phone at least twice.... Conway later on Monday hit back at the New York Post report. 'He did not explode in anger,' she said." -- CW ...
... Michael Grynbaum & Sydney Ember of the New York Times: "... after details of Mr. Trump's hectoring leaked on Monday in The New York Post, it seemed the meeting was being used as a political prop, especially after Trump-friendly news outlets trumpeted the session as a take-no-prisoners move by a brave president-elect. 'Trump Slams Media Elite, Face to Face,' blared the Drudge Report. 'Trump Eats Press,' wrote Breitbart News." -- CW ...
... Paul Farhi of the Washington Post: "... he repeatedly used the words 'unfair' and 'dishonest' to describe the coverage, participants said.... The participants variously described Trump as 'combative,' 'proud,' and 'dismissive' toward the news organizations present. He also shrugged off the need for a constant pool covering him, the people said, though he did not delve into specifics. Trump has repeatedly shirked his pool, upending a long-standing tradition of the president and president-elect." -- CW ...
... CW: In other words, this was a warning to the media: Trump is the top dog, and if they don't praise him "fairly," they'll pay. BTW, the media should get over any notion the Trump administration will abide by the Federal Records Act, or fill FOIA requests. Trump's notion of federal record-keeping will be a scrapbook filled with rave reviews from Breitbart "News." ...
... Update: Reports on Trump's dressing-down of electronic media bigwigs all noted that he would meet with New York Times editors and reporters today. Not any more. Kyle Balluck of the Hill: "... Donald Trump said early Tuesday morning that he cancelled a meeting with the 'failing' New York Times. Trump said in a tweet that the meeting's 'terms and conditions' were changed at the last moment. 'Not nice,' he added.... 'Perhaps a new meeting will be set up with the @nytimes. In the meantime they continue to cover me inaccurately and with a nasty tone!' [Trump tweeted later.]... The Times ... released a statement saying it did not change any of the meeting's terms, and only refused to agree to Trump's request to squash an on-the-record sessions." ...
... CW: That is, the "last-moment change" was Trump's, not the Times'. But this is not a complete lie on Trump's part; he used the passive voice -- "the terms and conditions of the meeting were changed at the last moment. Not nice." -- to strongly imply it was the Times, not he, who changed the terms. Are we supposed to see this new "Art of the Lie" as an improvement over his usual bald-faced lies?
Annie Gowen of the Washington Post: "Donald Trump's company has partnered with Indian developers to create more business ventures than in any other foreign nation or territory, a Washington Post analysis of financial filings shows. In doing so, the Trump Organization has forged deals with leading moguls here, and with a billionaire politician. One Trump-branded project is under investigation for land-acquisition irregularities, among several projects in India now prompting conflict-of-interest concerns.... [Trump] is involved in at least 16 partnerships or corporations here. Those business interests -- and the financial relationship with a leading member of the governing party -- will be a significant backdrop to Trump administration policy toward the world's most populous democracy -- and toward its warily hostile neighbor, Pakistan." -- CW ...
... "The Greatest Grift of All." Paul Waldman explains how Trump & the Family Unit will use the presidency to really strike it rich. It all sounds "like a modern version of the way medieval kings would expect all the landowners to come to the castle bearing trunks of gold to pay proper respect, lest they incur his wrath. And you may be wondering: Does Trump really think he can get away with this? Yes he does.... If people are saying it's unprecedented and inappropriate and vulgar for him to be using the White House to enrich himself, is Donald Trump going to care? Why should he? He got away with everything else, didn't he?" See also Lisa's comment at the top of today's thread. -- CW ...
... AND Trump started his foreign ops grift immediately ...
Josh Marshall & Catherine Thompson of TPM: "For a number of years, Trump and his Argentine partners have been trying to build a major office building in Buenos Aires. The project has been held up by a series of complications tied to financing, importation of building materials and various permitting requirements. According to a report out of Argentina, when Argentine President Mauricio Macri called ... Trump to congratulate him on his election, Trump asked Macri to deal with the permitting issues that are currently holding up the project. This comes from one of Argentina's most prominent journalists, Jorge Lanata, in a recent TV appearance." Trump & the Argentine Embassy have both denied Trump & Macri discussed his Buernos Aires project. -- CW ...
