;)
The Conversation -- October 3, 2023
Bye-Bye, My Kevin, Good-Bye
"The office of the Speaker of the House is hereby declared vacant."
Washington Post: "The Republican-led House voted Tuesday to oust Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) as speaker, the first such removal in congressional history. McCarthy's removal was sought by hard-right members of his own party. Democrats did not provide votes that would have been needed to save him. The move puts the House in uncharted territory as it searches for a leader.... The clerk called the roll alphabetically, with House members rising individually to cast their votes.&" ~~~
~~~ MSNBC reports that Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) will serve as Speaker Pro-Tem. McCarthy designated him to the House Parliamentarian in January. Update from the NYT liveblog, linked below: "Representative Patrick McHenry of North Carolina is named interim speaker under a law passed after the Sept. 11 attacks in the event of a vacancy in the office." ~~~
~~~ From the New York Times liveblog, also linked below. Catie Edmondson: "The House on Tuesday voted to oust Kevin McCarthy from the speakership, a move without precedent in modern history that left the chamber without a leader and plunged it into chaos. Democrats joined with a small group of hard-liners in Mr. McCarthy's own party to strip the California Republican of the speaker's gavel in a 216 to 210 vote. It was the culmination of a bitter power struggle between Mr. McCarthy and members of a far-right faction who tried to block his ascent to the speakership in January and have tormented him ever since, trying to stymie his efforts to keep the government funded and the nation from defaulting on its debt." Update. Then this: "Shortly after the vote, Mr. McCarthy announced in a closed-door meeting with Republicans that he would not run for speaker again, and Republicans left the Capitol and prepared to return to their districts for the next week with no clear path forward."
~~~ From the CNN liveblog, also linked below: "The US House of Representatives has voted to oust Rep. Kevin McCarthy in a historic vote on Tuesday. The vote on the motion to vacate was 216-210 with eight Republicans voting to remove McCarthy from the speakership. The Republicans who voted to oust McCarthy were: Andy Biggs, Ken Buck, Tim Burchett, Eli Crane, Matt Gaetz, Bob Good, Nancy Mace and Matt Rosendale. The House will now need to elect a new speaker, but there is no clear alternative who would have the support needed to win the gavel. No House speaker has ever before been ousted through the passage of a resolution to remove them."
House of Chaos, Ctd. Catie Edmonson of the New York Times: "Speaker Kevin McCarthy said on Tuesday that he would not try to broker a deal with Democrats to defeat a hard-right effort to oust him, even though he has little chance of hanging onto his leadership post without their support. In an interview on CNBC's 'Squawk Box,' Mr. McCarthy said Democrats would 'decide whatever they're going to do. And we will live with whatever happens.' Democrats 'haven't asked for anything' in exchange for voting to support him, Mr. McCarthy said, 'and I'm not going to provide anything.'... House Democrats were set to meet on Tuesday morning to consider whether to bail out Mr. McCarthy. Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, the Democratic leader, told CNBC in an interview on Tuesday that the party would 'come to a collective decision at the end.'" ~~~
~~~ The story has been folded into a liveblog: "Speaker Kevin McCarthy [said] he planned to call a vote on Tuesday on the right-wing move to oust him from his post, after declaring that he had no intention of giving Democrats any concessions in exchange for helping him survive." ~~~
Luke Broadwater: "Speaker after speaker in the Democrats' closed-door meeting rose to speak against helping McCarthy, saying he can't be trusted and Democrats must remain united against helping him, said Representative Mark Takano of California. 'We don't have an obligation to save this speaker.'"
Kayla Guo: "McCarthy conceded to reporters that if five Republicans voted to oust him, and Democrats stay united against him, that he would lose the speakership. Does that seem likely to happen? 'Probably so,' he said. But he added that he remains confident he'll survive. 'I just don't give up.'"
Edmondson: "In a letter to House Democrats minutes ahead of an expected vote, the Democratic leader, Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, wrote: 'Given their unwillingness to break from MAGA extremism in an authentic and comprehensive manner, House Democratic leadership will vote yes on the pending Republican Motion to Vacate the Chair.'"