... CW: We'll never know for certain, since Trump failed to follow protocol, or even contact the State Department about taking calls from world leaders until a number of days after the election, so no one provided a readout of the Trump-Macri conversation. In general, whenever Trump mentions another country, he's quick to boast about his business interests there. So at the very least, Trump reminded Macri that he had a project pending in Buenos Aires. AND, as Ben Walsh, et al., of the HuffPost report, "Macri's father, Franco, was a construction magnate and worked with Trump in New York in the 1980s. Macri ... told Japanese newspaper Asahi Shimbun on Monday that Trump's daughter (presumably Ivanka) was also on his congratulatory call." Given all that, we'd be silly to think Trump did not mention the Buenos Aires project to Macri. Of course he (or Ivanka) did. I'll bet Trump & his partners get those permits pronto. ...
... In a follow-up post, Josh Marshall notes that President Macri also has denied discussing the permitting issue with Trump. "Macri's denial is important. But we should bear in mind that Macri has about as much interest in confirming such a conversation as Trump himself does." To give you a better idea of what people who know Trump think of him, Marshall adds this aside:
As TPM's Catherine Thompson noted back in August, Macri's father Franco had dealings with Trump in the early 1980s when the elder Macri (a construction tycoon) tried to break into the New York real estate business. Indeed, things got so intense between Franco Macri and Trump that when Mauricio (the current President) was kidnapped and thrown into a coffin by unknown kidnappers, Franco Macri at first thought Trump was responsible for the kidnapping.... To be clear, the kidnappers were later captured and there is no evidence whatsoever that Trump was involved in anyway. (Emphasis added.)
... THEN, there's this ...
... Danny Hakim & Eric Lipton of the New York Times: "When ... Donald J. Trump met with the British politician Nigel Farage ... shortly after the election..., he encouraged Mr. Farage and his entourage to oppose the kind of offshore wind farms that Mr. Trump believes will mar the pristine view from one of his two Scottish golf courses, according to one person present. The meeting ... raises new questions about Mr. Trump's willingness to use the power of the presidency to advance his business interests.... 'He did not say he hated wind farms as a concept; he just did not like them spoiling the views,' said Andy Wigmore, the media consultant who was present at the meeting.... [Wigmore said] Mr. Trump 'did suggest that we should campaign on it' and 'spurred us in and we will be going for it.'" Trump's spokesperson Hope Hicks first denied the conversation took place; then, when presented with Wigmore's assertions, "declined repeated requests for comment." -- CW ...
... The Audacity of Spin. Laurel Raymond of Think Progress: "Kellyanne Conway, a Senior Advisor to ... Trump, said people should focus less on Trump's conflict-of-interest and more on the 'sacrifice' he's making to his business career by becoming president." -- CW ...
... Adam Liptak of the New York Times reports on the Emoluments Clause of the Constitution. A useful read, since we're going to be hearing more about this. ...
... Harper Neidig of the Hill: "A Republican congressman is criticizing Donald Trump over apparent conflicts of interest stemming from the president-elect's business empire, likening them to accusations made against Hillary Clinton on the campaign trail. 'You rightly criticized Hillary for Clinton Foundation,' wrote Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) on Twitter Monday night. 'If you have contracts w/foreign govts, it's certainly a big deal, too.'... The message was in response to a tweet from Trump complaining about coverage of his business ties in foreign countries and how they could present a conflict of interest while he's in office. 'Prior to the election it was well known that I have interests in properties all over the world,' Trump tweeted. 'Only the crooked media makes this a big deal!'" -- CW ...
... Margaret Hartmann: With that tweet, "Trump has confirmed that he doesn't actually care about creating a clear line between his business and the presidency -- which means that there will likely be no line.... As New York's Eric Levitz put it, 'The only constraints on Trump's freedom to leverage his public power for private profit is political disapproval and his own sense of shame.' And suffice it to say the man who presented himself as a major donor to a charity for children with AIDS, though he hadn't given a dime, doesn't have a lot of shame." -- CW ...
... ** Josh Marshall (Nov. 21): "At a minimum, we use this construct ['conflict of interest'] on the assumption that people are acting in good faith and not advancing their private interests with the powers of their office.... The concept simply doesn't apply well when you are talking is a public official who is by design using their public office for profit. Everything we've seen from ... Trump so far suggests this all comes so naturally to him that at some level he doesn't even see anything wrong with it. Indeed, this shouldn't be surprising since it matches with his entire career, in which he has used every angle on offer - publicity, stardom, connections with government officials, etc. - to make money or as tools he can leverage to make money for his private businesses." -- CW
Road to the West Wing Is a Heritage Trail. Katie Glueck of Politico: "A year ago, the political arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation dismissed Donald Trump as a big-government enthusiast and left-wing sympathizer. Now, the Heritage Foundation has emerged as one of the most influential forces shaping ... Donald Trump's transition team, embedding the veteran Washington group into the operation of a candidate who ran loudly against the Beltway." -- CW
Harper Neidig: "MSNBC's 'Morning Joe' is reporting that ... Donald Trump will not pursue investigations intoHillary Clinton's use of a private e-mail server or her family's charity foundation. 'Source tells @Morning_Joe @realDonaldTrump won't pursue investigations into @HillaryClinton for private email server use/Clinton Foundation, Joe Scarborough's show tweeted Tuesday morning." CW:: Don't give up, Hillary haters; you still have Jason Chaffetz! ...