** Edmondson: "Speaker Kevin McCarthy has lost the vote to kill Representative Matt Gaetz's bid to oust him, 208 to 218. That tees an up-or-down vote to remove McCarthy."
CNN is liveblogging Donald Trump's civil trial in Manhattan. So far, Trump has sat through the second day of trial.
Update: "Judge Arthur Engoron, who is overseeing the New York attorney general's civil case against Donald Trump, said Tuesday that the trial itself is not the venue for Trump's attorneys to contest what he's already ruled on. 'That's why we have appeals,' Engoron said. The judge made several comments about the trial and the testimony at the start of the second day of a trial that's expected to go into December."
Update. "Judge Arthur Engoron rebuked Donald Trump after the former president attacked his clerk in a social media post on Tuesday and forbade the parties from making any future comments about his staff. 'This morning one of the defendants posted on social media account a disparaging untrue and personally identifying post about a member of my staff. Although I have since ordered the post deleted and apparently it was, it was also emailed out to millions of other recipients,' the judge said in court. 'Personal attacks of any member of my court staff are unacceptable, inappropriate and I will not tolerate them,' the judge said. The judge then said all parties must not speak publicly about any members of the court staff." ~~~
~~~ New York Judge Tells Trump to STFU. Steve Reilly & Adam Klasfeld of the Messenger: "The New York judge presiding over Donald Trump's civil fraud trial on Tuesday issued a gag order after the former president attacked his clerk by name and shared her image on social media. 'Personal attacks on members on my court staff are unacceptable, inappropriate, and I won't tolerate it [in my courtroom],' said New York State Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron. He added later to 'consider this a gag order for all parties from posting about any members of my staff.' The judge rebuked the 'untrue and personally identifying posts' about a staff member. 'Schumer's girlfriend, Alison R. Greenfield, is running this case against me. How disgraceful! This case should be dismissed immediately!!' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, along with a picture of the clerk and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. The post appeared to show a photograph of Greenfield standing next to Schumer, without any more context. Fact-checkers note that false rumors about Schumer and infidelity appear to trace their origins to a now-shuttered satirical website." ~~~
~~~ Marie: If Trump had been a real president, you would not believe he had targeted a court clerk with a damaging story that included personal information and his "source" for the story was a shut-down satirical website. But it's Trump, and you just shake your head. Even as a thug -- his greatest talent -- he's an amateurish screw-up.
Lindsay Whitehurst & Claudia Lauer of the AP: "Hunter Biden pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to three federal firearms charges filed after a plea deal imploded, putting the case on track toward a possible trial as the 2024 election looms. His lawyer Abbe Lowell said in court he plans to file a motion to dismiss the case, challenging their constitutionality."
Marie: Earlier today, I linked to a story by Jake Traylor of NBC News, who noticed that "... Donald Trump is lashing out at political and legal foes in increasingly violent terms as his campaign to return to office accelerates." Traylor isn't the only one who noticed: ~~~
~~~ Maggie Haberman, et al., of the New York Times: "... Donald J. Trump had a lot to say on the first day of the fraud trial against him and his company. Speaking to reporters at a Manhattan courthouse on Monday, he dismissed the judge as a 'rogue' justice and said he did not 'think the people of this country are going to stand for it.' And..., 'This is a disgrace,' he said, 'and you ought to go after this attorney general.' The remark urging people to 'go after' a top elected official in New York, by a former president whose invective has become a familiar backdrop of American life, was part of a pattern of increasingly sharp language from Mr. Trump.... His calls for supporters to refuse to 'stand' for what he insists is a broad miscarriage of justice -- are front and center in nearly every statement he makes." MB: You need merely put together his remark about people's not standing for the New York trial with his urging to go after Letitia James to see a nearly direct plea to harm James. There oughta be a law.
~~~~~~~~~~
Catie Edmonson of the New York Times: "Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida moved on Monday to oust Speaker Kevin McCarthy from his post in an act of vengeance that posed the clearest threat yet to Mr. McCarthy's tenure and could plunge the House into chaos. After days of warnings, Mr. Gaetz rose Monday evening to bring up a resolution declaring the speakership vacant, which starts a process that would force a vote within days on whether to keep Mr. McCarthy in his post. In doing so, Mr. Gaetz sought to subject Mr. McCarthy to a rare form of political punishment experienced by only two other speakers in the history of the House of Representatives." (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~
~~~ Olivia Beavers & Jordain Carney of Politico: "It's far from clear that Gaetz has the votes to depose McCarthy, as the Floridian himself acknowledged to reporters after making his move. Only three colleagues, Reps. Eli Crane (R-Ariz.), Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) and Bob Good (R-Va.), are openly supportive of his effort. But a handful of other House Republicans frustrated with the speaker are seen as persuadable on the matter of his future." (Also linked yesterday.) The AP's story is here. ~~~
~~~ What About Kevin? Carl Hulse & Luke Broadwater of the New York Times: "The hard-right move to oust Speaker Kevin McCarthy from his post has presented House Democrats with a tricky question: Should they help rescue the California Republican who has worked against their agenda and recently opened an impeachment inquiry against President Biden? Mr. McCarthy's slender majority and the size of the band of right-wing rebels working to depose him mean that he has little chance of surviving a vote to keep his job -- which requires a majority -- without at least some support from Democrats. But it is nearly unheard-of for members of the minority to vote for the opposing party's candidate for speaker.... Multiple Democrats said that they expected to take a unified position on the fate of the speaker, and that they would meet Tuesday morning to begin the process of determining what they would do.... Democratic officials said that, absent some sort of tangible and enforceable concession from Mr. McCarthy that benefited them, they could not envision a sufficient number backing him to offset Republican defections."
Jamelle Bouie of the New York Times: "... the only way to square the circle of a radical minority with democracy-destroying potential is to acknowledge the way our institutions work to empower the people who hope to overturn constitutional government altogether.... For as much as we have changed and transformed our political institutions -- to make them far more inclusive and responsive than they were at their inception -- it is also clear that they retain the stamp of their heritage. Our counter-majoritarian institutions, for example, continue to place an incredibly higher barrier to efforts to reduce concentrations of wealth and promote greater economic equality.... The Trump crisis may never have materialized if not for specific institutions, like the Electoral College, that gave [Donald] Trump the White House despite his defeat at the hands of most voters. And even with the Electoral College, Trump might not have won if our Supreme Court had not, in Shelby County v. Holder, invalidated the most aggressive and effective rule for the federal protection of voting rights since Reconstruction.... If anyone is aware of this, it has to be [President] Biden, who won the national popular vote by 6 million in 2020, but would have lost the election if not for a few tens of thousands of votes across a handful of so-called swing states."
Benjamin Weiser of the New York Times: "A Manhattan federal judge on Monday said Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey, who faces charges of wide-ranging corruption, will stand trial on May 6 next year, along with his wife and three businessmen who were indicted with him. The date would place the trial just one month before the June 4 New Jersey state primary and raises the specter, if Mr. Menendez runs for re-election, of voters going to the polls while he is on trial, without knowing what verdict, if any, the jury might return. In court on Monday, a prosecutor said the government expected the trial to last four to six weeks, assuming all five defendants were still part of the case. Mr. Menendez, a Democrat..., had been preparing to run for re-election but has not indicated whether, in the face of bribery charges, he still intended to seek a fourth full term."
Jake Traylor of NBC News: "... Donald Trump is lashing out at political and legal foes in increasingly violent terms as his campaign to return to office accelerates.... The aggressive turn began a week ago on Truth Social, where Trump alluded to the execution of his former top military official [Gen. Mark Milley].... It's clear that some Trump supporters are hanging on his every word as his language takes a combustible turn. Many supporters on the campaign trail with Trump this week admire what he has to say and reflect the same sentiments."