... Oh, And Judicial Watch. Josh Gerstein of Politico: "Lawyers for Hillary Clinton are opposing a conservative group's demand that she provide more details about the creation of the private server that hosted her email account while she was secretary of state. Last month, Clinton answered written questions that a federal judge authorized Judicial Watch to ask in connection with a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit related to her email set-up." Judicial Watch didn't like her answers. -- CW
New York Times Editors: "Mr. Trump raged on Twitter, falsely accusing the cast [of 'Hamilton'] of harassing Mr. Pence and demanding an apology. Mr. Trump's itchy Twitter finger, however, fell silent when 200 or so white nationalists of the 'alt-right' movement gathered on Saturday ... a few blocks from the White House -- to celebrate his election with a very public coming-out party filled with racist and anti-Semitic filth.... Given the danger of violence and bigotry these groups pose, why would Mr. Trump, who was so offended by the 'Hamilton' cast's plea for tolerance, remain silent?" CW: Obviously because Trump's heart is with his white supremacist supporters. He is what they are, if somewhat more circumspect -- so far.
William Cohen & Gary Hart in a New York Times op-ed: "Predictably, much of the focus [on Trump's "plans"] is on the domestic changes his election may bring. But serious foreign policy experts and institutions must process the implications of his victory and the Brexit vote and place them within the lessons of the post-World War II world." -- CW ...
... SO, there's this:
... Trump Already Needling Conservative British Government. Nicky Woolf & Jessica Elgot of the Guardian: "... Donald Trump, has suggested that the Ukip leader, Nigel Farage, should be the UK's ambassador to the US. 'Many people would like to see [@Nigel_Farage] represent Great Britain as their Ambassador to the United States,' Trump tweeted on Monday evening. 'He would do a great job!'... But a Downing Street spokesman said: 'There is no vacancy. We already have an excellent ambassador to the US.'... It is unprecedented for an incoming US president to ask a world leader to appoint an opposing party leader as ambassador, and the statement puts [PM Theresa] May in a difficult position.... Sir Christopher Meyer, the former British ambassador to Washington, said [in a tweet]..., 'UK ambassador in DC exists to defend UK interests in US, not US interests in UK.... Can't have foreign presidents deciding who our [ambassador] should be.'" CW: And Queen Elizabeth has to be gracious to our Dictator-in-Waiting.
Chris Isidore, et al., of CNN: "Protecting ... Donald Trump and his family is costing New York City more than $1 million a day, according to three city officials. And those costs won't necessarily drop significantly once he moves to the White House. That's because Melania Trump and their 10-year old son Barron expect to stay at their home at Trump Tower in midtown Manhattan, at least until the end of the school year. And Donald Trump has indicated he plans to return home regularly, especially while they're still here. Adding to the expense is the cost of police assigned to Trump's adult children and his grandchildren, who are also receiving Secret Service protection, John Miller, NYPD's deputy commissioner of intelligence & counterterrorism, told WCBS Monday. All of them live in the city, and all are entitled to receive Secret Service protection." -- CW
Tom LoBianco of CNN: "The Federal Election Commission is asking the campaign of Donald Trump to correct more than 1,000 errors in its latest financial filing. The FEC determined that the Trump campaign accepted close to 1,100 donations, which amounted to roughly $1.3 million, that violated one of a handful of campaign finance laws. In some cases, the Trump campaign accepted donations from groups that had not registered properly with the FEC. But in the majority, donors blew right past legal donation limits, the commission wrote in a letter to the Trump campaign sent Monday." -- CW
Bernie Finally Reads Donald's "Infrastructure Plan," Discovers It's a Scam. Yousef Saba of Politico: "Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders blasted ... Donald Trump's proposed infrastructure plan on Monday, calling it a 'scam' and 'corporate welfare.' 'Trump's plan to repair our infrastructure is a scam that gives massive tax breaks to large companies & billionaires,' Sanders wrote on Twitter, embedding a link to an article he published on Medium.com. 'Trump would allow corporations that have stashed their profits overseas to pay just a fraction of what the companies owe in federal taxes,' Sanders continued in another tweet, adding, 'And then he would allow the companies to 'invest' in infrastructure projects in exchange for even more tax breaks.'" -- CW
Jeet Heer of the New Republic: "It's been less than two weeks since [Donald Trump] won the election, and already he's entangled himself in a series of conflicts of interest that could easily rise to the level of a constitutional crisis.... But the solutions being bandied about all have a fatal hurdle in common: They'd require a Republican Congress to take a stand against Trump.... Democrats will have to mount a sustained campaign to expose Trump's corruption in a way they failed to do throughout the 2016 campaign.... Creating wedges that separate Trump from his base is one of the Democrats' most urgent tasks going forward, and a fresh argument about corruption is the way forward.... What the opposition needs is a strong, ongoing argument that his corruption is integrally linked to policies that go against ordinary people." ...
... CW: Heer's argument is similar to one Steve M. made last week: that Clinton's campaign was so busy painting Trump as a bad person, they forgot to point out he would be a bad president. ...
... OR Democrats could follow Tulsi Gabbard's lead. Jessie Hellmann of the Hill: "Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) vowed to work with Donald Trump on the issues that matter to the American people, following a meeting between the two Monday at Trump Tower.... Gabbard and Trump met in New York City to discuss U.S. policy in Syria, she said in a statement, though some have speculated she is under consideration to be the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations." She supported Bernie Sanders in the primary. -- CW ...
... More Beknighted Democrats Emerge. Kyle Cheney of Politico: "At least a half-dozen Democratic electors have signed onto an attempt to block Donald Trump from winning an Electoral College majority, an effort designed not only to deny Trump the presidency but also to undermine the legitimacy of the institution. The presidential electors, mostly former Bernie Sanders supporters who hail from Washington state and Colorado, are now lobbying their Republican counterparts in other states to reject their oaths -- and in some cases, state law -- to vote against Trump when the Electoral College meets on Dec. 19. Even the most optimistic among the Democratic electors acknowledges they're unlikely to convince the necessary 37 Republican electors to reject Trump -- the number they'd likely need to deny him the presidency and send the final decision to the House of Representatives. And even if they do, the Republican-run House might simply elect Trump anyway. But the Democratic electors are convinced that even in defeat, their efforts would erode confidence in the Electoral College and fuel efforts to eliminate it.... The group is also contemplating encouraging Democratic electors to oppose Hillary Clinton and partner with Republicans in support of a consensus pick like Mitt Romney or John Kasich." -- CW ...
... Hamilton! Peter Beinart of the Atlantic doesn't see the Electoral College as those Democratic electors do: "Americans say they revere democracy. Yet they also revere those rights -- freedom of speech, freedom of religion, the right to bear arms -- that the government's least democratic institutions protect. Americans rarely contemplate these contradictions. If they did, they might be more open to preventing Donald Trump from becoming the next president, the kind of democratic catastrophe that the Constitution, and the Electoral College in particular, were in part designed to prevent.... It is 'desirable,' Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist 68, 'that the sense of the people should operate in the choice of' president. But is 'equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station.' These ... electors would be 'most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations.' And because of their discernment ... 'the office of President will never fall to the lot of any man who is not in an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications.'... The framers were particularly afraid of the people choosing a demagogue." -- CW ...
... ** The USA Is Not a Democracy. Ed Kilgore: "... the overall partisan imbalance between the party that keeps winning the presidential popular vote and the party that keeps winning everything else is entirely the product of a system that systematically violates the supposedly sacrosanct principle of voter equality. As right-wing talk-radio types love to insist, the United States is a republic, not a democracy. And that has created an abiding problem for the Democratic Party." CW: BTW, Clinton's lead in the popular vote is now more than 1.6MM & counting. AND, per the Cook Report, Clinton is on track to garner some 2.5MM more votes than Trump, putting her about even, at 65MM votes, with Obama 2012. Democrats should not whine about it; rather, they should tout it every time Trump claims he has a "mandate" for one of his draconian plans.
The Bavarian Prince Who Sealed Our Fate. AP: "A handwritten letter has been found in a German archive in which ... Donald Trump's grandfather unsuccessfully fought his expulsion from the country for failing to perform mandatory military service. Bild newspaper on Monday printed the 1905 letter located by an historian, in which Friedrich Trump wrote Bavarian Prince Luitpold begging the 'well-loved, noble, wise and just' leader not to deport him. Luitpold rejected the 'most subservient request.' Trump's grandfather was born in Kallstadt, then part of Bavaria, and immigrated to the U.S. as a teenager without performing his military service. It was after he'd made his fortune there and tried to resettle in Germany that he was ordered expelled...." CW: So draft-dodging for profit is a family tradition.