Ben Protess, et al., of the New York Times: In a civil trial that began Monday, the New York State "attorney general's office accused [Donald Trump] of inflating his riches by more than $2 billion [link fixed] to obtain favorable deals with banks and bragging rights about his wealth. Outside the courtroom, fired a fusillade of personal attacks on [New York Attorney General Letitia] James and the judge, Arthur F. Engoron. He called the judge 'rogue' and Ms. James 'a terrible person,' even suggesting that they were criminals.... 'You ought to go after this attorney general,' he said, without specifying who or how. He said that Justice Engoron should 'be disbarred' and that the case against him was 'a witch hunt, it's a disgrace.'... Inside, Mr. Trump sat in uncomfortable silence as Ms. James's lawyers methodically laid out their case. 'Year after year, loan after loan, defendants misrepresented Mr. Trump's net worth,' Kevin Wallace, a lawyer for Ms. James, said during opening statements. Exaggerating for a television audience or Forbes Magazine's list of the richest people is one thing, he said, but 'you cannot do it while conducting business in the state of New York.'... As he left the courtroom on Monday afternoon, Mr. Trump passed Ms. James in the front row. He glared at her. Soon after, his son Eric[, who also is a defendant,] walked by and shook her hand." ~~~
~~~ Marie: If you are old enough and if you live in an urban (or upscale) enough area, you probably have met extremely rich people. I'd be stunned if any of them ever boasted to you about his wealth. You may have met super-rich people and not even known it because they don't let on how wealthy they are. There is something fundamentally wrong with anyone who does say things like, "My financials are phenomenal," as Trump did Monday.
Marie: I wonder if anyone ever sat Donald Trump down and calmly showed him that he's absolutely crazy. The calm person could show Donald stuff like this to make her point: ~~~
~~~ Miranda Nazzaro of the Hill: "Former President Trump said Sunday that Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) should be jailed for the 'egregious act' of pulling the fire alarm Saturday ahead of the House's vote on a stopgap measure to keep the government open past the midnight deadline. 'Will Congressman Jamal Bowman be prosecuted and imprisoned for very dangerously pulling and setting off the main fire alarm system in order to stop a Congressional vote that was going on in D.C.,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post Sunday. 'His egregious act is covered on tape, a horrible display of nerve and criminality.'" MB: Yeah but attempting to lead and carry out an insurrection in which dozens of police personnel are injured is fine, and jailing the perps is a violation of their First Amendment rights. (Also linked yesterday.) ~~~
~~~ And, worse, stuff like this: ~~~
~~~ ** Jake Tapper, et al., of CNN: "John Kelly, the longest-serving White House chief of staff for Donald Trump, offered his harshest criticism yet of the former president in an exclusive statement to CNN. Kelly set the record straight with on-the-record confirmation of a number of damning stories about statements Trump made behind closed doors attacking US service members and veterans, listing a number of objectionable comments Kelly witnessed Trump make firsthand.... [Kelly described] 'A person that thinks those who defend their country in uniform, or are shot down or seriously wounded in combat, or spend years being tortured as POWs are all "suckers" because "there is nothing in it for them." A person that did not want to be seen in the presence of military amputees because "it doesn't look good for me." A person who demonstrated open contempt for a Gold Star family -- for all Gold Star families -- on TV during the 2016 campaign, and rants that our most precious heroes who gave their lives in America's defense are "losers" and wouldn't visit their graves in France.... A person who admires autocrats and murderous dictators. A person that has nothing but contempt for our democratic institutions, our Constitution, and the rule of law.'" And more. ~~~
~~~ Aaron Blake of the Washington Post: "... some of the most serious reports about what he's said have gone largely unconfirmed by key players. That changed in a major way on Monday. Former Trump White House chief of staff John F. Kelly delivered a blistering statement to CNN's Jake Tapper that, for the first time, served to confirm years-old comments attributed to [Donald] Trump and for which Kelly was present.... You can now add [Kelly] to the list of former top aides warning in some very strong terms about another Trump term -- and effectively labeling Trump a clear and present danger." ~~~
~~~ AND what about this? ~~~
~~~ Michael Sainato of the Guardian: "Faced with a litany of criminal charges, Donald Trump on Sunday told a campaign rally in Iowa that he would prefer to die by electrocution rather than be eaten by a shark if he ever found himself on a rapidly sinking, electrically powered boat. The former president and frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination delivered the bizarre remarks during a speech in the community of Ottumwa. He was pontificating over batteries for electric powered boats.... Trump ... continued criticizing the prospect of any other sustainable energy technologies and claiming he would repeal the Joe Biden White House's electric vehicle mandate. 'These people are crazy,' Trump said." MB: More projection.
Colleen Long of the AP: "Attorney General Merrick Garland said in an interview that aired Sunday that he would resign if asked by President Joe Biden to take action against Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump. But he doesn't think he'll be put in that position. 'I am sure that that will not happen, but I would not do anything in that regard,' he said on CBS '60 Minutes.' 'And if necessary, I would resign. But there is no sense that anything like that will happen.'... Garland said the president has never tried to meddle in the investigations, and he dismissed criticism from Republicans that he was going easy on the president's son, Hunter, who was recently indicted on a gun charge after a plea deal in his tax case fell apart." (Also linked yesterday.)
Tom Jackman & Dan Lamothe of the Washington Post: "A senior member of the Department of Defense communications staff has been arrested and charged with participating in a dogfighting ring in the D.C. area for more than 20 years, federal authorities disclosed Monday. The ring regularly trained dogs for fights, ran thousands of dollars in bets on the outcomes, and executed dogs that didn't die during matches, court records state. Frederick Douglass Moorefield Jr., 62, of Arnold, Md., was a deputy chief information officer for command, control and communications for the Secretary of Defense's Chief Information Officer, court records and Moorefield's LinkedIn page show. He was arrested Thursday on a charge of promoting and furthering animal fighting venture, along with a longtime friend who allegedly admitted his participation in dogfighting, Mario D. Flythe, 49, of Glen Burnie. Investigators found battery jumper cables, which allegedly were used to execute dogs at Moorefield's house, along with five pit bull-type dogs at his house and five pit bull-type dogs at Flythe's house, court records show." A CBS News story is here.
Zach Schonfeld of the Hill: "The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a long-shot bid to disqualify former President Trump from running for office under the 14th Amendment. John Castro, who is running for the Republican presidential nomination, has filed various lawsuits seeking to challenge Trump's eligibility under the amendment's provision targeting those involved in insurrections. In a brief, unsigned order issued Monday, the justices declined to take up one of his cases after Castro lost in a lower court." (Also linked yesterday.)
Justice Thomas Regrets He Cannot Opine Today. Rebecca Beitsch of the Hill: "The Supreme Court on Monday denied an effort by lawyer John Eastman to appeal a ruling that found he may have acted criminally with the legal advice he gave former President Trump. It spurred a rare recusal from Justice Clarence Thomas, whose wife corresponded with the California attorney in the weeks ahead of Jan. 6. Thomas's recusal comes after reporting that his wife, Ginni Thomas, emailed Eastman, as well as Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows and Arizona lawmakers wrestling with pressure from the Trump campaign, to look for ways to reverse the election. The episode ... triggered a renewed look at Thomas's failure to recuse himself from other matters relating to Jan. 6. His actions have further come under the microscope following reporting he accepted a series of lavish gifts from a Republican megadonor. The order says that Thomas 'took no part in the consideration' of Eastman's petition." (Also linked yesterday.) The New York Times story is here.
Marie: So you thought Elon Musk's rapid but evolving destruction of Twitter was a testament to his incompetence? Maybe not. Maybe it all has been adherence to a diabolical plan. Really. ~~~
~~~ Ben Collins of NBC News: "On the day that public records revealed that Elon Musk had become Twitter's biggest shareholder, an unknown sender texted the billionaire and recommended an article imploring him to acquire the social network outright. Musk's purchase of Twitter, the 3,000-word anonymous article said, would amount to a 'declaration of war against the Globalist American Empire.' The sender of the texts was offering Musk, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO, a playbook for the takeover and transformation of Twitter. As the anniversary of Musk's purchase approaches, the identity of the sender remains unknown. The three texts were sent on April 4, 2022. In the nearly 18 months since then, many of the decisions Musk made after he bought Twitter appear to have closely followed that road map, up to and including his ongoing attacks against the Anti-Defamation League, a nonprofit organization founded by Jewish Americans to counter discrimination.... The [article was published on a] site is run by the far-right blogger Darren Beattie, a former Trump White House speechwriter who was fired in 2018 for having spoken on a panel alongside white nationalists. After the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, Beattie promoted the baseless claim that the FBI had planted agents in the crowd who incited it to storm the building." Read on. ~~~
~~~ Marie: I know this sounds batshit crazy, but Collins is a reliable reporter on the batshit crazy, and he shows how Musk has fairly closely followed the plan laid out in the anonymous essay.