Helaine Olen of Slate: "It was just this spring that millions of Americans learned they were in for a big raise courtesy of the Obama administration's long-awaited updating of the federal rules for overtime pay. They can enjoy it while it lasts -- if they even receive it at all. It's looking increasingly likely that a rollback of the overtime rules are squarely in the sites of congressional Republicans and the incoming Trump administration." Olen explains how the rule works & why the Obama administration was remiss in not implementing it sooner. ...
... CW: This is one more GOP dirty trick that Democrats should advertise, but -- other than a few impassioned floor speeches by Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, et al., I doubt the party will bother. Democrats lose not because their policies are bad but because their strategies are. The voting public will have no idea what hit them because Democrats won't tell them.
Here's a video of Richard Spencer's speech at the alt-right convention in Washington, D.C. At the top, many in the audience raise their arms in Nazi salutes when Spencer calls on them to "Hail Trump":
KDKA Pittsburgh: "According to a new study from Stanford University, about 82% of middle schoolers couldn't distinguish between an ad labeled 'sponsored content' and a real news story on a website. That percentage is based on 7,804 students from middle school through college. Many students judged the credibility of news tweets based on how much detail they contained or whether a large photo was attached, rather than on the source." ...
... CW: If you wonder how Americans could vote for Trump, therein lies your answer. Partly because of a deficient public education system, adults aren't much more savvy than those clueless kids. I have no idea how I learned that the NYT, for all its lapses, is more reliably accurate than conspiracy nutjob Alex Jones, but it is a fundamental something you & I know that half of Americans don't.
Beyond the Beltway
Bull Connor Methods Come to North Dakota. Julia Wong of the Guardian: "Twenty-six people were hospitalized and more than 300 injured after North Dakota law enforcement officers trained water cannons, teargas, and other 'less-than-lethal' weapons on unarmed activists protesting against the Dakota Access pipeline in below-freezing weather on Sunday night, according to a group of medical professionals supporting the anti-pipeline movement. The Standing Rock Medic & Healer Council said that injuries from the 'mass casualty incident' included multiple bone fractures from projectiles fired by police, a man with internal bleeding from a rubber bullet injury, a man who suffered a grand mal seizure, and a woman who was struck in the face with a rubber bullet and whose vision was compromised. The majority of the patients suffered hypothermia, a result of being soaked by water cannons, the group said. Civil rights groups are decrying the use of water cannons in below-freezing weather." ...
... CW: I'm just speculating, but I suspect that the majority of the injured were Sioux. For those of you clinging to the hope that the U.S. cannot become like Nazi Germany, there's this from the report:
The use of water cannons against protesters invokes images of African Americans being bombarded with fire hoses during the civil rights movement, but the crowd control tactic was developed in Germany in the 1930s, according to the ACLU. ...
... Alleen Brown of the Intercept has more on police attacks on protesters. CW: President Obama should get the National Guard, under his control, to disperse local "law enforcement."
Carrying Jobs to New Castle. David Leonhardt of the New York Times: Delaware's Democratic governor, Jack Markell, has been working with some success to keep & create jobs for the state's blue-collar workers. One way he's done so is through innovative programs at New Castle's William Penn High. CW: It all sounds fine, but if Penn's grads can't pass the U.S. citizenship test, then Markell is not doing his whole job. If I were the Education Goddess, I would give students who couldn't pass the test provisional diplomas, and I'd keep night school classes open year-round for those who wanted to clean up their ignorant-citizen status.
Voters should be able to choose their representatives, not the other way around. -- Wisconsin Assembly Minority Leader Peter Barca, Monday ...
... Todd Richmond of the AP: "Federal judges struck down Wisconsin's Republican-drawn legislative districts as unconstitutional on Monday, marking a victory for minority Democrats that could force the Legislature to redraw the maps. The three-judge panel didn't order any immediate changes to district boundaries, instead saying they would give state attorneys and the voters who challenged the old maps 45 days to offer suggestions. State lawyers plan to appeal the 2-1 ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court, but for now the decision offers hope for Democrats who have been in the minority for six years and lost more ground in this month's elections.... The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to come up with a legal standard for deciding when redistricting becomes unconstitutional gerrymandering." -- CW
Mark Berman of the Washington Post: "Police in San Antonio said Monday that they had arrested a man wanted in the ambush killing of an officer fatally shot a day earlier. San Antonio Police Chief William McManus said during a briefing that a SWAT team had arrested Otis Tyrone McCain. According to McManus, McCain was arrested without incident following a sprawling manhunt sparked by the killing of Detective Benjamin Marconi, who was slain while writing a traffic ticket in front of police headquarters on Sunday morning." -- CW
Share Article
Reader Comments (21)
Interesting question I just saw on a forum discussing Trump's business interests around the world: "Won’t all those buildings around the world with capital “T” present tempting but indefensible targets? Will the Marines guard all of Trump’s properties?" It seems we are going to have to pay for his family to live in NY and his children to fly around in Trump planes with Secret Service protection, so why not protect his name abroad too? His children and his brand could be a big vulnerability. What would he do if a property were attacked? People would be afraid to stay there, which could mean loss of income. All kinds of ways his business interests could complicate his Presidential actions. Would he expect our military to protect his brand for national security?