~~~~~~~~~~
Arizona. Isaac Stanley Becker & Yvonne Sanchez of the Washington Post: "Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs said Monday that her administration would effectively kick a Saudi-owned alfalfa farm off a critical stretch of state land, a forceful step that speaks to the firestorm of controversy over foreign extraction of natural resources as well as deepening dilemmas over water scarcity as climate change dries out the West. The move will prevent the Saudi-owned company, Fondomonte Arizona, from pumping groundwater that could one day serve as backup for booming urban areas. Currently, the company uses the water to grow alfalfa to feed the kingdom's dairy cows. Fondomonte came under fierce bipartisan criticism on the campaign trail last year, and Hobbs, a Democrat who took office in January, has been under pressure to act."
Kansas. Eduardo Medina of the New York Times: "The police chief of Marion, Kansas, who had ordered raids on the office of a local newspaper and the home of its publisher in August resigned on Monday, an official said, after facing mounting questions over his officers' aggressive actions against the news organization. The mayor of Marion, David Mayfield, told the city council on Monday night that the former chief, Gideon Cody, resigned 'effective immediately,' according to Zach Collett, a council member." ~~~
~~~ A Grudge in Search of a Crime. Sarah Burris of the Raw Story: "The Messenger has obtained emails exposing the Marion County Police Chief trying to invent a justification for raiding the local newspaper. The news site filed an open-records request seeking the emails of suspended cop Gideon Cody as he searched for a law that would enable him to get the FBI to back him up on a wide-ranging subpoena." Thanks to RAS for the link.
Washington, D.C. Andrés Martinez of the New York Times: "Rep. Henry Cuellar, a Democrat from Texas, was held up at gunpoint and his vehicle was stolen in Washington on Monday evening, according to his office. He was not harmed and police later recovered the vehicle. Mr. Cuellar was parking on Monday at 9:30 p.m. in the Navy Yard neighborhood, about a mile from Capitol Hill, when three armed people approached him and stole his vehicle, said Jacob Hochberg, the congressman's chief of staff. The Metropolitan Police Department and Capitol Police are investigating the crime, he said. Mr. Cuellar's iPad and iPhone were also stolen, Mr. Hochberg said. He did not say whether the devices had been recovered." The Hill's story is here.
~~~~~~~~~~
Another Crack in the Anti-Gay, Anti-Woman Roman Catholic Church. Anthony Faiola, et al., of the Washington Post: "In the shadow of Cologne's Gothic cathedral..., men with men, women with women, and women with men -- lined up to have their unions blessed by ordained Catholic priests wearing rainbow stoles. It was an act of love -- but also sedition, in direct defiance of the Vatican's decree that same-sex unions should not be celebrated or recognized. The German Catholic Church, long known for pushing the boundaries of the faith, has been translating frustrations among progressive Catholics in pockets throughout Europe into a veritable revolt.... Pope Francis has reprimanded Germany's Catholic leadership... On Monday, however, the Vatican released a document that seemed to open a door to blessing same-sex unions and the study of female priests. In the letter, dated Sept. 25, Francis wrote that there are 'situations' that may not be 'morally acceptable' but where a priest can assess, on a case-by-case basis, whether blessings may be given -- as long as such blessings are kept separate from the sacrament of marriage."
News Lede
New York Times: "The Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Pierre Agostini, Ferenc Krausz and Anne L'Huillier on Tuesday for their experiments that 'have given humanity new tools for exploring the world of electrons inside atoms and molecules. 'Electrons' movements in atoms and molecules are so quick that they are measured in 'attoseconds,' and the experiments conducted by the three scientists demonstrated that attosecond pulses could be observed and measured, the awarding committee said."
Share Article 
Reader Comments (14)
Work has started on the house in Austria where Adolf Hitler was
born in 1889. It's being turned into a police station and to make it
unattractive as a site of pilgrimage for people who glorify the
Nazi dictator.