Trump is refusing the presidential salary. At 400k that might impact his ability to avoid all taxes. In other words it doesn't benefit the bottom line.
Jeanne,
Yesterday you posted that there were no media outlets publishing the facts about Trump. Give Think Progress and Talking Points Memo a try. I think they do a great job and I'd guess Marie does too; she frequently posts their work. I've become addicted to their twitter where I've been introduced to other like journalists. They may not be able to change the course of things, but you won't feel quite so alone if you follow them.
Lisa's comments make your head spin––hadn't thought about all those Trump logos being a possible target. This whole fiasco is becoming so complicated and disruptive –- its potential for real danger needs to be addressed BEFORE this man becomes President. Of course, if after we have impeachable acts then we dump Trump and endure Pence.
And I worry about Kellyanne whose spinning for her Rumplestillskin must take a toll. Lying and trying so hard to put a happy face on one disaster after another must eat you up inside. Maybe those kinds of people can separate themselves from fact to fiction easily. It takes training and good pay, I imagine; it also takes a lack of scruples.
I also wonder about Ivanka and Jared ALWAYS being with Trump when he meets and greets–-when he's on the phone––Is he really not capable of handling all this? Or do J&I not trust him? Is Daddy such a loose canon he has to be monitored?
Thanks, Haley. I am not so much worried about what I read, because I do read the venerable RealityChex, Charlie in Esquire, Crooks and Liars, Think Progress, The Rude Pundit, and two or three more on occasion. I am more disappointed in the mainstream media, who spent this whole election period kissing the "grits" of Trump the showman and even now can't seem to report on anything with equal weight, including NPR in that group. There aren't enough stories about his lies and grifting in the mainstream, and my favorite blogs are preaching to the choir... Anyhow, thanks so much to commenters here and elsewhere who keep hope alive with their pithy writing.
The headline at the NYTimes should be "trump afraid of reporters!" trump's coddlers need to remind him daily that every damn word out of his mouth is going to be on the record soon. And the world is already listening.
The new world.
No Presidential press conferences. All info on Twitter.
A 'conflict of interest' is a basic requirement for a government position.
The POTUS decides who should be a countries US ambassador.
America is no longer the world leader in part because almost no one is the world will work with the 'great America' (exceptions may apply to countries with a Trump tower).
In fact, the way for any country to get a US deal is to rename some tall building.
Andy Borowitz
Say what you will about Trump, he is extremely presidential. For example, it took Richard Nixon five years as President to become as paranoid and insane as Trump already is.
P.S. I just sent the ACLU $$$$$$
Thinking about the facts and fictions again. How many (those that voted for Trump) of these people are ignorant of how they are being scammed. Obama finally got through the overtime pay which will give some extra $$ to those in need. If the new administration pickpockets these people will they realize who is responsible? Who or what tells them that? Fox news? Perhaps we need to stream banners across the sky––"Obama gave you more–-Trump took it away."
Marie's comments about the lack in our education process. Yes, why do some of us recognize facts from made-up stuff––know nutjobs when we hear them. Someone here mentioned the tenancy for religious beliefs to be connected to other beliefs. If I believe in a god that answers prayers, I can believe in Alex Jones telling me whatever?
And speaking of scams: The fact––and it is a fact–-that Trump has settled his Trump U. lawsuits (remember he has said he NEVER settles suits) but tells us he has done so because the trial would interfere with his presidency–-this is pure bunk. I have yet to hear him tell us he is/ was wrong. Such a thin skin this man has.
It does not bode well to be thin skinned. All presidents have been made fun of in cartoons, by comedians, by writers, etc. It comes with the territory. And with this man you can bet there will be more of this than usual––it has already been excessive. Trump's two cents tweeting re: Hamilton is just the beginning. He might just crumble under the weight.
@PD Pepe: It's possible that Trump will "crumble under the weight" of criticism, but it seems more likely that he will crush the critics. He certainly will try to, & the question is whether the other arms of our vaunted "democratic system" will stop him or sit by complacently (or even abet him) while he tears down the institutions -- like the free press and public protest -- that have the potential to check his excesses.