All those collectors of Hitler memorabilia had better get there soon
if they want to give a last Nazi salute to Hitler's old home.
https://apnews.com/article/austria-hitler-birthplace-police-station-
nazi-291affb7131c80e3374cb0b5a42b299
More irony from those fellow at the AEI...
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/03/opinion/science-americans-trust-covid.html
Kinda rich coming from the AEI, this report of decline in trust in institutions. It's a case of being bit by the dog you trained to bite.
Spend millions over decades telling an uneducated public that it shouldn't trust a government that is charged with overseeing business interests that in the pursuit of profit often harm the public and the planet and then pretend puzzlement when skepticism of expertise loses its focus on government and is applied to business as well.
No mystery at all, really.
But then, the American public has long been easy to gull. After all, more than half believe in angels.
It would be funny if reality actually cared what people believe.
This is obviously not how it works, but yesterday
"Trump said, “We have a clause in the contract, it’s like a buyer beware clause. It says, ‘When you take a look at the financial statement, don’t believe anything you read’ — this is up front. ‘Don’t believe anything you read.’ Some people call it a ‘worthless clause,’ because it makes the statement, and anything you read in the statement, worthless. It says, ‘Go out and do your own research, go out and do your own due diligence, you have to study the statement carefully. Do not believe anything.’”"
Two things:
-- Democrats almost have to vote to support Mykevin's continuation as Speaker. There is no reason to believe that R's would be able to replace him in any reasonable period, and if he is unseated and until a Speaker is seated, no other business can be done in the House. Without D votes the crazies can make sure nothing gets done, including no supplemental for Ukraine and then no further FY24 funding, i.e. let the CR run out for 45 days then do nothing. R's can perpetuate a government shutdown indefinitely that way. Even if D's vote for MyK, the nutsos can make motions to unseat every day until the cows come home, but even the true MAGAts could find that just too too. (No, really, they might perceive dimly this stuff just doesn't work.)
-- Thing 2, Clarence's recusal. Pundits say he has seen the problem of Ginny and the Januaries. But, he probably hasn't. The case at hand was brought by one of his former clerks, Eastman, so that is the only conflict he would use to justify rccusal. And Justices don't need to provide reasons, which suits his style.
@Patrick: I think you're right about Clarence, although I suppose it's possible Roberts went and sat on him till he said uncle.
As for the House, the outcome is still TBD in my view inasmuch as there are numerous possibilities as to how it could play out. It may depend, for instance, upon the whims of one Donald Trump, who is just now preoccupied with having Tish James assassinated by a deranged Trumpist. If Democrats do tacitly support My Kevin, I'd guess it would come in the form of their just not showing up for the vote, thus giving My Kevin a majority of the votes cast. But if something different happens -- like some other candidate becomes speaker, I won't be gobsmacked.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/interactive/2023/american-life-expectancy-dropping/?
Tempted to make more of this (in a political direction) but for now will leave it as a description of America's geographically-defined slow suicide.
I have a thought about the two men who were arrested for running a
dog fight ring, and then killing the losing dogs.
They should be put in a large dog cage and have those jumper
cables attached to their testicles so they can know what the dogs
went through.
Do I sound too much like trump? Sorry.
@Forrest M.: No. Anybody who would participate in any way with dog fighting, much less to act in ways these men are alleged to have done, deserves the worst.
Taking out the trash
"Satellite television company Dish Network has been hit with a $150,000 fine for failing to properly dispose of one of its satellites, marking the first time federal regulators have issued such a penalty."
Help line
"A Ukrainian Officer’s Captured Russian Tank Wasn’t Working. So He Called Tech Support—In Russia."
Trump issued Gag order
"Unhinged, deranged fraud defendant Donald Trump posted at attack on the Clerk for Judge Engoron on Truth Social during his trial today.
Trump listed her name, claimed that she is Senator Chuck Schumer's girlfriend (she's not – Schumer has been married for over four decades), posted her phone, a link to her Instagram account, and demanded that his case be dismissed because of her."
Okay, the GOP got rid of Kevin. How long does the cluster bump to choose a new schmuck last?
Those people have such a hard time getting it together I have to wonder how they manage to reproduce.
Did Qevin qry?
Michael Cohen, a necessary piece of work.