This week alone he has verbally attacked both the media and the arts, not because they did anything wrong -- they didn't -- but because they questioned his actions, remarks & motives. Trump's verbal attacks in no way violate the Constitution, but there is reason to think -- because he's said so -- that when he assumes the presidency he will use the office to repress First Amendment rights. If what's going on in North Dakota is any indicator of this country's tolerance for official violence against minorities, there is no reason to think that citizens of good faith will be physically safe under a repressive federal regime. Even tho Trump has a financial interest in the Dakota pipeline, I don't think he is directly responsible for the police action there. But who knows? Perhaps fire-hosing, tear-gassing & shooting (with rubber bullets) protesters is local officials' way of currying favor with the new POTUS. Or maybe it's their way of expressing the white man's freeedom Trump's victory promises. Connection or not, I see the Dakota travesty as a harbinger of a society that Trump will try very hard to force into submission.
Marie
The answer to Lisa's question about whether Trump will expect his brand to be protected around the world, is yes. But don't forget that the vast majority of those properties are not Trump properties per se. He hasn't built much in years. Mostly he rents out his name to other developers who then allow him to strut around claiming their buildings as his own. There are at least 30 of these properties both in the US and abroad. He does own about 75% of the Post Office monstrosity however. But that won't matter if some Jihadi nutcase wants to make a point to great and powerful Trumpty Dumpty, and it does make for interesting legal questions for both the State Department and possibly the Pentagon.
A terrorist attack on two or three of these properties, even something minor, could set off a wave of cancellations and reservations could drop precipitously, not to mention the departure other businesses renting space. Trump would demand military protection.
Which brings us to the lashing of the media summoned to the throne room yesterday. Trump, who, anyone would have to admit, knows fuck all about democratic institutions, never mind the intricacies of the office of president, is not one for rules. It's already been demonstrated clearly that he has no interest in nor respect for traditions or proper (especially legal) conduct. He doesn't care about appearance of conflicts of interest or actual conflicts of interest. The only interest is Trump's. When he claims that the media should be honoring him for all the sacrifices he's making deigning to run the country, what he means is that he's ready to make the biggest haul of his life and he doesn't want any pesky reporters around asking inconvenient questions.
Trump sees himself as a king, not as a president. "L'etat c'est moi", if he knew what that meant, or understood the history behind the expression, is pretty much how he approaches things. More accurately it should be "L'etat est pour moi" or peut-être "Les Etats-Unis est pour moi". He summons the kingdom's chroniclers and lets them know that his royal trumpiness is not amused and they shall abide by the royal rules and he furthermore proclaims that, on pain of incurring his royal displeasure, they shall not presume to piss him off any further.
My favorite part, if true (although you can't trust anything Murdoch's rag prints), is the smacking down of his loyal puppy dog Jeff Zucker who carried water for Trump for a year and a half and whose CNN provided wall to wall free Trumperage for the duration of the campaign. "Thanks, Jeff, now fuck off!"
Conway and Priebus have their hands full trying to ensure that King Donnie comes off looking normal (hahahahahahahahaha--like trying to make Albert DeSalvo look like Tom Poston, the handyman on the old Bob Newhart show). Priebus, aware that red flags are flying all over the place is now whining that, of course there won't be any conflicts of interest. Not at all. Never in life. Why? Oh, well, Trump's White House counsel will take care of all of that. But...wait....he has no counsel yet. And the guy he's looking at has little to no experience navigating the tricky waters we're all now swimming in. But he does have other experience Trump values. This guy, Don McGahn, used to work for The Decider to destroy democracy. He was head of the FEC and worked tirelessly to allow as much dirty money as possible into the proceedings. His uncle used to be mob lawyer and fixer...er, casino lawyer for Trump. Trump sued him too. (Read this McGahn's background...a Trump kind of guy, alright.)
What should be going on right now, is that every editorial board of every major newspaper not already in the bag (NY Post, Washington Times, WSJ) should be gearing up for war. They should investigate every fucking semi-colon of every fucking piece of Trump connected documentation they can get their hands on and publish it. Every possible conflict of interest should be followed, every blind alley flooded with light and every rabbit hole scoured.
King Donnie should be hounded every inch of the way. He has already clearly demonstrated that he's in this for himself and thus has no benefit of the doubt. As someone once suggested to me, prior to an imminent street fight, whenever there's any doubt, there is no doubt. You have to treat it as such, or you'll be blindsided. Plus, Trump has been conning honest people all his life. He expects every break but will give none.
Pretty much every story about Trump from now on will begin with some version of "Never in presidential history..." and most of the nevers will be very bad. He thinks no rules apply to him. Most kings don't either, until, like Louis XVI, they get the close hair cut.
The goal now is to demonstrate to Donnie that he is no king, and hold his feet to the constitutional fire.
And those of his barbarous brood. The conniving little fuckers. I can just see Junior and Little Dracula rubbing their grimy hands together, seeing piles of loot in their future.
Is it really 53 years?
Like it was yesterday, BobbyLee. I was a freshman in college, went home for lunch, heard it on the car radio while returning, spent the next three days crying and watching my friend's tv, the catafalque drawn by horses seering my brain, to the sound of a drumbeat resounding in my head for years...
Eternal flame...
Like it was yesterday, BobbyLee. I was a freshman in college, went home for lunch, heard it on the car radio while returning, spent the next three days crying and watching my friend's tv, the catafalque drawn by horses seering my brain, to the sound of a drumbeat resounding in my head for years...
Eternal flame...
53 years...as my mother used to say, the hours are long but the years are short.
I was in the fourth grade. The nuns came in and told us that something terrible had happened and we were to get our things. School was ending a little early that day. Even as kids, we could feel the immense tension all around us. Normally we'd be thrilled to get out early on a Friday, but that day was different. When I got home, I could hear my mother upstairs crying. That was a long weekend. I was with my grandmother watching the coverage on Sunday when Oswald was shot. She was a nice old Irish lady and blessed herself as they announcers explained what had happened. I can still hear her..."Glory be to god, what's the world comin' to?"
And like Jeanne, I remember the drums. The riderless horse, the cortege....hard, crazy days.
This, more than anything else.
"If you wonder how Americans could vote for Trump, therein lies your answer. Partly because of a deficient public education system, adults aren't much more savvy than those clueless kids. I have no idea how I learned that the NYT, for all its lapses, is more reliably accurate than conspiracy nutjob Alex Jones, but it is a fundamental something you & I know that half of Americans don't."
Since we're "remembering like mad," as a far better writer than I am once wrote to me, it was my senior high school year. I was in a hospital bed in my parents' dining area, where I spent two months of three in a body cast, beginning a long recovery--I'm still recovering--from a grievous football injury.
I had troubles aplenty, and spent alternating hours reading, watching "General Hospital"--my first and last acquaintance with the daily soaps-- and feeling sorry for myself, but the shock of my father's phone call from his hardware store with the grim news, and the subsequent hours and days glued to the black and white TV made me forget my own. The nation's troubles were obviously much greater than mine.
It's a lesson I have been trying to recall since Black Tuesday. Yes, I am still in mourning for what might have been and worried sick about what might be, but the nation's fate is much more important than my own paltry feelings, and the fate of the many millions likely to be harmed by the new regime should rightly call on my entire store of sympathy.
I will try waste little on myself, and will do my best to have a Happy Thanksgiving, the last of the Obama era. We did have those eight years of sanity.
May all yours be Happy, if not deliriously so, as well.
Rather than feel some sense of relief over the Trump "reversals" expressed to the NYT, I'm more concerned. This is a deeply mentally ill man who is completely unpredictable. His narsicism controls every facet of his behavior. Like many narsicists, he is a coward and incapable of summoning up any better angels. I believe the pressures of the Presudency will finish him. Unfortunately, he is surrounding himself with people who have similarly narsicistic tendencies and personal agendas. They will ferociously protect him in order to maintain their own positions and agendas. I only hope that there are enough members of the public, people in the media and in government to expose him before he damages the country beyond repair.
He hasn't taken office yet and he's exhibiting dangerous erratic behavior and daring people to stop him by flaunting significant ethical standards and foundational democratic ideals.
Your last paragraph in one of your comments above, AK:
..." And those of his barbarous brood. The conniving little fuckers. I can just see Junior and Little Dracula rubbing their grimy hands together, seeing piles of loot in their future."
You forgot to speak about my favorite cause: Saving Endangered Species!" The two barbarous sons, Donny and Erik, will have open season hunting in game sanctuaries all over the world, all the time, during their father's reign. They will probably build a "museum of heads" next to Trump Tower to accommodate all the mounted heads of the beautiful animals they will slaughter. I fully expect them to begin hunting endangered sea creatures as well. These psychopaths have absolutely no boundaries--and they WANT IT ALL! Sigh....
Memory of cataclysmic events is subject to such odd tricks. I was a junior in Zo51 (genetics) at LSU and can remember the topic (binomial expansion), Professor Iyengar's sari, the layout of the room, and walking out to quiet except for transistor radios held up to ears. Then very little until the funeral.
Can't help comparing the behaviors of Kanye West and Trump.